On the optimal design of a new class of proportional portfolio insurance strategies in a jump-diffusion framework

Katia Colaneri, Daniele Mancinelli, Immacolata Oliva
{"title":"On the optimal design of a new class of proportional portfolio insurance strategies in a jump-diffusion framework","authors":"Katia Colaneri, Daniele Mancinelli, Immacolata Oliva","doi":"arxiv-2407.21148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate an optimal investment problem associated with\nproportional portfolio insurance (PPI) strategies in the presence of jumps in\nthe underlying dynamics. PPI strategies enable investors to mitigate downside\nrisk while still retaining the potential for upside gains. This is achieved by\nmaintaining an exposure to risky assets proportional to the difference between\nthe portfolio value and the present value of the guaranteed amount. While PPI\nstrategies are known to be free of downside risk in diffusion modeling\nframeworks with continuous trading, see e.g., Cont and Tankov (2009), real\nmarket applications exhibit a significant non-negligible risk, known as gap\nrisk, which increases with the multiplier value. The goal of this paper is to\ndetermine the optimal PPI strategy in a setting where gap risk may occur, due\nto downward jumps in the asset price dynamics. We consider a loss-averse agent\nwho aims at maximizing the expected utility of the terminal wealth exceeding a\nminimum guarantee. Technically, we model agent's preferences with an S-shaped\nutility functions to accommodate the possibility that gap risk occurs, and\naddress the optimization problem via a generalization of the martingale\napproach that turns to be valid under market incompleteness in a jump-diffusion\nframework.","PeriodicalId":501128,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate an optimal investment problem associated with proportional portfolio insurance (PPI) strategies in the presence of jumps in the underlying dynamics. PPI strategies enable investors to mitigate downside risk while still retaining the potential for upside gains. This is achieved by maintaining an exposure to risky assets proportional to the difference between the portfolio value and the present value of the guaranteed amount. While PPI strategies are known to be free of downside risk in diffusion modeling frameworks with continuous trading, see e.g., Cont and Tankov (2009), real market applications exhibit a significant non-negligible risk, known as gap risk, which increases with the multiplier value. The goal of this paper is to determine the optimal PPI strategy in a setting where gap risk may occur, due to downward jumps in the asset price dynamics. We consider a loss-averse agent who aims at maximizing the expected utility of the terminal wealth exceeding a minimum guarantee. Technically, we model agent's preferences with an S-shaped utility functions to accommodate the possibility that gap risk occurs, and address the optimization problem via a generalization of the martingale approach that turns to be valid under market incompleteness in a jump-diffusion framework.
论跳跃扩散框架下新一类比例组合保险策略的优化设计
在本文中,我们研究了在基本动态存在跳跃的情况下,与比例投资组合保险(PPI)策略相关的最优投资问题。PPI 策略使投资者能够减轻下跌风险,同时仍保留上涨收益的潜力。这是通过保持与投资组合价值和保证金额现值之间的差额成比例的风险资产敞口来实现的。在连续交易的扩散建模框架中,众所周知 PPI 策略不存在下行风险,参见 Cont 和 Tankov(2009 年)等,但在实际市场应用中,会出现不可忽略的重大风险,即缺口风险,这种风险会随着乘数值的增加而增加。本文的目标是在缺口风险可能发生、资产价格动态向下跳跃的情况下,确定最优的 PPI 策略。我们考虑了一个规避损失的代理人,他的目标是最大化超过最低保证的最终财富的预期效用。在技术上,我们用 S 型效用函数来模拟代理人的偏好,以适应缺口风险发生的可能性,并通过马氏方法的广义化来解决优化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信