Community-led vertebrate pest management in urban areas: barriers and motivations

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Rosie V. Gerolemou, James C. Russell, Margaret C. Stanley
{"title":"Community-led vertebrate pest management in urban areas: barriers and motivations","authors":"Rosie V. Gerolemou, James C. Russell, Margaret C. Stanley","doi":"10.5751/es-15141-290311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Residential green spaces in cities can make a significant contribution to urban conservation. To engage urban residents in conservation, we need to understand what influences participation. We interviewed leaders of community conservation groups and surveyed members of the public in Auckland, New Zealand using an anonymous questionnaire. We investigated whether environmental attitudes differ between those who do and do not participate in conservation actions (volunteering in a community conservation group and/or controlling pest mammals), and the motivations and barriers to participating in conservation actions. We found that conservation leaders often founded their conservation groups with a biodiversity motivation, whereas many of their group members subsequently joined and continued to participate for social reasons. Conservation group members were more likely to be in favor of pest control and had more positive environmental attitudes than non-participants. They found group work more motivating and productive than working alone. For people already participating in conservation (controlling pests, leading a group, or volunteering), the most common barrier to increasing participation was opportunity, most notably a lack of time. We found that people tended to control pest mammals for self-interested reasons, such as preventing damage to their homes (67%; n = 358), whilst biodiversity motivations (protecting native species) were secondary (53%; n = 283). For people not participating in pest control, the primary barrier was a lack of interest in participating (26%; n = 109). Although people were supportive of conservation, biodiversity motivations alone are unlikely to be a sufficient motivator for participation. Given the range of different motivations and barriers, targeted messaging (e.g., promoting social connections) could increase participation in urban conservation.</p>\n<p>The post Community-led vertebrate pest management in urban areas: barriers and motivations first appeared on Ecology & Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51028,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/es-15141-290311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential green spaces in cities can make a significant contribution to urban conservation. To engage urban residents in conservation, we need to understand what influences participation. We interviewed leaders of community conservation groups and surveyed members of the public in Auckland, New Zealand using an anonymous questionnaire. We investigated whether environmental attitudes differ between those who do and do not participate in conservation actions (volunteering in a community conservation group and/or controlling pest mammals), and the motivations and barriers to participating in conservation actions. We found that conservation leaders often founded their conservation groups with a biodiversity motivation, whereas many of their group members subsequently joined and continued to participate for social reasons. Conservation group members were more likely to be in favor of pest control and had more positive environmental attitudes than non-participants. They found group work more motivating and productive than working alone. For people already participating in conservation (controlling pests, leading a group, or volunteering), the most common barrier to increasing participation was opportunity, most notably a lack of time. We found that people tended to control pest mammals for self-interested reasons, such as preventing damage to their homes (67%; n = 358), whilst biodiversity motivations (protecting native species) were secondary (53%; n = 283). For people not participating in pest control, the primary barrier was a lack of interest in participating (26%; n = 109). Although people were supportive of conservation, biodiversity motivations alone are unlikely to be a sufficient motivator for participation. Given the range of different motivations and barriers, targeted messaging (e.g., promoting social connections) could increase participation in urban conservation.

The post Community-led vertebrate pest management in urban areas: barriers and motivations first appeared on Ecology & Society.

城市地区以社区为主导的脊椎动物害虫管理:障碍与动机
城市中的住宅绿地可以为城市保护做出重大贡献。为了让城市居民参与保护,我们需要了解是什么影响了居民的参与。在新西兰奥克兰,我们采访了社区保护团体的领导者,并使用匿名问卷对公众进行了调查。我们调查了参与和不参与保护行动(志愿参加社区保护团体和/或控制有害哺乳动物)的人对环境的态度是否不同,以及参与保护行动的动机和障碍。我们发现,保护团体的领导者通常是出于生物多样性的动机成立保护团体的,而他们的许多团体成员则是出于社会原因加入并继续参与保护团体的。与非参与者相比,保护小组成员更倾向于支持害虫控制,对环境的态度也更积极。他们认为小组工作比单独工作更有动力、更有成效。对于已经参与保护(控制害虫、领导小组或志愿服务)的人来说,增加参与的最常见障碍是机会,最明显的是缺乏时间。我们发现,人们控制有害哺乳动物往往是出于自身利益的考虑,例如防止对其家园造成损害(67%;n = 358),而生物多样性动机(保护本地物种)则是次要的(53%;n = 283)。对于不参与害虫防治的人来说,主要障碍是缺乏参与兴趣(26%;n = 109)。尽管人们支持保护,但生物多样性动机本身不太可能成为参与的充分动力。鉴于存在各种不同的动机和障碍,有针对性的信息传播(如促进社会联系)可提高城市保护的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology and Society
Ecology and Society 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology and Society is an electronic, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of current research. Manuscript submission, peer review, and publication are all handled on the Internet. Software developed for the journal automates all clerical steps during peer review, facilitates a double-blind peer review process, and allows authors and editors to follow the progress of peer review on the Internet. As articles are accepted, they are published in an "Issue in Progress." At four month intervals the Issue-in-Progress is declared a New Issue, and subscribers receive the Table of Contents of the issue via email. Our turn-around time (submission to publication) averages around 350 days. We encourage publication of special features. Special features are comprised of a set of manuscripts that address a single theme, and include an introductory and summary manuscript. The individual contributions are published in regular issues, and the special feature manuscripts are linked through a table of contents and announced on the journal''s main page. The journal seeks papers that are novel, integrative and written in a way that is accessible to a wide audience that includes an array of disciplines from the natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities concerned with the relationship between society and the life-supporting ecosystems on which human wellbeing ultimately depends.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信