Development of a self-assessment tool to address the functioning of community-dwelling older adults in general practice: a validation study of the EFA23 questionnaire.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laura Rink, Caroline Floto, Katharina Apel, Maren Weiss, Elmar Stegmeier, Thomas Kühlein, Maria Sebastião
{"title":"Development of a self-assessment tool to address the functioning of community-dwelling older adults in general practice: a validation study of the EFA23 questionnaire.","authors":"Laura Rink, Caroline Floto, Katharina Apel, Maren Weiss, Elmar Stegmeier, Thomas Kühlein, Maria Sebastião","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02539-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity is increasingly prevalent among ageing patients, leading to reduced daily functioning. To address the challenges posed by multimorbidity in older adults, a person- and context-centred approach is needed. This study aimed to develop a questionnaire as a self-assessment tool for older adults focusing on functioning in general practice based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed in the development and validation of the German EFA23 (Erfassung Funktionaler Gesundheit im Alter - 23 Fragen; Assessing Functional Health in Old Age - 23 questions) questionnaire. Based on an ICF subset developed in a preparatory phase and consensus study, questionnaire items were formulated and tested in a qualitative pretest, followed by a validation study. A workshop with general practitioners (GPs) was held to develop a supplementary manual for GPs on how to interpret the questionnaire results and discuss them with the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 items were developed and tested in the qualitative pretest with 15 respondents, resulting in 37 items for the validation study. The validation study, involving 237 older adults, showed the presence of one significant principal component. It demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.967) and construct validity, showing positive correlations with established assessment tools. Descriptive statistics showed differences between the means of self-assessment by patients and an external GP assessment. The final EFA23 questionnaire consists of 23 items assessing limitations in functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EFA23 questionnaire can be used as a valid self-assessment instrument to measure functioning in older adults, supporting a person- and context-centred approach in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02539-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is increasingly prevalent among ageing patients, leading to reduced daily functioning. To address the challenges posed by multimorbidity in older adults, a person- and context-centred approach is needed. This study aimed to develop a questionnaire as a self-assessment tool for older adults focusing on functioning in general practice based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed in the development and validation of the German EFA23 (Erfassung Funktionaler Gesundheit im Alter - 23 Fragen; Assessing Functional Health in Old Age - 23 questions) questionnaire. Based on an ICF subset developed in a preparatory phase and consensus study, questionnaire items were formulated and tested in a qualitative pretest, followed by a validation study. A workshop with general practitioners (GPs) was held to develop a supplementary manual for GPs on how to interpret the questionnaire results and discuss them with the patients.

Results: A total of 69 items were developed and tested in the qualitative pretest with 15 respondents, resulting in 37 items for the validation study. The validation study, involving 237 older adults, showed the presence of one significant principal component. It demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.967) and construct validity, showing positive correlations with established assessment tools. Descriptive statistics showed differences between the means of self-assessment by patients and an external GP assessment. The final EFA23 questionnaire consists of 23 items assessing limitations in functioning.

Conclusions: The EFA23 questionnaire can be used as a valid self-assessment instrument to measure functioning in older adults, supporting a person- and context-centred approach in general practice.

开发一种自我评估工具,以解决全科医生中居住在社区的老年人的功能问题:EFA23 问卷的验证研究。
背景:在老年患者中,多病共存现象日益普遍,导致日常功能下降。为应对老年人多病带来的挑战,需要采取以人为本、因地制宜的方法。本研究旨在根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF),为老年人编制一份问卷,作为自我评估工具,重点评估老年人在全科诊疗中的功能:方法:在开发和验证德国 EFA23(Erfassung Funktionaler Gesundheit im Alter - 23 Fragen;评估老年功能性健康--23 个问题)问卷时采用了混合方法。根据在准备阶段和共识研究中开发的 ICF 子集,制定了问卷项目,并在定性预试中进行了测试,随后进行了验证研究。与全科医生(GPs)共同举办了一次研讨会,为全科医生编写了一份补充手册,指导他们如何解释问卷结果并与患者进行讨论:共制定了 69 个项目,并对 15 名受访者进行了定性预试,最终确定了 37 个项目用于验证研究。验证研究涉及 237 名老年人,结果显示存在一个重要的主成分。它具有良好的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α=0.967)和建构效度,与已有的评估工具呈正相关。描述性统计显示,患者自我评估和全科医生外部评估的平均值存在差异。最终的 EFA23 问卷由 23 个评估功能限制的项目组成:EFA23问卷可作为有效的自我评估工具,用于测量老年人的功能,支持全科医生以人为本、因地制宜的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信