Explaining Seeking, Scanning, and Avoidance of Information About the Mammography-Screening: Results of a Two-Wave Online Survey with a Stratified Sample of Women.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2385782
Elena Link, Paula Stehr, Constanze Rossmann
{"title":"Explaining Seeking, Scanning, and Avoidance of Information About the Mammography-Screening: Results of a Two-Wave Online Survey with a Stratified Sample of Women.","authors":"Elena Link, Paula Stehr, Constanze Rossmann","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2385782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whether individuals engage with or avoid health information and which sources are used is crucial for informed decision-making about mammography. Therefore, we aim to develop a typology of mammography-related information behaviors and explore their determinants, which were derived from the Theory of Motivated Information Management (TMIM). Based on a two-wave online survey of a sample of German women aged 40 to 69 years (<i>N</i> = 1,138), a cluster analysis resulted in five person-centric types of information behavior that cover respondents' variety of engagement with mammography-related information: The <i>seekers</i>, the <i>scanners</i>, the <i>avoiders</i>, the <i>involved</i>, and the <i>inactive</i>. The types indicated that most individuals possess a high preference for one strategy of information behavior. Looking at the determinants of belonging to a particular type of information behavior, it becomes apparent that the factors of the TMIM have only limited explanatory power. The most relevant factors in distinguishing the types of information behaviors are benefit perceptions, worry, interest, avoidance efficacy, seeking, and avoidance-related outcome expectancies. <i>Scanners</i> and <i>seekers</i> had higher benefit perceptions. <i>Seekers</i> were further motivated by greater worries, while <i>involved</i> ones felt more interested and held stronger expectancies. <i>Avoiders</i> were more anxious and had a higher avoidance efficacy. The study suggests that <i>inactive individuals</i> and <i>avoiders</i> are highly prevalent and relevant target groups for health interventions that support informed decision-making. To facilitate informed decision-making, women should be encouraged to weigh benefits and harms of their options and to address negative emotions, such as anxiety, that may exist or arise during decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1030-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2385782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether individuals engage with or avoid health information and which sources are used is crucial for informed decision-making about mammography. Therefore, we aim to develop a typology of mammography-related information behaviors and explore their determinants, which were derived from the Theory of Motivated Information Management (TMIM). Based on a two-wave online survey of a sample of German women aged 40 to 69 years (N = 1,138), a cluster analysis resulted in five person-centric types of information behavior that cover respondents' variety of engagement with mammography-related information: The seekers, the scanners, the avoiders, the involved, and the inactive. The types indicated that most individuals possess a high preference for one strategy of information behavior. Looking at the determinants of belonging to a particular type of information behavior, it becomes apparent that the factors of the TMIM have only limited explanatory power. The most relevant factors in distinguishing the types of information behaviors are benefit perceptions, worry, interest, avoidance efficacy, seeking, and avoidance-related outcome expectancies. Scanners and seekers had higher benefit perceptions. Seekers were further motivated by greater worries, while involved ones felt more interested and held stronger expectancies. Avoiders were more anxious and had a higher avoidance efficacy. The study suggests that inactive individuals and avoiders are highly prevalent and relevant target groups for health interventions that support informed decision-making. To facilitate informed decision-making, women should be encouraged to weigh benefits and harms of their options and to address negative emotions, such as anxiety, that may exist or arise during decision-making.

寻求、扫描和回避乳腺 X 射线摄影筛查信息的原因:对分层妇女样本进行两波在线调查的结果。
个人是接触还是回避健康信息,以及使用哪些信息来源,对于乳腺放射摄影的知情决策至关重要。因此,我们从信息管理动机理论(TMIM)出发,旨在建立乳腺 X 射线照相术相关信息行为的类型学,并探讨其决定因素。我们对 40 至 69 岁的德国女性进行了两波在线调查(样本数 = 1,138),通过聚类分析得出了五种以人为中心的信息行为类型,涵盖了受访者参与乳腺 X 射线照相术相关信息的各种情况:寻求者、扫描者、回避者、参与者和不活跃者。这些类型表明,大多数人都非常偏好一种信息行为策略。从属于某一特定信息行为类型的决定因素来看,TMIM 的因素显然只能起到有限的解释作用。与区分信息行为类型最相关的因素是利益认知、担忧、兴趣、回避效能、寻求和与回避相关的结果预期。扫描者和寻求者都有较高的利益认知。寻求者更多地受到担忧的驱使,而卷入者则更感兴趣,并抱有更强烈的期望。回避者更焦虑,回避效能更高。这项研究表明,不活跃者和回避者是非常普遍的人群,也是支持知情决策的健康干预措施的相关目标群体。为促进知情决策,应鼓励妇女权衡各种选择的利弊,并解决决策过程中可能存在或出现的负面情绪,如焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信