LCC-based approach for design and requirement specification for railway track system

IF 1.6 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stephen Famurewa, Elias Kirilmaz, Khosro Soleimani Chamkhorami, Ahmad Kasraei, A. H. S. Garmabaki
{"title":"LCC-based approach for design and requirement specification for railway track system","authors":"Stephen Famurewa, Elias Kirilmaz, Khosro Soleimani Chamkhorami, Ahmad Kasraei, A. H. S. Garmabaki","doi":"10.1007/s13198-024-02399-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis is an important tool for effective infrastructure management. It is an essential decision support methodology for selection, design, development, construction, maintenance and renewal of railway infrastructure system. Effective implementation of LCC analysis will assure cost-effective operation of railways from both investment and life-cycle perspectives. A major setback in the successful implementation of LCC analysis by infrastructure managers is the availability of relevant, reliable, and structured data. Different cost estimation methods and prediction models have been developed to deal with this challenge. However, there is a need to include condition degradation models as an integral part of LCC model to account for possible changes in the model variables. This article presents an approach for integrating degradation models with LCC model to study the impact of change in design speed on key decision criteria such as track possession time, service life of track system, and LCC. The methodology is applied to an ongoing railway investment project in Sweden to investigate and quantify the impact of design speed change from 250 to 320 km/h. The results of the studied degradation models show that the intended change in speed corresponds to correction factor values between 0.79 and 0.96. Using this correction factor to compensate for changes in design speed, the service life of ballasted track system is estimated to decrease by an average of 15%. Further, the expected value of LCC for the route under consideration will increase by 30%. The outcome of this study will be used to support the design and requirement specification of railway track system for the project under consideration. </p>","PeriodicalId":14463,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02399-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis is an important tool for effective infrastructure management. It is an essential decision support methodology for selection, design, development, construction, maintenance and renewal of railway infrastructure system. Effective implementation of LCC analysis will assure cost-effective operation of railways from both investment and life-cycle perspectives. A major setback in the successful implementation of LCC analysis by infrastructure managers is the availability of relevant, reliable, and structured data. Different cost estimation methods and prediction models have been developed to deal with this challenge. However, there is a need to include condition degradation models as an integral part of LCC model to account for possible changes in the model variables. This article presents an approach for integrating degradation models with LCC model to study the impact of change in design speed on key decision criteria such as track possession time, service life of track system, and LCC. The methodology is applied to an ongoing railway investment project in Sweden to investigate and quantify the impact of design speed change from 250 to 320 km/h. The results of the studied degradation models show that the intended change in speed corresponds to correction factor values between 0.79 and 0.96. Using this correction factor to compensate for changes in design speed, the service life of ballasted track system is estimated to decrease by an average of 15%. Further, the expected value of LCC for the route under consideration will increase by 30%. The outcome of this study will be used to support the design and requirement specification of railway track system for the project under consideration. 

Abstract Image

基于 LCC 的铁路轨道系统设计和要求规范方法
寿命周期成本(LCC)分析是有效管理基础设施的重要工具。它是选择、设计、开发、建设、维护和更新铁路基础设施系统的重要决策支持方法。有效实施生命周期成本分析可从投资和生命周期两个角度确保铁路运营的成本效益。基础设施管理者在成功实施 LCC 分析过程中遇到的一个主要障碍是相关、可靠和结构化数据的可用性。为应对这一挑战,人们开发了不同的成本估算方法和预测模型。然而,有必要将状态退化模型作为 LCC 模型的一个组成部分,以考虑模型变量的可能变化。本文介绍了一种将退化模型与 LCC 模型相结合的方法,以研究设计速度变化对轨道占用时间、轨道系统使用寿命和 LCC 等关键决策标准的影响。该方法适用于瑞典正在进行的一个铁路投资项目,以调查和量化设计速度从 250 公里/小时变为 320 公里/小时的影响。所研究的退化模型结果表明,预期的速度变化对应的修正系数值在 0.79 至 0.96 之间。使用该修正系数来补偿设计速度的变化,估计无砟轨道系统的使用寿命将平均缩短 15%。此外,所考虑线路的预期 LCC 值将增加 30%。本研究的结果将用于支持所考虑项目的铁路轨道系统的设计和要求规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: This Journal is established with a view to cater to increased awareness for high quality research in the seamless integration of heterogeneous technologies to formulate bankable solutions to the emergent complex engineering problems. Assurance engineering could be thought of as relating to the provision of higher confidence in the reliable and secure implementation of a system’s critical characteristic features through the espousal of a holistic approach by using a wide variety of cross disciplinary tools and techniques. Successful realization of sustainable and dependable products, systems and services involves an extensive adoption of Reliability, Quality, Safety and Risk related procedures for achieving high assurancelevels of performance; also pivotal are the management issues related to risk and uncertainty that govern the practical constraints encountered in their deployment. It is our intention to provide a platform for the modeling and analysis of large engineering systems, among the other aforementioned allied goals of systems assurance engineering, leading to the enforcement of performance enhancement measures. Achieving a fine balance between theory and practice is the primary focus. The Journal only publishes high quality papers that have passed the rigorous peer review procedure of an archival scientific Journal. The aim is an increasing number of submissions, wide circulation and a high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信