Emergency department staff opinion on newly introduced phlebotomy services in the department. A cross-sectional study incorporating thematic analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Abdi D Osman DrPH, Daryl Yeak MBBS, Michael Ben-Meir MBBS, MBA, George Braitberg MBBS, MHlthServMt
{"title":"Emergency department staff opinion on newly introduced phlebotomy services in the department. A cross-sectional study incorporating thematic analysis","authors":"Abdi D Osman DrPH,&nbsp;Daryl Yeak MBBS,&nbsp;Michael Ben-Meir MBBS, MBA,&nbsp;George Braitberg MBBS, MHlthServMt","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The demand for ED services, both in terms of patient numbers and complexity has risen over the past decades. According to reports, there has been an increase in the ED patient presentation rate from 330 per 1000 to 334 per 1000 between 2018–2019 and 2022–2023. Consequently, new care models have been introduced to address this surge in demand, mitigate associated risks and improve overall safety. Among these models is the concept of ‘front loading’ clinical care, involving the initiation of interventions at the point of arrival. The present study evaluates the impact of introducing phlebotomists at triage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling at a single quaternary metropolitan ED with an annual census of greater than 90 000, encompassing all clinical staff in the ED. The survey data were analysed quantitatively and complemented by a thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The response rate for the questionnaire was 61% (<i>n</i> = 207), with good representation from all ED craft groups. Nearly all the staff (99.5%) reported being aware of the presence of phlebotomists in the ED, whereas only 57% of the staff reported working in triage (<i>P</i> = 0.05, 0.00 to 0.04). ‘Valuable/vital resource’ featured as a common response. Early decision-making, patient safety, staff and patient satisfaction emerged as consistent themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Staff expressed satisfaction that patient care now begins in the waiting room, especially after extended waiting periods prior to cubicle allocation. They assert that this improvement significantly enhances timely treatment and disposition decisions, as well as overall patient satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14476","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The demand for ED services, both in terms of patient numbers and complexity has risen over the past decades. According to reports, there has been an increase in the ED patient presentation rate from 330 per 1000 to 334 per 1000 between 2018–2019 and 2022–2023. Consequently, new care models have been introduced to address this surge in demand, mitigate associated risks and improve overall safety. Among these models is the concept of ‘front loading’ clinical care, involving the initiation of interventions at the point of arrival. The present study evaluates the impact of introducing phlebotomists at triage.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling at a single quaternary metropolitan ED with an annual census of greater than 90 000, encompassing all clinical staff in the ED. The survey data were analysed quantitatively and complemented by a thematic analysis.

Results

The response rate for the questionnaire was 61% (n = 207), with good representation from all ED craft groups. Nearly all the staff (99.5%) reported being aware of the presence of phlebotomists in the ED, whereas only 57% of the staff reported working in triage (P = 0.05, 0.00 to 0.04). ‘Valuable/vital resource’ featured as a common response. Early decision-making, patient safety, staff and patient satisfaction emerged as consistent themes.

Conclusions

Staff expressed satisfaction that patient care now begins in the waiting room, especially after extended waiting periods prior to cubicle allocation. They assert that this improvement significantly enhances timely treatment and disposition decisions, as well as overall patient satisfaction.

急诊科员工对该科新引入的抽血服务的看法。一项结合专题分析的横断面研究。
目的:在过去的几十年里,急诊室服务的需求在患者人数和复杂性方面都有所上升。据报道,在 2018-2019 年至 2022-2023 年期间,急诊室病人就诊率从每 1000 人中 330 人增加到每 1000 人中 334 人。因此,新的护理模式应运而生,以应对激增的需求、降低相关风险并提高整体安全性。这些模式中包括 "前置 "临床护理的概念,即在患者到达时即启动干预措施。本研究评估了在分流时引入抽血员的影响:方法:我们在一个年人口普查超过 90,000 人的大都市四级急诊室进行了有目的抽样横断面调查,调查对象包括急诊室的所有临床工作人员。对调查数据进行了定量分析,并辅以专题分析:调查问卷的回复率为 61%(n = 207),来自急诊室各专业组的代表性良好。几乎所有员工(99.5%)都表示知道急诊室有抽血员,但只有 57% 的员工表示在分诊室工作(P = 0.05,0.00 至 0.04)。宝贵/重要的资源 "是常见的回答。早期决策、患者安全、员工和患者满意度是一致的主题:工作人员对病人护理现在从候诊室开始表示满意,尤其是在分配隔间之前的长时间等待之后。他们认为,这一改进大大提高了治疗和处置决策的及时性,并提高了患者的整体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信