Regimes of truth regarding 'sexual justice' in academic literature from 2012 to 2022: a scoping review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Pedro Pinto, Catriona Ida Macleod, Megaera Jones
{"title":"Regimes of truth regarding 'sexual justice' in academic literature from 2012 to 2022: a scoping review.","authors":"Pedro Pinto, Catriona Ida Macleod, Megaera Jones","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2024.2386051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The notion of 'sexual justice' has gained traction in academic and policy arenas in recent years. This paper presents a scoping literature review of the regimes of truth, following Foucault, of 'sexual justice' appearing in the scientific literature from 2012 to 2022. Thirty-eight papers were coded using (1) content analysis of the studies' central problematics, the programmes referred to, and institutional location(s); and (2) thematic analysis of how the notion was deployed. Central problematics centred on (1) critiques of, or alternatives to, dominant approaches to sexual and reproductive health; and (2) highlighting injustices. As such, 'sexual justice' is fighting for legitimacy in the truth stakes. There is a distinct paucity of papers tackling the translation of 'sexual justice' into practice. South Africa dominates as the site in which papers on 'sexual justice' have been produced, but there is a lack of South-South collaboration. Two themes were apparent around which conceptions of sexual justice cohere. Firstly, sexual justice is seen as a vital, yet politically ambivalent <i>goal</i>, with neoliberal co-optation of progressive rights agendas being warned against. Secondly, sexual justice is viewed as a <i>means</i>, in which sexual justice is described as having potential to repair established frameworks' shortcomings and oppressive legacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2024.2386051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of 'sexual justice' has gained traction in academic and policy arenas in recent years. This paper presents a scoping literature review of the regimes of truth, following Foucault, of 'sexual justice' appearing in the scientific literature from 2012 to 2022. Thirty-eight papers were coded using (1) content analysis of the studies' central problematics, the programmes referred to, and institutional location(s); and (2) thematic analysis of how the notion was deployed. Central problematics centred on (1) critiques of, or alternatives to, dominant approaches to sexual and reproductive health; and (2) highlighting injustices. As such, 'sexual justice' is fighting for legitimacy in the truth stakes. There is a distinct paucity of papers tackling the translation of 'sexual justice' into practice. South Africa dominates as the site in which papers on 'sexual justice' have been produced, but there is a lack of South-South collaboration. Two themes were apparent around which conceptions of sexual justice cohere. Firstly, sexual justice is seen as a vital, yet politically ambivalent goal, with neoliberal co-optation of progressive rights agendas being warned against. Secondly, sexual justice is viewed as a means, in which sexual justice is described as having potential to repair established frameworks' shortcomings and oppressive legacies.

2012 年至 2022 年学术文献中有关 "性正义 "的真相制度:范围审查。
近年来,"性正义 "这一概念在学术和政策领域获得了广泛关注。本文按照福柯的观点,对 2012 年至 2022 年科学文献中出现的 "性正义 "真理体系进行了范围性文献综述。本文对 38 篇论文进行了编码,采用的方法包括:(1)对研究的中心问题、提及的计划和机构地点进行内容分析;(2)对如何运用这一概念进行主题分析。中心问题集中在:(1) 对性健康和生殖健康主流方法的批判或替代;(2) 强调不公正。因此,"性正义 "正在为真理的合法性而战。将 "性正义 "转化为实践的论文明显不足。南非是发表 "性正义 "论文的主要国家,但缺乏南南合作。性正义的概念主要围绕两个主题。首先,性正义被视为一个重要的、但在政治上矛盾的目标,新自由主义对进步权利议程的收编受到了警告。其次,性正义被视为一种手段,性正义被描述为有可能弥补既定框架的缺陷和压迫性遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信