Exploring Older Adults' Perceptions of Using Digital Health Platforms for Self-Managing Musculoskeletal Health Conditions: Focus Group Study.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.2196/55693
Sophie Clohessy, Christian Kempton, Kate Ryan, Peter Grinbergs, Mark T Elliott
{"title":"Exploring Older Adults' Perceptions of Using Digital Health Platforms for Self-Managing Musculoskeletal Health Conditions: Focus Group Study.","authors":"Sophie Clohessy, Christian Kempton, Kate Ryan, Peter Grinbergs, Mark T Elliott","doi":"10.2196/55693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital technologies can assist and optimize health care processes. This is increasingly the case in the musculoskeletal health domain, where digital platforms can be used to support the self-management of musculoskeletal conditions, as well as access to services. However, given a large proportion of the population with musculoskeletal conditions are older adults (aged ≥60 years), it is important to consider the acceptability of such platforms within this demographic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore participants' opinions and perceptions on the use of digital platforms for supporting the self-management of musculoskeletal conditions within older adult (aged ≥60 years) populations and to gather their opinions on real examples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2 focus groups (focus group 1: 6/15, 40%; focus group 2: 9/15, 60%) were conducted, in which participants answered questions about their thoughts on using digital health platforms to prevent or manage musculoskeletal conditions. Participants were further presented with 2 example scenarios, which were then discussed. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Participants were aged ≥60 years and with or without current musculoskeletal conditions. Prior experience of using smartphone apps or other digital health platforms for musculoskeletal conditions was not required. Focus groups took place virtually using the Teams (Microsoft Corp) platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 themes were identified across both focus groups: \"experiences of digital health platforms,\" \"preference for human contact,\" \"barriers to accessing clinical services,\" \"individual differences and digital literacy,\" \"trust in technology,\" and \"features and benefits of digital health technologies.\" Each theme is discussed in detail based on the interview responses. The findings revealed that most participants had some existing experience with digital health platforms for preventing or managing musculoskeletal conditions. Overall, there was a lack of trust in and low expectations of quality for digital platforms for musculoskeletal health within this age group. While there was some concern about the use of digital platforms in place of in-person health consultations, several benefits were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results highlighted the need for better communication on the benefits of using digital platforms to support the self-management of musculoskeletal conditions, without the platforms replacing the role of the health care professionals. The concerns about which apps are of suitable quality and trustworthiness lead us to recommend raising public awareness around the role of organizations that verify and assess the quality of digital health platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e55693"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11327635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital technologies can assist and optimize health care processes. This is increasingly the case in the musculoskeletal health domain, where digital platforms can be used to support the self-management of musculoskeletal conditions, as well as access to services. However, given a large proportion of the population with musculoskeletal conditions are older adults (aged ≥60 years), it is important to consider the acceptability of such platforms within this demographic.

Objective: This study aims to explore participants' opinions and perceptions on the use of digital platforms for supporting the self-management of musculoskeletal conditions within older adult (aged ≥60 years) populations and to gather their opinions on real examples.

Methods: A total of 2 focus groups (focus group 1: 6/15, 40%; focus group 2: 9/15, 60%) were conducted, in which participants answered questions about their thoughts on using digital health platforms to prevent or manage musculoskeletal conditions. Participants were further presented with 2 example scenarios, which were then discussed. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Participants were aged ≥60 years and with or without current musculoskeletal conditions. Prior experience of using smartphone apps or other digital health platforms for musculoskeletal conditions was not required. Focus groups took place virtually using the Teams (Microsoft Corp) platform.

Results: A total of 6 themes were identified across both focus groups: "experiences of digital health platforms," "preference for human contact," "barriers to accessing clinical services," "individual differences and digital literacy," "trust in technology," and "features and benefits of digital health technologies." Each theme is discussed in detail based on the interview responses. The findings revealed that most participants had some existing experience with digital health platforms for preventing or managing musculoskeletal conditions. Overall, there was a lack of trust in and low expectations of quality for digital platforms for musculoskeletal health within this age group. While there was some concern about the use of digital platforms in place of in-person health consultations, several benefits were also identified.

Conclusions: Results highlighted the need for better communication on the benefits of using digital platforms to support the self-management of musculoskeletal conditions, without the platforms replacing the role of the health care professionals. The concerns about which apps are of suitable quality and trustworthiness lead us to recommend raising public awareness around the role of organizations that verify and assess the quality of digital health platforms.

探索老年人对使用数字健康平台自我管理肌肉骨骼健康状况的看法:焦点小组研究。
背景:数字技术可以辅助和优化医疗保健流程。在肌肉骨骼健康领域,数字平台越来越多地用于支持肌肉骨骼疾病的自我管理和获取服务。然而,由于大部分患有肌肉骨骼疾病的人群都是老年人(年龄≥60 岁),因此考虑此类平台在这一人群中的可接受性非常重要:本研究旨在探讨参与者对使用数字平台支持老年人(年龄≥60 岁)肌肉骨骼疾病自我管理的意见和看法,并收集他们对真实案例的意见:共开展了 2 个焦点小组(焦点小组 1:6/15,占 40%;焦点小组 2:9/15,占 60%),参与者回答了有关使用数字健康平台预防或管理肌肉骨骼疾病的想法的问题。参与者还进一步了解了两个示例情景,然后进行了讨论。对访谈进行了录音、转录和专题分析。参与者年龄≥60 岁,是否患有肌肉骨骼疾病。参与者不需要有使用智能手机应用程序或其他数字健康平台治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的经验。焦点小组使用 Teams(微软公司)平台进行虚拟讨论:两个焦点小组共确定了 6 个主题:结果:两个焦点小组共确定了 6 个主题:"数字医疗平台的体验"、"对人际接触的偏好"、"获得临床服务的障碍"、"个体差异和数字素养"、"对技术的信任 "以及 "数字医疗技术的特点和优势"。我们将根据访谈回答对每个主题进行详细讨论。调查结果显示,大多数参与者都有使用数字医疗平台预防或管理肌肉骨骼疾病的经验。总体而言,这个年龄组的人对用于肌肉骨骼健康的数字平台缺乏信任,对其质量的期望也不高。虽然人们对使用数字平台取代面对面的健康咨询表示担忧,但也发现了一些好处:结论:研究结果表明,需要更好地宣传使用数字平台支持肌肉骨骼疾病自我管理的益处,而不能让数字平台取代医疗保健专业人员的作用。关于哪些应用程序具有适当的质量和可信度,我们建议提高公众对验证和评估数字健康平台质量的组织作用的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信