Employees’ attitudinal reactions to supervisors’ weekly taking charge behavior: the moderating role of employees’ proactive personality

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Felipe A. Guzman, Melvyn R.W. Hamstra, Pablo Ignacio Escribano, Xin Fu
{"title":"Employees’ attitudinal reactions to supervisors’ weekly taking charge behavior: the moderating role of employees’ proactive personality","authors":"Felipe A. Guzman, Melvyn R.W. Hamstra, Pablo Ignacio Escribano, Xin Fu","doi":"10.1108/jmp-11-2023-0678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Researchers have studied supervisors’ proactive personality in its relationship with employees’ attitudes. However, little attention has been given to how employees react to instances of supervisors’ proactive behavior. Drawing from P-E fit theory, we propose that the relationship between supervisor weekly taking charge behavior (TCB, the quintessential proactive behavior) and employees’ weekly job attitudes depends on employees’ proactive personality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Utilizing a diary study, we investigate how employees’ proactive personality moderates the within-person relationship between supervisor TCB and employees’ attitudes (measured as job satisfaction and affective commitment). We surveyed 39 employees ten times over ten weeks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Multi-level analyses partially supported our predictions on the differential effects of weekly supervisor TCB on employees’ job attitudes. Supervisors’ above-average TCB was significantly related to higher levels of employees’ job satisfaction and marginally related to affective commitment for employees with high proactive personality, but not for those with low proactive personality. Supplemental analyses revealed that our results are unique to supervisor TCB and not to supervisor helping behavior.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Our study is among the first to utilize a dynamic approach to understand the consequences of supervisors’ proactive work behavior in the context of P-E fit research. Our findings will open several fruitful avenues for future research that continue to understand the powerful effects of supervisors’ proactivity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-11-2023-0678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Researchers have studied supervisors’ proactive personality in its relationship with employees’ attitudes. However, little attention has been given to how employees react to instances of supervisors’ proactive behavior. Drawing from P-E fit theory, we propose that the relationship between supervisor weekly taking charge behavior (TCB, the quintessential proactive behavior) and employees’ weekly job attitudes depends on employees’ proactive personality.

Design/methodology/approach

Utilizing a diary study, we investigate how employees’ proactive personality moderates the within-person relationship between supervisor TCB and employees’ attitudes (measured as job satisfaction and affective commitment). We surveyed 39 employees ten times over ten weeks.

Findings

Multi-level analyses partially supported our predictions on the differential effects of weekly supervisor TCB on employees’ job attitudes. Supervisors’ above-average TCB was significantly related to higher levels of employees’ job satisfaction and marginally related to affective commitment for employees with high proactive personality, but not for those with low proactive personality. Supplemental analyses revealed that our results are unique to supervisor TCB and not to supervisor helping behavior.

Originality/value

Our study is among the first to utilize a dynamic approach to understand the consequences of supervisors’ proactive work behavior in the context of P-E fit research. Our findings will open several fruitful avenues for future research that continue to understand the powerful effects of supervisors’ proactivity.

员工对主管每周负责行为的态度反应:员工积极主动性格的调节作用
研究目的:研究人员对主管的积极主动性格与员工态度之间的关系进行了研究。然而,人们很少关注员工对主管积极主动行为的反应。根据 P-E 适应理论,我们提出,主管每周负责行为(TCB,典型的积极主动行为)与员工每周工作态度之间的关系取决于员工的积极主动个性。设计/方法/途径通过一项日记研究,我们探讨了员工的积极主动个性如何调节主管 TCB 与员工态度(以工作满意度和情感承诺为衡量标准)之间的人际关系。我们在十周内对 39 名员工进行了十次调查。研究结果多层次分析部分支持了我们关于每周主管 TCB 对员工工作态度的不同影响的预测。对于高积极主动型人格的员工来说,主管高于平均水平的 TCB 与较高水平的员工工作满意度明显相关,与情感承诺略有相关,但对于低积极主动型人格的员工来说则没有相关性。补充分析表明,我们的研究结果是主管 TCB 的独特结果,而不是主管帮助行为的独特结果。我们的研究结果将为今后的研究开辟几条富有成效的途径,以继续了解主管积极主动的强大作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: ■Communication and its influence on action ■Developments in leadership styles ■How managers achieve success ■How work design affects job motivation ■Influences on managerial priorities and time allocation ■Managing conflicts ■The decision-making process in Eastern and Western business cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信