Ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic surgery: First assessment of ACSAP predicting score.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Cuili Niu, Xiaowei Bai, Xiuyin Gui, Yuanzhe Liang, Ling Zhang
{"title":"Ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic surgery: First assessment of ACSAP predicting score.","authors":"Cuili Niu, Xiaowei Bai, Xiuyin Gui, Yuanzhe Liang, Ling Zhang","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_350_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to develop and validate a predictive score to estimate the post-operative recurrence risk after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma (OMA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The prediction score was developed using a training set comprising 431 patients with OMA who underwent laparoscopic surgery at our institution between January 2015 and September 2017. A follow-up period of at least 5 years was required. Clinical data were entered into least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to build a scoring system that predicted OMA recurrence. A testing set containing 185 patients from October 2017 to October 2018 was used to assess its performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on LASSO regression, the final score (ACSAP score) included five clinical predictors (0-15 points): Age, cyst size, previous surgery for OMA, revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage and post-operative pregnancy. The area under the curve values of the score were 0.741 (0.765) and 0.727 (0.795) for predicting 3-year and 5-year OMA recurrence, respectively, in the training (testing) set. The score stratified patients into three risk groups in both sets, with significant differences in the 5-year recurrence rates (low-risk, 5.3% [0%]; intermediate-risk, 20.2% [16.5%] and high-risk, 48.0% [36.5%]; P < 0.001). Moreover, patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups exhibited a significant reduction in the 5-year cumulative recurrence following a minimum of 15-month post-operative medical treatment (both P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACSAP score may be a concise and useful tool for identifying patients with a higher risk of OMA recurrence after surgery who might receive long-term post-operative medical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_350_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to develop and validate a predictive score to estimate the post-operative recurrence risk after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma (OMA).

Patients and methods: The prediction score was developed using a training set comprising 431 patients with OMA who underwent laparoscopic surgery at our institution between January 2015 and September 2017. A follow-up period of at least 5 years was required. Clinical data were entered into least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to build a scoring system that predicted OMA recurrence. A testing set containing 185 patients from October 2017 to October 2018 was used to assess its performance.

Results: Based on LASSO regression, the final score (ACSAP score) included five clinical predictors (0-15 points): Age, cyst size, previous surgery for OMA, revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage and post-operative pregnancy. The area under the curve values of the score were 0.741 (0.765) and 0.727 (0.795) for predicting 3-year and 5-year OMA recurrence, respectively, in the training (testing) set. The score stratified patients into three risk groups in both sets, with significant differences in the 5-year recurrence rates (low-risk, 5.3% [0%]; intermediate-risk, 20.2% [16.5%] and high-risk, 48.0% [36.5%]; P < 0.001). Moreover, patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups exhibited a significant reduction in the 5-year cumulative recurrence following a minimum of 15-month post-operative medical treatment (both P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The ACSAP score may be a concise and useful tool for identifying patients with a higher risk of OMA recurrence after surgery who might receive long-term post-operative medical treatment.

腹腔镜手术后卵巢子宫内膜异位症复发:首次评估 ACSAP 预测评分。
目的:我们旨在开发并验证一种预测评分,用于估算卵巢子宫内膜异位症(OMA)腹腔镜切除术后的复发风险:预测评分是通过训练集开发的,训练集包括2015年1月至2017年9月期间在我院接受腹腔镜手术的431名卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者。要求随访至少 5 年。临床数据被输入最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归,以建立预测 OMA 复发的评分系统。测试集包含2017年10月至2018年10月的185名患者,用于评估其性能:基于 LASSO 回归,最终评分(ACSAP 评分)包括五个临床预测因子(0-15 分):年龄、囊肿大小、曾接受过 OMA 手术、美国生殖医学会修订分期和术后妊娠。在训练(测试)集中,该评分预测 3 年和 5 年 OMA 复发的曲线下面积值分别为 0.741 (0.765) 和 0.727 (0.795)。该评分将两组患者分为三个风险组,5 年复发率差异显著(低风险,5.3% [0%];中风险,20.2% [16.5%];高风险,48.0% [36.5%];P < 0.001)。此外,中危和高危组患者在术后接受至少 15 个月的药物治疗后,5 年累计复发率显著降低(均为 P <0.05):ACSAP 评分可能是一种简明实用的工具,可用于识别术后 OMA 复发风险较高且可能接受术后长期药物治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信