{"title":"Electroencephalographic Measures of Delirium in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Maria J Bruzzone, Benjamin Chapin, Jessie Walker, Marcos Santana, Yue Wang, Shawna Amini, Faith Kimmet, Estefania Perera, Clio Rubinos, Franchesca Arias, Catherine Price","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is frequent in older adults and is associated with adverse cognitive and functional outcomes. In the last several decades, there has been an increased interest in exploring tools that easily allow the early recognition of patients at risk of developing POD. The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a widely available tool used to understand delirium pathophysiology, and its use in the perioperative setting has grown exponentially, particularly to predict and detect POD. We performed a systematic review to investigate the use of EEG in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative settings. We identified 371 studies, and 56 met the inclusion criteria. A range of techniques was used to obtain EEG data, from limited 1-4 channel setups to complex 256-channel systems. Power spectra were often measured preoperatively, yet the outcomes were inconsistent. During surgery, the emphasis was primarily on burst suppression (BS) metrics and power spectra, with a link between the frequency and timing of BS, and POD. The EEG patterns observed in POD aligned with those noted in delirium in different contexts, suggesting a reduction in EEG activity. Further research is required to investigate preoperative EEG indicators that may predict susceptibility to delirium.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"1127-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Postoperative delirium (POD) is frequent in older adults and is associated with adverse cognitive and functional outcomes. In the last several decades, there has been an increased interest in exploring tools that easily allow the early recognition of patients at risk of developing POD. The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a widely available tool used to understand delirium pathophysiology, and its use in the perioperative setting has grown exponentially, particularly to predict and detect POD. We performed a systematic review to investigate the use of EEG in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative settings. We identified 371 studies, and 56 met the inclusion criteria. A range of techniques was used to obtain EEG data, from limited 1-4 channel setups to complex 256-channel systems. Power spectra were often measured preoperatively, yet the outcomes were inconsistent. During surgery, the emphasis was primarily on burst suppression (BS) metrics and power spectra, with a link between the frequency and timing of BS, and POD. The EEG patterns observed in POD aligned with those noted in delirium in different contexts, suggesting a reduction in EEG activity. Further research is required to investigate preoperative EEG indicators that may predict susceptibility to delirium.
术后谵妄(POD)在老年人中很常见,并与认知和功能方面的不良后果有关。在过去的几十年里,人们越来越有兴趣探索能轻松早期识别有 POD 风险的患者的工具。脑电图(EEG)是一种广泛应用于了解谵妄病理生理学的工具,其在围手术期环境中的应用呈指数级增长,尤其是在预测和检测 POD 方面。我们对术前、术中和术后使用脑电图的情况进行了系统回顾。我们确定了 371 项研究,其中 56 项符合纳入标准。从有限的 1-4 通道设置到复杂的 256 通道系统,我们使用了一系列技术来获取脑电图数据。术前通常会测量功率谱,但结果并不一致。在手术过程中,重点主要放在突发性抑制(BS)指标和功率谱上,BS 的频率和时间与 POD 之间存在联系。在 POD 中观察到的脑电图模式与谵妄患者在不同情况下观察到的脑电图模式一致,表明脑电图活动减少。需要进一步研究可预测谵妄易感性的术前脑电图指标。
期刊介绍:
Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.