Cut-off points to classify numeric values of quality of life into normal, mild, moderate, and severe categories: an update for EORTC-QLQ-H&N35

Jyoti Saini, Jaimanti Bakshi, Naresh K. Panda, Maryada Sharma, Dharam Vir, Atul Kumar Goyal
{"title":"Cut-off points to classify numeric values of quality of life into normal, mild, moderate, and severe categories: an update for EORTC-QLQ-H&N35","authors":"Jyoti Saini, Jaimanti Bakshi, Naresh K. Panda, Maryada Sharma, Dharam Vir, Atul Kumar Goyal","doi":"10.1186/s43163-024-00642-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality of life (QoL) is an important determinant of physical and mental health. QoL in head and neck cancer tends to deteriorate due to changes in the physical, functional, psychological aspects. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 is an instrument that measure the QoL specifically in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 give a numeric value to QoL of patients with high value correspond to better QoL. The aim of present study was to find out the cut-off points of numeric values of EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 to categorize QoL impairment into different categories (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Present study also aims analyze the QoL among head and neck cancer patients under these new categories. Total 205 patients of head and neck cancer visiting to the outpatient unit were enrolled in this study. Hindi version of EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 was used to evaluate the QoL. Total 9 classification schemes were created with different cut-off points to classify the global QoL score into normal, mild, moderate and severe categories. QoL data was then analyze using the scheme having highest F value in ANOVA test. Classification scheme having cut-off values 76–100 for normal QoL, 51–75 for mild QoL impairment, 26–50 for moderate and 0–25 for severe QoL impairment found to have highest F value (729.915) in ANOVA test. The mean QoL score among total 205 patients were 60.08 ± 19.06. Based on the new classification scheme, QoL was normal in 46 (22.4%) patients whereas QoL was impaired to mild level in 76 (37.1%) patients, to moderate level in 76 (37.1%) and to severe level in 7 (3.4%) patients. Role functioning, emotional functioning and social functioning was impaired to severe level in 4 (2.0%), 13 (6.3%) and 3 (1.5%) patients respectively. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 offer a comprehensive review of QoL in head and neck cancer patients. By designating the QoL score into different categories, it will become easier for clinician to have a better idea of QoL of head and neck cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":501131,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00642-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) is an important determinant of physical and mental health. QoL in head and neck cancer tends to deteriorate due to changes in the physical, functional, psychological aspects. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 is an instrument that measure the QoL specifically in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 give a numeric value to QoL of patients with high value correspond to better QoL. The aim of present study was to find out the cut-off points of numeric values of EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 to categorize QoL impairment into different categories (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). Present study also aims analyze the QoL among head and neck cancer patients under these new categories. Total 205 patients of head and neck cancer visiting to the outpatient unit were enrolled in this study. Hindi version of EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 was used to evaluate the QoL. Total 9 classification schemes were created with different cut-off points to classify the global QoL score into normal, mild, moderate and severe categories. QoL data was then analyze using the scheme having highest F value in ANOVA test. Classification scheme having cut-off values 76–100 for normal QoL, 51–75 for mild QoL impairment, 26–50 for moderate and 0–25 for severe QoL impairment found to have highest F value (729.915) in ANOVA test. The mean QoL score among total 205 patients were 60.08 ± 19.06. Based on the new classification scheme, QoL was normal in 46 (22.4%) patients whereas QoL was impaired to mild level in 76 (37.1%) patients, to moderate level in 76 (37.1%) and to severe level in 7 (3.4%) patients. Role functioning, emotional functioning and social functioning was impaired to severe level in 4 (2.0%), 13 (6.3%) and 3 (1.5%) patients respectively. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 offer a comprehensive review of QoL in head and neck cancer patients. By designating the QoL score into different categories, it will become easier for clinician to have a better idea of QoL of head and neck cancer patients.
将生活质量数值分为正常、轻度、中度和重度类别的临界点:EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 的更新版
生活质量(QoL)是身心健康的重要决定因素。头颈部癌症患者的 QoL 往往会因身体、功能和心理方面的变化而恶化。EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 是专门测量头颈部癌症患者生活质量的工具。EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 给出了患者 QoL 的数值,数值越高,QoL 越好。本研究旨在找出 EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 数值的临界点,将 QoL 损伤分为不同类别(正常、轻度、中度和重度)。本研究也旨在根据这些新类别分析头颈部癌症患者的 QoL。共有 205 名到门诊部就诊的头颈部癌症患者参与了本研究。采用印地语版 EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 评估 QoL。共创建了 9 个分类方案,采用不同的临界点将总体 QoL 分数分为正常、轻度、中度和重度。然后使用方差分析中 F 值最大的方案对 QoL 数据进行分析。在方差分析测试中,以 76-100 分为正常 QoL,51-75 分为轻度 QoL 受损,26-50 分为中度 QoL 受损,0-25 分为重度 QoL 受损的分类方案的 F 值最高(729.915)。205 名患者的平均 QoL 得分为 60.08 ± 19.06。根据新的分类方法,46 名患者(22.4%)的 QoL 值为正常,76 名患者(37.1%)的 QoL 值为轻度受损,76 名患者(37.1%)的 QoL 值为中度受损,7 名患者(3.4%)的 QoL 值为重度受损。角色功能、情绪功能和社会功能受损达到严重程度的患者分别有 4 人(2.0%)、13 人(6.3%)和 3 人(1.5%)。EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 对头颈部癌症患者的 QoL 进行了全面评估。通过将 QoL 分为不同类别,临床医生将更容易了解头颈部癌症患者的 QoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信