Analytical Models for Shear-bearing Capacity of Hollow Core Beams Strengthened with HPC and Shear Steel Rebars

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Wenping Du, Guanjun Zhang, Caiqian Yang, Kai Ming, Peng Hou, Zheheng Chen, Zhihong Pan, Yaqiang Yang, Hans De Backer, Yong Pan
{"title":"Analytical Models for Shear-bearing Capacity of Hollow Core Beams Strengthened with HPC and Shear Steel Rebars","authors":"Wenping Du, Guanjun Zhang, Caiqian Yang, Kai Ming, Peng Hou, Zheheng Chen, Zhihong Pan, Yaqiang Yang, Hans De Backer, Yong Pan","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-2442-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Facing the insufficient shear-bearing capacity of Hollow Core Beam (HCB), the High-performance Concrete (HPC) and shear steel rebars were proposed by the authors. However, investigations of the maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens were scarce. Simultaneously, there were no details for the shear failure mechanism of the complex interface between HCB and HPC. For this reason, the failure modes and stirrup stress were first investigated. A simple model of maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens was suggested. The maximum deviation of predictive value and test result was within 3%. Secondly, a modified truss-arch model of strengthened HCB specimen was proposed, considering the tensile behavior of the HPC. The average ratio of estimated and experimental results was 1.02. Finally, the shear-bearing capacity of strengthened HCB specimens was suggested considering the shear contribution of the HPC, shear steel rebars and interface bonding force. Compared with the previous shear test results reported by the authors, the maximum deviation was within 1%. To validate the accuracy of the formula, the other HCB specimen was used to evaluate the maximum deviation within 5%. It can be concluded that the proposed formula agrees well with the test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17897,"journal":{"name":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2442-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facing the insufficient shear-bearing capacity of Hollow Core Beam (HCB), the High-performance Concrete (HPC) and shear steel rebars were proposed by the authors. However, investigations of the maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens were scarce. Simultaneously, there were no details for the shear failure mechanism of the complex interface between HCB and HPC. For this reason, the failure modes and stirrup stress were first investigated. A simple model of maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens was suggested. The maximum deviation of predictive value and test result was within 3%. Secondly, a modified truss-arch model of strengthened HCB specimen was proposed, considering the tensile behavior of the HPC. The average ratio of estimated and experimental results was 1.02. Finally, the shear-bearing capacity of strengthened HCB specimens was suggested considering the shear contribution of the HPC, shear steel rebars and interface bonding force. Compared with the previous shear test results reported by the authors, the maximum deviation was within 1%. To validate the accuracy of the formula, the other HCB specimen was used to evaluate the maximum deviation within 5%. It can be concluded that the proposed formula agrees well with the test results.

使用 HPC 和抗剪钢筋加固的空心梁抗剪承载力分析模型
面对空心芯梁(HCB)抗剪承载力不足的问题,作者提出了高性能混凝土(HPC)和抗剪钢筋。然而,关于加强型 HCB 试件的最大对角裂缝宽度的研究却很少。同时,对于 HCB 和 HPC 之间复杂界面的剪切破坏机制也没有详细研究。因此,首先对破坏模式和箍筋应力进行了研究。研究人员提出了强化 HCB 试样最大对角线裂缝宽度的简单模型。预测值与试验结果的最大偏差在 3% 以内。其次,考虑到 HPC 的拉伸行为,提出了一种改进的 HCB 增强试样桁架拱模型。估计结果与试验结果的平均比值为 1.02。最后,考虑到 HPC、剪切钢筋和界面粘结力的剪切贡献,提出了加固 HCB 试件的剪切承载力。与作者之前报告的剪切试验结果相比,最大偏差在 1%以内。为了验证该公式的准确性,还使用了另一个 HCB 试样来评估其最大偏差是否在 5%以内。由此可以得出结论,所提出的公式与测试结果吻合得很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering is a technical bimonthly journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. The journal reports original study results (both academic and practical) on past practices and present information in all civil engineering fields. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering, which includes, but are not limited to, the following: coastal and harbor engineering, construction management, environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, highway engineering, hydraulic engineering, information technology, nuclear power engineering, railroad engineering, structural engineering, surveying and geo-spatial engineering, transportation engineering, tunnel engineering, and water resources and hydrologic engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信