Matthew R Muschett, Celeste Ewig, Earl Morris, Lauren E Adkins, Amie Goodin, Joshua Brown
{"title":"A Review of Concordance and Quality in Clinical Guidelines for Hormonal Contraceptives to Mitigate Drug-Drug Interactions in Women With Epilepsy.","authors":"Matthew R Muschett, Celeste Ewig, Earl Morris, Lauren E Adkins, Amie Goodin, Joshua Brown","doi":"10.1002/pds.5861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concomitant use of hormonal contraceptive agents (HCAs) and enzyme-inducting antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) may lead to contraceptive failure and unintended pregnancy. This review identified and evaluated concordance and quality of clinical treatment guidelines related to the use of HCAs in women with epilepsy (WWE) receiving EIAEDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant clinical guidelines were identified across four databases and were independently evaluated for quality utilizing the AGREE-II protocol instrument. Quality in this context is defined as the rigor and transparency of the methodologies used to develop the guideline. Guidelines were further assessed in terms of concordance and discordance with the latest body of knowledge concerning the use of hormonal contraception in the presence of EIAEDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n = 5 guidelines were retrieved and evaluated. Overall guideline scores ranged from 17% to 92%, while individual domain scores ranged from 0% to 100%. Contraceptive guidelines consistently recommended the use of intrauterine systems and long-acting injectables in the presence of EIAEDs, recommended against the use of oral, transdermal, and vaginal ring contraceptives, and differed regarding recommendations related to implants. Guidelines agreed regarding recommendations that women treated with EIAEDs should receive intrauterine systems and long-acting injectables; however, the suggested frequency of administration of injectable contraceptives differed. The use of intrauterine systems in this population is supported by evidence, but there is uncertainty surrounding the use of long-acting injectables and contraceptive implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To mitigate the risk of unintended pregnancy and its consequences, recommendations related to implants and long-acting injectable contraceptives should be evidence-based.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 8","pages":"e5861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Concomitant use of hormonal contraceptive agents (HCAs) and enzyme-inducting antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) may lead to contraceptive failure and unintended pregnancy. This review identified and evaluated concordance and quality of clinical treatment guidelines related to the use of HCAs in women with epilepsy (WWE) receiving EIAEDs.
Methods: Relevant clinical guidelines were identified across four databases and were independently evaluated for quality utilizing the AGREE-II protocol instrument. Quality in this context is defined as the rigor and transparency of the methodologies used to develop the guideline. Guidelines were further assessed in terms of concordance and discordance with the latest body of knowledge concerning the use of hormonal contraception in the presence of EIAEDs.
Results: A total of n = 5 guidelines were retrieved and evaluated. Overall guideline scores ranged from 17% to 92%, while individual domain scores ranged from 0% to 100%. Contraceptive guidelines consistently recommended the use of intrauterine systems and long-acting injectables in the presence of EIAEDs, recommended against the use of oral, transdermal, and vaginal ring contraceptives, and differed regarding recommendations related to implants. Guidelines agreed regarding recommendations that women treated with EIAEDs should receive intrauterine systems and long-acting injectables; however, the suggested frequency of administration of injectable contraceptives differed. The use of intrauterine systems in this population is supported by evidence, but there is uncertainty surrounding the use of long-acting injectables and contraceptive implants.
Conclusions: To mitigate the risk of unintended pregnancy and its consequences, recommendations related to implants and long-acting injectable contraceptives should be evidence-based.
期刊介绍：
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
