Financial Analysis on Social Media and Disclosure Processing Costs: Evidence from Seeking Alpha

Enrique A. Gomez, Frank Heflin, James R. Moon, James D. Warren
{"title":"Financial Analysis on Social Media and Disclosure Processing Costs: Evidence from Seeking Alpha","authors":"Enrique A. Gomez, Frank Heflin, James R. Moon, James D. Warren","doi":"10.2308/tar-2018-0659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> Less-informed investors face greater costs of processing earnings news into actionable information. Our findings suggest financial analysis on social media reduces less-informed investors’ disclosure processing costs. We document an attenuated spike in earnings announcement (EA) information asymmetry for quarters containing more financial analysis on social media in the weeks prior to the EA. Cross-sectional evidence suggests this finding is stronger when coverage from traditional intermediaries is lower, for financial analyses written by more credible authors, and for financial analyses that are more likely relevant to evaluating the EA. Further evidence suggests retail trades, but not institutional trades, at EAs are significantly more profitable in quarters with greater financial analysis on social media, consistent with financial analysis on social media benefitting traders who are otherwise less-informed. Overall, our evidence suggests that financial analysis on social media plays an important role in aiding less-informed investors by helping them better process EA news. JEL Classifications: G14; M41.","PeriodicalId":22240,"journal":{"name":"The Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2018-0659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Less-informed investors face greater costs of processing earnings news into actionable information. Our findings suggest financial analysis on social media reduces less-informed investors’ disclosure processing costs. We document an attenuated spike in earnings announcement (EA) information asymmetry for quarters containing more financial analysis on social media in the weeks prior to the EA. Cross-sectional evidence suggests this finding is stronger when coverage from traditional intermediaries is lower, for financial analyses written by more credible authors, and for financial analyses that are more likely relevant to evaluating the EA. Further evidence suggests retail trades, but not institutional trades, at EAs are significantly more profitable in quarters with greater financial analysis on social media, consistent with financial analysis on social media benefitting traders who are otherwise less-informed. Overall, our evidence suggests that financial analysis on social media plays an important role in aiding less-informed investors by helping them better process EA news. JEL Classifications: G14; M41.
社交媒体和信息披露处理成本的财务分析:来自 Seeking Alpha 的证据
摘要 消息不灵通的投资者将盈利新闻转化为可操作信息的成本更高。我们的研究结果表明,社交媒体上的财务分析降低了信息较少投资者的信息披露处理成本。我们发现,在发布盈利公告(EA)的前几周,社交媒体上包含更多财务分析的季度,其盈利公告(EA)信息不对称的峰值有所减弱。横截面证据表明,当来自传统中介机构的报道较少、财务分析由更可信的作者撰写以及财务分析更有可能与评估 EA 相关时,这一发现会更强烈。进一步的证据表明,在社交媒体上有更多金融分析的季度,EA 的零售交易(而非机构交易)的盈利能力明显更高,这与社交媒体上的金融分析使原本信息较少的交易者受益是一致的。总之,我们的证据表明,社交媒体上的金融分析在帮助信息较少的投资者方面发挥了重要作用,帮助他们更好地处理 EA 新闻。JEL 分类:G14; M41.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信