Allied rehabilitation using caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation for stroke (ARMed4Stroke): A randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1177/02692155241261700
Marijn Mulder, Corien Dm Nikamp, Erik C Prinsen, Rinske Hm Nijland, Matthijs van Dorp, Jaap Buurke, Gert Kwakkel, Erwin Eh van Wegen
{"title":"Allied rehabilitation using caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation for stroke (ARMed4Stroke): A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Marijn Mulder, Corien Dm Nikamp, Erik C Prinsen, Rinske Hm Nijland, Matthijs van Dorp, Jaap Buurke, Gert Kwakkel, Erwin Eh van Wegen","doi":"10.1177/02692155241261700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the added value of caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation in addition to usual care compared to usual care alone on the self-reported mobility outcome after subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre, observer-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial. An off-site researcher allocated treatments using minimisation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-one patient-caregiver dyads within 3 months poststroke.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Eight-week blended care program with caregiver-mediated mobility exercises for 2.5 h per week supported by telerehabilitation and four face-to-face sessions in addition to usual care.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Self-reported mobility domain of the Stroke Impact Scale postintervention. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome, dyads' psychosocial wellbeing, care transition to the community postintervention and after 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one dyads (21 intervention, 20 control) were randomised, and 37 (N = 18; N = 19) were analysed following intention-to-treat. The Stroke Impact Scale mobility was not significantly different between groups postintervention (B 0.8, 95% CI -6.8-8.5, <i>p</i> = 0.826). The secondary outcomes, namely, (a) caregivers' quality of life postintervention (<i>p </i>= 0.013), (b) caregivers' symptoms of depression postintervention (<i>p </i>= 0.025), and (c) independence in leisurely activities at 6 months (<i>p </i>= 0.024), showed significant benefits in favour of caregiver-mediated exercises with telerehabilitation. A significant difference favouring controls was found in self-reported muscle strength at 6 months (<i>p </i>= 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation yielded no differential effect on our primary outcome self-reported mobility. Although the trial is underpowered, current findings are in line with previous trials. Future studies should further explore beneficial effects of caregiver involvement in stroke rehabilitation targeting psychosocial wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1321-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241261700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the added value of caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation in addition to usual care compared to usual care alone on the self-reported mobility outcome after subacute stroke.

Design: Multicentre, observer-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial. An off-site researcher allocated treatments using minimisation.

Setting: Four rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands.

Participants: Forty-one patient-caregiver dyads within 3 months poststroke.

Intervention: Eight-week blended care program with caregiver-mediated mobility exercises for 2.5 h per week supported by telerehabilitation and four face-to-face sessions in addition to usual care.

Main measures: Self-reported mobility domain of the Stroke Impact Scale postintervention. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome, dyads' psychosocial wellbeing, care transition to the community postintervention and after 6 months.

Results: Forty-one dyads (21 intervention, 20 control) were randomised, and 37 (N = 18; N = 19) were analysed following intention-to-treat. The Stroke Impact Scale mobility was not significantly different between groups postintervention (B 0.8, 95% CI -6.8-8.5, p = 0.826). The secondary outcomes, namely, (a) caregivers' quality of life postintervention (p = 0.013), (b) caregivers' symptoms of depression postintervention (p = 0.025), and (c) independence in leisurely activities at 6 months (p = 0.024), showed significant benefits in favour of caregiver-mediated exercises with telerehabilitation. A significant difference favouring controls was found in self-reported muscle strength at 6 months (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation yielded no differential effect on our primary outcome self-reported mobility. Although the trial is underpowered, current findings are in line with previous trials. Future studies should further explore beneficial effects of caregiver involvement in stroke rehabilitation targeting psychosocial wellbeing.

中风远程康复(ARMed4Stroke):随机对照试验。
目的评估在常规护理基础上结合远程康复的护理人员介导的运动与单纯的常规护理相比,对亚急性中风后自我报告的活动能力结果的附加价值:多中心、观察者盲法、平行随机对照试验。场外研究人员采用最小化方法分配治疗:地点:荷兰的四个康复中心:干预措施:干预措施:为期八周的混合护理计划,每周进行2.5小时由护理人员指导的活动能力练习,并在远程康复和四次面对面课程的支持下,对常规护理进行补充:主要测量指标:干预后中风影响量表中自我报告的行动能力领域。次要结果为功能结果、双人社会心理健康、干预后和6个月后向社区的护理过渡:41对夫妇(21个干预组,20个对照组)接受了随机干预,37对夫妇(N = 18;N = 19)接受了意向治疗分析。干预后,干预组与对照组的卒中影响量表活动度无明显差异(B 0.8,95% CI -6.8-8.5,P = 0.826)。次要结果,即(a) 干预后护理人员的生活质量(p = 0.013),(b) 干预后护理人员的抑郁症状(p = 0.025),以及(c) 6 个月后在休闲活动中的独立性(p = 0.024),均显示护理人员通过远程康复训练进行锻炼有明显的获益。在 6 个月时,自我报告的肌肉力量与对照组有明显差异(p = 0.002):结论:以护理人员为主导的锻炼与远程康复相结合,对我们的主要结果--自我报告的活动能力--没有产生不同的影响。尽管该试验的力量不足,但目前的研究结果与之前的试验结果一致。未来的研究应进一步探讨护理人员参与中风康复对社会心理健康的有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信