Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years

Andrey Grin, Vasiliy Karanadze, Ivan Lvov, Anton Kordonskiy, Aleksandr Talypov, Vladimir Smirnov, Petr Zakharov
{"title":"Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years","authors":"Andrey Grin,&nbsp;Vasiliy Karanadze,&nbsp;Ivan Lvov,&nbsp;Anton Kordonskiy,&nbsp;Aleksandr Talypov,&nbsp;Vladimir Smirnov,&nbsp;Petr Zakharov","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p &lt; 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p &lt; 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"35 6","pages":"Pages 299-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849624000480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months.

Results

A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p < 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF.

Conclusions

Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.
神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者椎弓根螺钉固定的有效方法:对过去 20 年发表的研究进行系统回顾。
目的对用于治疗神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的各种椎弓根后螺钉固定(PSF)方法的研究进行系统综述,并找出最有效、最安全的方法:我们按照系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统综述,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42024531093)上进行了注册。纳入标准为(1) 出版日期为 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日;(2) 全文为英文;(3) 胸腰椎爆裂性骨折且无神经功能缺损;(4) 患者年龄超过 18 岁;(5) 有关治疗结果或并发症的报告;(6) 平均随访时间至少 12 个月:结果:共收录了 69 篇文章,涉及 116 个患者群体。我们的分析结果表明,与单节段、短节段和长节段融合术相比,不融合的短节段固定术在缩短手术时间和减少术中失血方面具有优势(P = 0.001,P = 0.002):短节段椎弓根螺钉固定可能是神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的最佳手术治疗方法。在这种情况下使用后外侧融合术可能会增加深部手术部位感染率,但不会降低植入物相关并发症的发生率,也不会改善长期治疗效果。经皮方法仍是首选技术,但对于有严重畸形的患者,在制定手术计划时应仔细考虑其有限的还原能力。在这类患者中应用中间螺钉并没有明显的优势。移除固定系统并不能显著减少与植入物相关的并发症或改善生活质量。从系统综述中获得的数据可帮助外科医生为神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者选择最合适的手术治疗方法,从而避免无效手术,改善短期和长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信