Oncology stewardship practice in the United States: A Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association national survey.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Marisela Tan Banez, Sol Atienza, Allison Butts, Megan Derba, Katie Dicke, Kimberly Haverstick, Bernadette B Heron, Sarah K Cimino, Matthew Shane Loop, Shannon Hough, Julianna A Merten, Donald C Moore, Vishal Shah, Kate D Taucher, Junyu Matt Zhang, Zahra Mahmoudjafari
{"title":"Oncology stewardship practice in the United States: A Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association national survey.","authors":"Marisela Tan Banez, Sol Atienza, Allison Butts, Megan Derba, Katie Dicke, Kimberly Haverstick, Bernadette B Heron, Sarah K Cimino, Matthew Shane Loop, Shannon Hough, Julianna A Merten, Donald C Moore, Vishal Shah, Kate D Taucher, Junyu Matt Zhang, Zahra Mahmoudjafari","doi":"10.1177/10781552241265280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of cancer is associated with high risk for toxicity and high cost. Strategies to enhance the value, quality, and safety of cancer care are often managed independently of one another. Oncology stewardship is a potential framework to unify these efforts and enhance outcomes. This landscape survey establishes baseline information on oncology stewardship in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) distributed a 38-item survey composed of demographic, institutional, clinical decision-making, support staff, metrics, and technology sections to 675 HOPA members between 9 September 2022 and 9 October 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most organizations (78%) have adopted general pharmacy stewardship practices; however, only 31% reported having established a formalized oncology stewardship team. More than 70% of respondents reported implementation of biosimilars, formulary management, and dose rounding as oncology stewardship initiatives in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Frequently cited barriers to oncology stewardship included lack of clinical pharmacist availability (74%), lack of oncology stewardship training (62%), lack of physician/provider buy-in (32%), and lack of cost-saving metrics (33%). Only 6.6% of survey respondents reported their organization had defined \"value in oncology.\" Lack of a formalized stewardship program was most often cited (77%) as the rationale for not defining value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than one-third of respondents have established oncology stewardship programs; however, most are providing oncology stewardship practices. This manuscript serves as a call to action for stakeholders to work together to formalize oncology stewardship programs that optimize value, quality, and safety for patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241265280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of cancer is associated with high risk for toxicity and high cost. Strategies to enhance the value, quality, and safety of cancer care are often managed independently of one another. Oncology stewardship is a potential framework to unify these efforts and enhance outcomes. This landscape survey establishes baseline information on oncology stewardship in the United States.

Methods: The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) distributed a 38-item survey composed of demographic, institutional, clinical decision-making, support staff, metrics, and technology sections to 675 HOPA members between 9 September 2022 and 9 October 2022.

Results: Most organizations (78%) have adopted general pharmacy stewardship practices; however, only 31% reported having established a formalized oncology stewardship team. More than 70% of respondents reported implementation of biosimilars, formulary management, and dose rounding as oncology stewardship initiatives in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Frequently cited barriers to oncology stewardship included lack of clinical pharmacist availability (74%), lack of oncology stewardship training (62%), lack of physician/provider buy-in (32%), and lack of cost-saving metrics (33%). Only 6.6% of survey respondents reported their organization had defined "value in oncology." Lack of a formalized stewardship program was most often cited (77%) as the rationale for not defining value.

Conclusions: Less than one-third of respondents have established oncology stewardship programs; however, most are providing oncology stewardship practices. This manuscript serves as a call to action for stakeholders to work together to formalize oncology stewardship programs that optimize value, quality, and safety for patients with cancer.

美国的肿瘤管理实践:血液学/肿瘤学药学协会全国调查。
简介癌症治疗具有高毒性和高成本风险。提高癌症治疗的价值、质量和安全性的策略往往是相互独立管理的。肿瘤治疗监管是一个潜在的框架,可将这些工作统一起来并提高治疗效果。这项前景调查确定了美国肿瘤管理的基线信息:血液学/肿瘤学药学协会(HOPA)在 2022 年 9 月 9 日至 2022 年 10 月 9 日期间向 675 名 HOPA 会员发放了一份包含 38 个项目的调查问卷,调查内容包括人口统计、机构、临床决策、支持人员、指标和技术等部分:大多数机构(78%)都采用了一般的药学监管实践;但是,只有 31% 的机构表示已经建立了正式的肿瘤药学监管团队。超过 70% 的受访者表示在住院和门诊环境中实施了生物仿制药、处方集管理和剂量查房等肿瘤管理措施。经常提到的肿瘤学指导障碍包括缺乏临床药师(74%)、缺乏肿瘤学指导培训(62%)、缺乏医生/医疗服务提供者的支持(32%)以及缺乏成本节约指标(33%)。只有 6.6% 的受访者表示他们的组织定义了 "肿瘤学价值"。未定义价值的理由中最常见的是缺乏正式的监管计划(77%):结论:不到三分之一的受访者制定了肿瘤学监管计划;但是,大多数受访者正在开展肿瘤学监管实践。本手稿呼吁各利益相关方共同努力,正式制定肿瘤学监管计划,为癌症患者优化价值、质量和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信