Influence of Native Woody Understory on Invasive Grasses and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics Under Plantation and Remnant Montane Tropical Trees

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Carla M. D’Antonio, Evan Rehm, Cheryl Elgersma, Stephanie G. Yelenik
{"title":"Influence of Native Woody Understory on Invasive Grasses and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics Under Plantation and Remnant Montane Tropical Trees","authors":"Carla M. D’Antonio, Evan Rehm, Cheryl Elgersma, Stephanie G. Yelenik","doi":"10.1007/s10021-024-00922-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While the influence of canopy trees on soils in natural and restored forest environments is well studied, the influence of understory species is not. Here, we evaluate the effects of outplanted native woody understory on invasive grass biomass and soil nutrient properties in heavily grass-invaded 30 + year-old plantations of a native N-fixing tree <i>Acacia koa</i> in Hawai‘i. We analyze soils from under <i>A. koa</i> trees with versus without planted woody understory and compare these to soils from under remnant pasture trees of the pre-deforestation dominant, <i>Metrosideros polymorpha</i> where passive recruitment of native woody understory has occurred since the cessation of grazing. Simultaneously, we experimentally planted understory species at three times the density used by managers to see if this could quickly decrease grass biomass and change soil nutrient dynamics. We found that invasive grass biomass declined with understory planting in surveyed and experimental sites. Yet, woody understory abundance had no effect on N cycling. Short-term N availability and nitrification potential were higher under <i>A. koa</i> than <i>M. polymorpha</i> trees regardless of understory. Net N mineralization either did not differ (~ 1 mo) between canopy species or was higher (171 day incubations) under remnant <i>M. polymorpha</i> where organic matter was also higher. The only influence of understory on soil was a positive correlation with loss-on-ignition (organic matter) under <i>M. polymorpha</i>. We also demonstrate differential controls over <i>N</i> cycling under the two canopy tree species. Overall, understory restoration has not changed soil characteristics even as invasive grass biomass declines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11406,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00922-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the influence of canopy trees on soils in natural and restored forest environments is well studied, the influence of understory species is not. Here, we evaluate the effects of outplanted native woody understory on invasive grass biomass and soil nutrient properties in heavily grass-invaded 30 + year-old plantations of a native N-fixing tree Acacia koa in Hawai‘i. We analyze soils from under A. koa trees with versus without planted woody understory and compare these to soils from under remnant pasture trees of the pre-deforestation dominant, Metrosideros polymorpha where passive recruitment of native woody understory has occurred since the cessation of grazing. Simultaneously, we experimentally planted understory species at three times the density used by managers to see if this could quickly decrease grass biomass and change soil nutrient dynamics. We found that invasive grass biomass declined with understory planting in surveyed and experimental sites. Yet, woody understory abundance had no effect on N cycling. Short-term N availability and nitrification potential were higher under A. koa than M. polymorpha trees regardless of understory. Net N mineralization either did not differ (~ 1 mo) between canopy species or was higher (171 day incubations) under remnant M. polymorpha where organic matter was also higher. The only influence of understory on soil was a positive correlation with loss-on-ignition (organic matter) under M. polymorpha. We also demonstrate differential controls over N cycling under the two canopy tree species. Overall, understory restoration has not changed soil characteristics even as invasive grass biomass declines.

Abstract Image

在种植园和残留的山地热带树木下,原生林下植物对入侵草和土壤氮动态的影响
虽然冠层树木对自然和恢复森林环境中土壤的影响研究得很透彻,但对林下树种的影响研究得还不够。在这里,我们评估了在夏威夷一种固氮树种相思可可(Acacia koa)树龄 30 多年的种植园中,外植原生林下植物对入侵草生物量和土壤养分特性的影响。我们分析了寇阿相思树下的土壤与未种植林下植被的土壤,并将其与植树造林前的优势树种 Metrosideros polymorpha 的残存牧草树下的土壤进行了比较。与此同时,我们试验性地以管理者使用密度的三倍种植林下物种,以了解这样做是否能迅速减少草的生物量并改变土壤养分动态。我们发现,在调查地点和实验地点种植林下物种后,入侵草的生物量有所下降。然而,林下植物的丰度对氮循环没有影响。无论林下植被如何,寇阿树的短期氮供应量和硝化潜力都高于多芒果树。冠层树种之间的净氮矿化度要么没有差异(约 1 个月),要么在有机质也较高的残余 M. polymorpha 树下更高(171 天培养)。林下植物对土壤的唯一影响是与 M. polymorpha 下的点火损失(有机质)呈正相关。我们还证明了两种冠层树种对氮循环的不同控制。总体而言,即使入侵草生物量下降,林下植被恢复也没有改变土壤特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystems
Ecosystems 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The study and management of ecosystems represent the most dynamic field of contemporary ecology. Ecosystem research bridges fundamental ecology and environmental ecology and environmental problem-solving, and spans boundaries of scale, discipline and perspective. Ecosystems features a distinguished team of editors-in-chief and an outstanding international editorial board, and is seen worldwide as a vital home for publishing significant research as well as editorials, mini-reviews and special features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信