Task shifting for musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative interview study of general practitioners and specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kenneth Chance-Larsen, Michael Backhouse, Richard Collier, Tobba Sudmann
{"title":"Task shifting for musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative interview study of general practitioners and specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists.","authors":"Kenneth Chance-Larsen, Michael Backhouse, Richard Collier, Tobba Sudmann","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2384043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the views of general practitioners and physiotherapists on the current model of care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care, and if the English First Contact Practitioner model, where patients have access to multiple professional groups with musculoskeletal health expertise, could inform service development.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and subjects: </strong>We analysed interviews with five GPs and 11 physiotherapists and used Lipsky's theories about street-level bureaucracy and Foucault's theories of mechanisms of power and institutional structures to explore task shifting and cooperation between different professions.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>The empirical material reflected a multi-faceted discourse about skill-mix in primary care, where financial factors, perceptions about competence, and task preferences moderated attitudes to task shifting. Competition and cooperation coexist between the professions, and the seemingly gradual blurring between historical hegemony and new models of care creates both alliances and rivalries. Examples of deviations from the Choosing Wisely principles and evidence-based practice indicate that both general practitioners and physiotherapists balance the roles of patient advocate, gatekeeper, and <i>homo economicus</i>, in a context where task shifting is challenged by established practice. It appears that the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders is fragmented and to some extent reflects a supply-driven system.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2384043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the views of general practitioners and physiotherapists on the current model of care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care, and if the English First Contact Practitioner model, where patients have access to multiple professional groups with musculoskeletal health expertise, could inform service development.

Design, setting, and subjects: We analysed interviews with five GPs and 11 physiotherapists and used Lipsky's theories about street-level bureaucracy and Foucault's theories of mechanisms of power and institutional structures to explore task shifting and cooperation between different professions.

Results and interpretation: The empirical material reflected a multi-faceted discourse about skill-mix in primary care, where financial factors, perceptions about competence, and task preferences moderated attitudes to task shifting. Competition and cooperation coexist between the professions, and the seemingly gradual blurring between historical hegemony and new models of care creates both alliances and rivalries. Examples of deviations from the Choosing Wisely principles and evidence-based practice indicate that both general practitioners and physiotherapists balance the roles of patient advocate, gatekeeper, and homo economicus, in a context where task shifting is challenged by established practice. It appears that the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders is fragmented and to some extent reflects a supply-driven system.

挪威基层医疗机构肌肉骨骼疾病的任务转移:对全科医生和肌肉骨骼专科物理治疗师的定性访谈研究。
目的探讨全科医生和物理治疗师对挪威基层医疗机构目前肌肉骨骼疾病患者护理模式的看法,以及英国的 "第一接触医师 "模式(患者可接触到多个具有肌肉骨骼健康专业知识的专业团体)能否为服务发展提供参考:我们分析了对 5 名全科医生和 11 名物理治疗师的访谈,并利用利普斯基关于街道官僚主义的理论以及福柯关于权力机制和制度结构的理论来探讨不同专业之间的任务转移与合作:实证材料反映了关于初级保健中技能组合的多方面讨论,其中财务因素、对能力的看法和任务偏好调节了对任务转移的态度。各专业之间的竞争与合作并存,历史霸权与新的医疗模式之间似乎逐渐模糊,这既造成了联盟,也造成了竞争。偏离 "明智选择 "原则和循证实践的例子表明,在任务转移受到既定实践挑战的情况下,全科医生和物理治疗师都要平衡病人权益维护者、守门人和经济人的角色。对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的管理似乎是分散的,并在一定程度上反映了供应驱动的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信