Heidi Cope, Ryan Fischer, Emma Heslop, Megan McNiff, Alexandra Johnson, Eric Camino, Brian Denger, Niki Armstrong, Sejal Thakrar, Alison Bateman-House, Katherine L Beaverson, Ione O C Woollacott, Dawn Phillips, Vivian Fernandez, Annie Ganot, Roxana Donisa-Dreghici, Carol Mansfield, Holly Peay
{"title":"Clinician Perspectives of Gene Therapy as a Treatment Option for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.","authors":"Heidi Cope, Ryan Fischer, Emma Heslop, Megan McNiff, Alexandra Johnson, Eric Camino, Brian Denger, Niki Armstrong, Sejal Thakrar, Alison Bateman-House, Katherine L Beaverson, Ione O C Woollacott, Dawn Phillips, Vivian Fernandez, Annie Ganot, Roxana Donisa-Dreghici, Carol Mansfield, Holly Peay","doi":"10.3233/JND-240033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, life-limiting, neuromuscular disorder. Clinicians play an important role in informing families about therapy options, including approved gene therapies and clinical trials of unapproved therapies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand the perspectives of clinicians about gene therapy for DMD, which has not previously been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with specialist clinicians treating patients with DMD in the United States (n = 8) and United Kingdom (n = 8). Interviews were completed in 2022, before any approved gene therapies, to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implementing gene therapy and educational needs of clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents expressed cautious optimism about gene therapy. Responses varied regarding potential benefits with most expecting delayed progression and duration of benefit (1 year to lifelong). Concern about anticipated risks also varied; types of anticipated risks included immunological reactions, liver toxicity, and cardiac or renal dysfunction. Clinicians generally, but not uniformly, understood that gene therapy for DMD would not be curative. Most reported needing demonstrable clinical benefit to justify treatment-related risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrate variability in knowledge and attitudes about gene therapy among clinicians who follow patients with DMD. As our knowledge base about DMD gene therapy grows, clinician education is vital to ensuring that accurate information is communicated to patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":16536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1085-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-240033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive, life-limiting, neuromuscular disorder. Clinicians play an important role in informing families about therapy options, including approved gene therapies and clinical trials of unapproved therapies.
Objective: This study aimed to understand the perspectives of clinicians about gene therapy for DMD, which has not previously been studied.
Methods: We conducted interviews with specialist clinicians treating patients with DMD in the United States (n = 8) and United Kingdom (n = 8). Interviews were completed in 2022, before any approved gene therapies, to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implementing gene therapy and educational needs of clinicians.
Results: Most respondents expressed cautious optimism about gene therapy. Responses varied regarding potential benefits with most expecting delayed progression and duration of benefit (1 year to lifelong). Concern about anticipated risks also varied; types of anticipated risks included immunological reactions, liver toxicity, and cardiac or renal dysfunction. Clinicians generally, but not uniformly, understood that gene therapy for DMD would not be curative. Most reported needing demonstrable clinical benefit to justify treatment-related risks.
Conclusions: Our data demonstrate variability in knowledge and attitudes about gene therapy among clinicians who follow patients with DMD. As our knowledge base about DMD gene therapy grows, clinician education is vital to ensuring that accurate information is communicated to patients and families.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases aims to facilitate progress in understanding the molecular genetics/correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, diagnosis and treatment of acquired and genetic neuromuscular diseases (including muscular dystrophy, myasthenia gravis, spinal muscular atrophy, neuropathies, myopathies, myotonias and myositis). The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, letters-to-the-editor, and will consider research that has negative findings. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational and clinical research that will improve our fundamental understanding and lead to effective treatments of neuromuscular diseases.