Effects of insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals in patients with persistent plantar heel pain: A sham-controlled randomised trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/02692155241267991
Marina Gomes Fagundes, André Augusto Martines Teixeira Mendes, Vinícius Fernandes Bezerra, Weslley Robson Marques Silva de Freitas, Rodrigo Scattone Silva, André Pontes-Silva, Germanna de Medeiros Barbosa, Marcelo Cardoso de Souza
{"title":"Effects of insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals in patients with persistent plantar heel pain: A sham-controlled randomised trial.","authors":"Marina Gomes Fagundes, André Augusto Martines Teixeira Mendes, Vinícius Fernandes Bezerra, Weslley Robson Marques Silva de Freitas, Rodrigo Scattone Silva, André Pontes-Silva, Germanna de Medeiros Barbosa, Marcelo Cardoso de Souza","doi":"10.1177/02692155241267991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the use of custom-made insoles adapted to flip-flops on pain intensity, foot function, and functional walking ability in individuals with persistent plantar heel pain in the short and medium term.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Flip-flop sandals in patients with persistent plantar heel pain.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Participants (n = 80) were assessed at baseline, six and 12 weeks after the intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary outcomes, after 6 weeks of intervention, no between-group difference was observed in the intensity of morning pain or pain with walking, mean difference = -0.4 (95% confidence intervals = -1.5 to 0.8). Similarly, after 12 weeks of intervention, no between-group difference was observed in the intensity of morning pain or pain with walking, mean difference = -0.7 (95% confidence intervals = -1.9 to 0.6). Finally, at 4 weeks after the end of the intervention, there was no between-group difference in morning pain or pain on walking, mean difference = 0.01 (95% confidence intervals = -1.4 to 1.4). All differences and confidence intervals were smaller than the minimum clinically important difference for pain (2 points). There were no differences between the groups for the secondary outcomes. In addition, the mean differences were smaller than the minimum clinically important differences for pain intensity, foot function and functional walking ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Custom-made insoles fitted to flip-flops did not differ from flip-flops with sham insoles in improving pain intensity, foot function and functional walking ability in people with persistent heel pain.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04784598). Data of registration: 2023-01-20.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1466-1480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241267991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of custom-made insoles adapted to flip-flops on pain intensity, foot function, and functional walking ability in individuals with persistent plantar heel pain in the short and medium term.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Flip-flop sandals in patients with persistent plantar heel pain.

Main measures: Participants (n = 80) were assessed at baseline, six and 12 weeks after the intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention.

Results: For the primary outcomes, after 6 weeks of intervention, no between-group difference was observed in the intensity of morning pain or pain with walking, mean difference = -0.4 (95% confidence intervals = -1.5 to 0.8). Similarly, after 12 weeks of intervention, no between-group difference was observed in the intensity of morning pain or pain with walking, mean difference = -0.7 (95% confidence intervals = -1.9 to 0.6). Finally, at 4 weeks after the end of the intervention, there was no between-group difference in morning pain or pain on walking, mean difference = 0.01 (95% confidence intervals = -1.4 to 1.4). All differences and confidence intervals were smaller than the minimum clinically important difference for pain (2 points). There were no differences between the groups for the secondary outcomes. In addition, the mean differences were smaller than the minimum clinically important differences for pain intensity, foot function and functional walking ability.

Conclusion: Custom-made insoles fitted to flip-flops did not differ from flip-flops with sham insoles in improving pain intensity, foot function and functional walking ability in people with persistent heel pain.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04784598). Data of registration: 2023-01-20.

适应人字拖凉鞋的鞋垫对持续性足跟痛患者的影响:假对照随机试验
目的评估定制人字拖鞋垫在中短期内对持续性足跟痛患者的疼痛强度、足部功能和功能性行走能力的影响:随机对照试验:主要测量指标:对参与者(n = 80)进行基线、干预后 6 周和 12 周以及干预后 4 周的评估:就主要结果而言,干预 6 周后,晨起疼痛或行走时疼痛的强度没有观察到组间差异,平均差异 = -0.4(95% 置信区间 = -1.5 至 0.8)。同样,在干预 12 周后,晨痛或行走时疼痛的强度也没有观察到组间差异,平均差异 = -0.7(95% 置信区间 = -1.9 至 0.6)。最后,在干预结束 4 周后,晨起疼痛或行走时疼痛无组间差异,平均差异 = 0.01(95% 置信区间 = -1.4 至 1.4)。所有差异和置信区间均小于疼痛的最小临床重要差异(2 分)。在次要结果方面,各组之间没有差异。此外,在疼痛强度、足部功能和功能性行走能力方面,平均差异均小于最小临床意义差异:结论:在改善持续性足跟痛患者的疼痛强度、足部功能和功能性行走能力方面,在人字拖上安装定制鞋垫与安装假鞋垫的人字拖没有区别:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT04784598)。注册数据:2023-01-20。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信