Analytical Models for Shear-bearing Capacity of Hollow Core Beams Strengthened with HPC and Shear Steel Rebars

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wenping Du, Guanjun Zhang, Caiqian Yang, Kai Ming, Peng Hou, Zheheng Chen, Zhihong Pan, Yaqiang Yang, Hans De Backer, Yong Pan
{"title":"Analytical Models for Shear-bearing Capacity of Hollow Core Beams Strengthened with HPC and Shear Steel Rebars","authors":"Wenping Du, Guanjun Zhang, Caiqian Yang, Kai Ming, Peng Hou, Zheheng Chen, Zhihong Pan, Yaqiang Yang, Hans De Backer, Yong Pan","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-2442-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Facing the insufficient shear-bearing capacity of Hollow Core Beam (HCB), the High-performance Concrete (HPC) and shear steel rebars were proposed by the authors. However, investigations of the maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens were scarce. Simultaneously, there were no details for the shear failure mechanism of the complex interface between HCB and HPC. For this reason, the failure modes and stirrup stress were first investigated. A simple model of maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens was suggested. The maximum deviation of predictive value and test result was within 3%. Secondly, a modified truss-arch model of strengthened HCB specimen was proposed, considering the tensile behavior of the HPC. The average ratio of estimated and experimental results was 1.02. Finally, the shear-bearing capacity of strengthened HCB specimens was suggested considering the shear contribution of the HPC, shear steel rebars and interface bonding force. Compared with the previous shear test results reported by the authors, the maximum deviation was within 1%. To validate the accuracy of the formula, the other HCB specimen was used to evaluate the maximum deviation within 5%. It can be concluded that the proposed formula agrees well with the test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2442-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facing the insufficient shear-bearing capacity of Hollow Core Beam (HCB), the High-performance Concrete (HPC) and shear steel rebars were proposed by the authors. However, investigations of the maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens were scarce. Simultaneously, there were no details for the shear failure mechanism of the complex interface between HCB and HPC. For this reason, the failure modes and stirrup stress were first investigated. A simple model of maximum diagonal crack width of the strengthened HCB specimens was suggested. The maximum deviation of predictive value and test result was within 3%. Secondly, a modified truss-arch model of strengthened HCB specimen was proposed, considering the tensile behavior of the HPC. The average ratio of estimated and experimental results was 1.02. Finally, the shear-bearing capacity of strengthened HCB specimens was suggested considering the shear contribution of the HPC, shear steel rebars and interface bonding force. Compared with the previous shear test results reported by the authors, the maximum deviation was within 1%. To validate the accuracy of the formula, the other HCB specimen was used to evaluate the maximum deviation within 5%. It can be concluded that the proposed formula agrees well with the test results.

使用 HPC 和抗剪钢筋加固的空心梁抗剪承载力分析模型
面对空心芯梁(HCB)抗剪承载力不足的问题,作者提出了高性能混凝土(HPC)和抗剪钢筋。然而,关于加强型 HCB 试件的最大对角裂缝宽度的研究却很少。同时,对于 HCB 和 HPC 之间复杂界面的剪切破坏机制也没有详细研究。因此,首先对破坏模式和箍筋应力进行了研究。研究人员提出了强化 HCB 试样最大对角线裂缝宽度的简单模型。预测值与试验结果的最大偏差在 3% 以内。其次,考虑到 HPC 的拉伸行为,提出了一种改进的 HCB 增强试样桁架拱模型。估计结果与试验结果的平均比值为 1.02。最后,考虑到 HPC、剪切钢筋和界面粘结力的剪切贡献,提出了加固 HCB 试件的剪切承载力。与作者之前报告的剪切试验结果相比,最大偏差在 1%以内。为了验证该公式的准确性,还使用了另一个 HCB 试样来评估其最大偏差是否在 5%以内。由此可以得出结论,所提出的公式与测试结果吻合得很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信