{"title":"Robust Restaking Networks","authors":"Naveen Durvasula, Tim Roughgarden","doi":"arxiv-2407.21785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking\nprotocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a\nfunction of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example,\nour results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\\%,\nthen a sudden loss of .1\\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error)\ncannot result in the ultimate loss of more than 1.1\\% of the overall stake. We\nalso provide local analogs of these overcollateralization conditions and robust\nsecurity guarantees that apply specifically for a target service or coalition\nof services. All of our bounds on worst-case stake loss are the best possible.\nFinally, we bound the maximum-possible length of a cascade of attacks. Our results suggest measures of robustness that could be exposed to the\nparticipants in a restaking protocol. We also suggest polynomial-time\ncomputable sufficient conditions that can proxy for these measures.","PeriodicalId":501525,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Data Structures and Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking
protocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a
function of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example,
our results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\%,
then a sudden loss of .1\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error)
cannot result in the ultimate loss of more than 1.1\% of the overall stake. We
also provide local analogs of these overcollateralization conditions and robust
security guarantees that apply specifically for a target service or coalition
of services. All of our bounds on worst-case stake loss are the best possible.
Finally, we bound the maximum-possible length of a cascade of attacks. Our results suggest measures of robustness that could be exposed to the
participants in a restaking protocol. We also suggest polynomial-time
computable sufficient conditions that can proxy for these measures.