An improved moth flame optimization for optimal DG and battery energy storage allocation in distribution systems

Mohamed A. Elseify, Salah Kamel, Loai Nasrat
{"title":"An improved moth flame optimization for optimal DG and battery energy storage allocation in distribution systems","authors":"Mohamed A. Elseify, Salah Kamel, Loai Nasrat","doi":"10.1007/s10586-024-04668-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deploying distributed generators (DGs) powered by renewable energy poses a significant challenge for effective power system operation. Optimally scheduling DGs, especially photovoltaic (PV) systems and wind turbines (WTs), is critical because of the unpredictable nature of wind speed and solar radiation. These intermittencies have posed considerable challenges to power grids, including power oscillation, increased losses, and voltage instability. To overcome these challenges, the battery energy storage (BES) system supports the PV unit, while the biomass aids the WT unit, mitigating power fluctuations and boosting supply continuity. Therefore, the main innovation of this study is presenting an improved moth flame optimization algorithm (IMFO) to capture the optimal scheduling of multiple dispatchable and non-dispatchable DGs for mitigating energy loss in power grids, considering different dynamic load characteristics. The IMFO algorithm comprises a new update position expression based on a roulette wheel selection strategy as well as Gaussian barebones (GB) and quasi-opposite-based learning (QOBL) mechanisms to enhance exploitation capability, global convergence rate, and solution precision. The IMFO algorithm's success rate and effectiveness are evaluated using 23rd benchmark functions and compared with the basic MFO algorithm and other seven competitors using rigorous statistical analysis. The developed optimizer is then adopted to study the performance of the 69-bus and 118-bus distribution grids, considering deterministic and stochastic DG's optimal planning. The findings reflect the superiority of the developed algorithm against its rivals, emphasizing the influence of load types and varying generations in DG planning. Numerically, the optimal deployment of BES + PV and biomass + WT significantly maximizes the energy loss reduction percent to 68.3471 and 98.0449 for the 69-bus's commercial load type and to 54.833 and 52.0623 for the 118-bus's commercial load type, respectively, confirming the efficacy of the developed algorithm for maximizing the performance of distribution systems in diverse situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":501576,"journal":{"name":"Cluster Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cluster Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04668-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deploying distributed generators (DGs) powered by renewable energy poses a significant challenge for effective power system operation. Optimally scheduling DGs, especially photovoltaic (PV) systems and wind turbines (WTs), is critical because of the unpredictable nature of wind speed and solar radiation. These intermittencies have posed considerable challenges to power grids, including power oscillation, increased losses, and voltage instability. To overcome these challenges, the battery energy storage (BES) system supports the PV unit, while the biomass aids the WT unit, mitigating power fluctuations and boosting supply continuity. Therefore, the main innovation of this study is presenting an improved moth flame optimization algorithm (IMFO) to capture the optimal scheduling of multiple dispatchable and non-dispatchable DGs for mitigating energy loss in power grids, considering different dynamic load characteristics. The IMFO algorithm comprises a new update position expression based on a roulette wheel selection strategy as well as Gaussian barebones (GB) and quasi-opposite-based learning (QOBL) mechanisms to enhance exploitation capability, global convergence rate, and solution precision. The IMFO algorithm's success rate and effectiveness are evaluated using 23rd benchmark functions and compared with the basic MFO algorithm and other seven competitors using rigorous statistical analysis. The developed optimizer is then adopted to study the performance of the 69-bus and 118-bus distribution grids, considering deterministic and stochastic DG's optimal planning. The findings reflect the superiority of the developed algorithm against its rivals, emphasizing the influence of load types and varying generations in DG planning. Numerically, the optimal deployment of BES + PV and biomass + WT significantly maximizes the energy loss reduction percent to 68.3471 and 98.0449 for the 69-bus's commercial load type and to 54.833 and 52.0623 for the 118-bus's commercial load type, respectively, confirming the efficacy of the developed algorithm for maximizing the performance of distribution systems in diverse situations.

Abstract Image

配电系统中优化 DG 和电池储能分配的改进型蛾焰优化法
部署由可再生能源供电的分布式发电机(DGs)对电力系统的有效运行提出了巨大挑战。由于风速和太阳辐射的不可预测性,对分布式发电机(尤其是光伏系统和风力涡轮机)进行优化调度至关重要。这些间歇性现象给电网带来了相当大的挑战,包括功率振荡、损耗增加和电压不稳。为了克服这些挑战,电池储能(BES)系统为光伏装置提供支持,而生物质能则为风能装置提供帮助,从而缓解电力波动并提高供电连续性。因此,本研究的主要创新点在于提出了一种改进的蛾焰优化算法(IMFO),用于捕捉多个可调度和不可调度 DG 的优化调度,以减少电网中的能量损失,同时考虑到不同的动态负载特征。IMFO 算法包括一种基于轮盘选择策略的新的更新位置表达式,以及高斯裸机(GB)和准对立学习(QOBL)机制,以增强开发能力、全局收敛速度和解决方案精度。利用 23 个基准函数评估了 IMFO 算法的成功率和有效性,并通过严格的统计分析将其与基本 MFO 算法和其他七个竞争者进行了比较。然后,采用所开发的优化器研究了 69 总线和 118 总线配电网的性能,并考虑了确定性和随机性 DG 的优化规划。研究结果反映了所开发算法与竞争对手相比的优越性,强调了负荷类型和不同世代对 DG 规划的影响。从数值上看,BES + PV 和生物质 + WT 的优化部署大大提高了能源损耗降低率,69 路公交车的商业负载类型分别为 68.3471 和 98.0449,118 路公交车的商业负载类型分别为 54.833 和 52.0623,证实了所开发算法在不同情况下最大化配电系统性能的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信