Contraception Initiation after Early Abortion in a Family Medicine Setting: A Retrospective Chart Review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cresandra E Corbin, Anna Sliwowska, Jeffrey P Levine, Samantha Stimmel, Jennifer R Amico
{"title":"Contraception Initiation after Early Abortion in a Family Medicine Setting: A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Cresandra E Corbin, Anna Sliwowska, Jeffrey P Levine, Samantha Stimmel, Jennifer R Amico","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early abortion increasingly is provided in the primary care setting, allowing improved access, continuity of care, and contraception, if desired. We aimed in this retrospective chart review to describe postabortion contraception provision in a family medicine office.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were those patients who obtained an induced abortion during an 11-year period at a family medicine office. We documented contraception provision within 30 days of abortion and used simple proportions, Fisher exact tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests to describe differences in contraceptive provision by type of abortion and continuity status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the patients who underwent abortions (254/353, 72%) had documentation of a contraceptive method within 30 days of abortion, which was similar for patients who had either a medication (124/166, 75%) or an aspiration abortion (130/187, 70%, <i>P</i> = 0.71). The most common contraceptives were contraceptive pills (104/353, 29%) or intrauterine devices (68/353, 19%). Patients who chose a tier 1 method were more likely to have a procedure abortion (50/87, 57%), whereas patients who chose a tier 2 method were likely to have a medication abortion (83/160, 52%). Fewer than half (45%, 158/353, <i>P</i> = 0.0002) were continuity patients and established patients in the primary care office. Most tier 1 contraceptive users were continuity patients (49/87, 60%), whereas most patients without a contraceptive method were noncontinuity patients (72/99, 73%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary care setting is uniquely equipped for providing early abortion and postabortion contraception. Although the providers offered all contraceptive options to eligible patients, continuity patients were more likely to receive more effective contraception in their primary care office.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Early abortion increasingly is provided in the primary care setting, allowing improved access, continuity of care, and contraception, if desired. We aimed in this retrospective chart review to describe postabortion contraception provision in a family medicine office.

Methods: Participants were those patients who obtained an induced abortion during an 11-year period at a family medicine office. We documented contraception provision within 30 days of abortion and used simple proportions, Fisher exact tests, and χ2 tests to describe differences in contraceptive provision by type of abortion and continuity status.

Results: Most of the patients who underwent abortions (254/353, 72%) had documentation of a contraceptive method within 30 days of abortion, which was similar for patients who had either a medication (124/166, 75%) or an aspiration abortion (130/187, 70%, P = 0.71). The most common contraceptives were contraceptive pills (104/353, 29%) or intrauterine devices (68/353, 19%). Patients who chose a tier 1 method were more likely to have a procedure abortion (50/87, 57%), whereas patients who chose a tier 2 method were likely to have a medication abortion (83/160, 52%). Fewer than half (45%, 158/353, P = 0.0002) were continuity patients and established patients in the primary care office. Most tier 1 contraceptive users were continuity patients (49/87, 60%), whereas most patients without a contraceptive method were noncontinuity patients (72/99, 73%).

Conclusions: The primary care setting is uniquely equipped for providing early abortion and postabortion contraception. Although the providers offered all contraceptive options to eligible patients, continuity patients were more likely to receive more effective contraception in their primary care office.

全科医疗机构早期人工流产后的避孕措施:回顾病历
目标:早期人工流产越来越多地由初级医疗机构提供,从而提高了就诊率、医疗服务的连续性,并在需要时提供避孕措施。我们旨在通过此次回顾性病历审查来描述家庭医疗诊所提供的人工流产后避孕措施:方法:参与者为 11 年间在一家家庭医疗诊所接受人工流产的患者。我们记录了人工流产后 30 天内的避孕情况,并使用简单比例、费雪精确检验和 χ2 检验来描述不同人工流产类型和连续性状况下避孕措施提供情况的差异:大多数人工流产患者(254/353,72%)在流产后 30 天内记录了避孕方法,这与药物流产(124/166,75%)或吸宫流产(130/187,70%,P = 0.71)患者的情况相似。最常见的避孕药物是避孕药(104/353,29%)或宫内节育器(68/353,19%)。选择一级方法的患者更有可能进行手术流产(50/87,57%),而选择二级方法的患者更有可能进行药物流产(83/160,52%)。只有不到一半的患者(45%,158/353,P = 0.0002)是连续性患者和在基层医疗机构就诊的固定患者。大多数一级避孕药具使用者是连续性患者(49/87,60%),而大多数未使用避孕方法的患者是非连续性患者(72/99,73%):结论:初级保健机构在提供早期流产和流产后避孕方面具有得天独厚的优势。尽管医疗服务提供者为符合条件的患者提供了所有避孕选择,但连续性患者更有可能在初级保健诊所接受更有效的避孕措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信