Probabilistic dynamic resilience quantification for infrastructure systems in multi-hazard environments

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ahmed Badr , Zoe Li , Wael El-Dakhakhni
{"title":"Probabilistic dynamic resilience quantification for infrastructure systems in multi-hazard environments","authors":"Ahmed Badr ,&nbsp;Zoe Li ,&nbsp;Wael El-Dakhakhni","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resilience has been evolving as a key criterion for infrastructure systems as it ensures the system's dynamic performance pre-, during, and post-hazard disruptions. However, estimating these performances is challenging due to system and operation complexities, and the probabilistic dynamic nature of infrastructure system. Moreover, infrastructure systems are usually exposed to multi-hazard environments, with their own probabilistic behavior, leading to additional complexity in terms of estimating the system response and, subsequently, the overall system resilience. As such, this study develops a probabilistic resilience-centric system dynamics modeling approach to quantify infrastructure dynamic resilience based on a holistic representation of infrastructure systems under multi-hazard scenarios, whereby the probabilistic natures of both the hazards and system are incorporated. Unlike the traditional resilience quantification approaches that represent system resilience by a single value calculated after the system's full recovery, the developed model focuses on tracking the temporal evolution of system resilience along the entire period of system performance deterioration and recovery. A real-world hydropower dam, as an example for infrastructure systems, in British Columbia, Canada is used as a demonstration application to show model utility in developing resilience-guided assessment plans for infrastructure systems. Overall, the developed approach empowers the decision-makers with insights into critical operational periods, the required time to reach specified resilience targets, and the efficiency of risk mitigation measures in <em>real-time</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100698"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000398/pdfft?md5=cf0b554879a85aad377f598558d3e1ea&pid=1-s2.0-S1874548224000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilience has been evolving as a key criterion for infrastructure systems as it ensures the system's dynamic performance pre-, during, and post-hazard disruptions. However, estimating these performances is challenging due to system and operation complexities, and the probabilistic dynamic nature of infrastructure system. Moreover, infrastructure systems are usually exposed to multi-hazard environments, with their own probabilistic behavior, leading to additional complexity in terms of estimating the system response and, subsequently, the overall system resilience. As such, this study develops a probabilistic resilience-centric system dynamics modeling approach to quantify infrastructure dynamic resilience based on a holistic representation of infrastructure systems under multi-hazard scenarios, whereby the probabilistic natures of both the hazards and system are incorporated. Unlike the traditional resilience quantification approaches that represent system resilience by a single value calculated after the system's full recovery, the developed model focuses on tracking the temporal evolution of system resilience along the entire period of system performance deterioration and recovery. A real-world hydropower dam, as an example for infrastructure systems, in British Columbia, Canada is used as a demonstration application to show model utility in developing resilience-guided assessment plans for infrastructure systems. Overall, the developed approach empowers the decision-makers with insights into critical operational periods, the required time to reach specified resilience targets, and the efficiency of risk mitigation measures in real-time.

多灾害环境下基础设施系统的概率动态复原力量化
抗灾能力已逐渐成为基础设施系统的一个关键标准,因为它能确保系统在灾害中断之前、期间和之后的动态性能。然而,由于系统和运行的复杂性,以及基础设施系统的概率动态特性,对这些性能进行估算具有挑战性。此外,基础设施系统通常会暴露在多种灾害环境中,其本身也具有概率行为,这就增加了估算系统响应的复杂性,进而增加了整体系统复原力的复杂性。因此,本研究开发了一种以抗灾能力为中心的概率系统动力学建模方法,以量化基础设施的动态抗灾能力,该方法基于基础设施系统在多灾害情景下的整体表示,其中纳入了灾害和系统的概率性质。传统的复原力量化方法以系统完全恢复后计算出的单一数值来表示系统复原力,与之不同的是,所开发的模型侧重于跟踪系统复原力在整个系统性能恶化和恢复期间的时间演变。以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一座实际水电站大坝为例,展示了模型在制定基础设施系统恢复力指导评估计划中的实用性。总之,所开发的方法使决策者能够深入了解关键运行期、达到指定恢复能力目标所需的时间以及......风险缓解措施的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (IJCIP) was launched in 2008, with the primary aim of publishing scholarly papers of the highest quality in all areas of critical infrastructure protection. Of particular interest are articles that weave science, technology, law and policy to craft sophisticated yet practical solutions for securing assets in the various critical infrastructure sectors. These critical infrastructure sectors include: information technology, telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, transportation systems, chemicals, critical manufacturing, agriculture and food, defense industrial base, public health and health care, national monuments and icons, drinking water and water treatment systems, commercial facilities, dams, emergency services, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, postal and shipping, and government facilities. Protecting and ensuring the continuity of operation of critical infrastructure assets are vital to national security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and societal wellbeing. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: 1. Analysis of security challenges that are unique or common to the various infrastructure sectors. 2. Identification of core security principles and techniques that can be applied to critical infrastructure protection. 3. Elucidation of the dependencies and interdependencies existing between infrastructure sectors and techniques for mitigating the devastating effects of cascading failures. 4. Creation of sophisticated, yet practical, solutions, for critical infrastructure protection that involve mathematical, scientific and engineering techniques, economic and social science methods, and/or legal and public policy constructs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信