{"title":"Pandemic, policy, and markets: insights and learning from COVID-19’s impact on global stock behavior","authors":"Shuxin Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00181-024-02648-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an unprecedented shock to global stock markets, exceeding the economic impacts of prior pandemics. This paper examines the pandemic’s impact on global stock markets across 34 countries, focusing on the relationship between the pandemic’s severity, government policy responses, and economic stimuli. Panel data regressions reveal that increased daily COVID-19 cases initially negatively impacted stock returns and increased volatility. Stringent government measures positively influenced market returns but also heightened volatility. The research challenges previous assumptions about the influence of geographical and economic factors on market reactions. By segregating the sample period by investor sentiment, the study finds a consistent pattern of negative lagged returns, indicating stronger mean reversion during high VIX periods. During low market volatility, government stringency measures are perceived as harmful to economic activity, negatively impacting stock returns. The insights from the COVID-19 pandemic can inform responses to future market disruptions from health crises, geopolitical tensions, environmental disasters, or other systemic shocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11642,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Economics","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02648-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an unprecedented shock to global stock markets, exceeding the economic impacts of prior pandemics. This paper examines the pandemic’s impact on global stock markets across 34 countries, focusing on the relationship between the pandemic’s severity, government policy responses, and economic stimuli. Panel data regressions reveal that increased daily COVID-19 cases initially negatively impacted stock returns and increased volatility. Stringent government measures positively influenced market returns but also heightened volatility. The research challenges previous assumptions about the influence of geographical and economic factors on market reactions. By segregating the sample period by investor sentiment, the study finds a consistent pattern of negative lagged returns, indicating stronger mean reversion during high VIX periods. During low market volatility, government stringency measures are perceived as harmful to economic activity, negatively impacting stock returns. The insights from the COVID-19 pandemic can inform responses to future market disruptions from health crises, geopolitical tensions, environmental disasters, or other systemic shocks.
期刊介绍:
Empirical Economics publishes high quality papers using econometric or statistical methods to fill the gap between economic theory and observed data. Papers explore such topics as estimation of established relationships between economic variables, testing of hypotheses derived from economic theory, treatment effect estimation, policy evaluation, simulation, forecasting, as well as econometric methods and measurement. Empirical Economics emphasizes the replicability of empirical results. Replication studies of important results in the literature - both positive and negative results - may be published as short papers in Empirical Economics. Authors of all accepted papers and replications are required to submit all data and codes prior to publication (for more details, see: Instructions for Authors).The journal follows a single blind review procedure. In order to ensure the high quality of the journal and an efficient editorial process, a substantial number of submissions that have very poor chances of receiving positive reviews are routinely rejected without sending the papers for review.Officially cited as: Empir Econ