Effects of Coffee arabica cultivation systems on tropical soil microbial biomass and activity in the northeast region of Brazil

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Flavia Ferreira de Carvalho, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Garcia, Raquel Pérez-Maluf, Paulo Henrique Marques Monroe, Fabiano Rodrigues Pereira, Thaís Chaves Almeida, Marcio Renato Nunes
{"title":"Effects of Coffee arabica cultivation systems on tropical soil microbial biomass and activity in the northeast region of Brazil","authors":"Flavia Ferreira de Carvalho,&nbsp;Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Garcia,&nbsp;Raquel Pérez-Maluf,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Marques Monroe,&nbsp;Fabiano Rodrigues Pereira,&nbsp;Thaís Chaves Almeida,&nbsp;Marcio Renato Nunes","doi":"10.1007/s10457-024-01026-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microbial biomass (MB) is an important indicator of soil quality, being responsive to changes resulting from soil management and use. Although there are studies that evaluate changes in soil microbiological attributes in coffee growing systems, the effects of these systems on MB and its relationship with other soil attributes have rarely been investigated, especially in tropical climate conditions at altitude. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of different coffee growing systems on biomass and microbial activity and how these responses relate to other soil and litter attributes. Our study was carried out in soils under three <i>Coffea arabica</i> cultivation systems (CCM—monoculture, CCB—consortium with banana, AFS—agroforestry system with <i>Grevillea robusta</i>) and under native forest (NF). Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–10 cm and subjected to analysis to determine the microbial biomass carbon content (MB-C) by the fumigation-extraction method, accumulated respiration through released CO<sub>2</sub>, soil organic carbon (SOC) and labile carbon by wet oxidation. There was a 45% reduction in SOC in coffee growing systems and a 75% reduction in MB-C in CCM compared to NF. The AFS is closer to native forest conditions due to its positive influence on the SOC content and the efficiency of converting this carbon into microbial carbon. The presence of the forestry component is positive and should be encouraged to mitigate the impacts of coffee growing on the soil.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"98 7","pages":"2397 - 2410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01026-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial biomass (MB) is an important indicator of soil quality, being responsive to changes resulting from soil management and use. Although there are studies that evaluate changes in soil microbiological attributes in coffee growing systems, the effects of these systems on MB and its relationship with other soil attributes have rarely been investigated, especially in tropical climate conditions at altitude. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of different coffee growing systems on biomass and microbial activity and how these responses relate to other soil and litter attributes. Our study was carried out in soils under three Coffea arabica cultivation systems (CCM—monoculture, CCB—consortium with banana, AFS—agroforestry system with Grevillea robusta) and under native forest (NF). Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–10 cm and subjected to analysis to determine the microbial biomass carbon content (MB-C) by the fumigation-extraction method, accumulated respiration through released CO2, soil organic carbon (SOC) and labile carbon by wet oxidation. There was a 45% reduction in SOC in coffee growing systems and a 75% reduction in MB-C in CCM compared to NF. The AFS is closer to native forest conditions due to its positive influence on the SOC content and the efficiency of converting this carbon into microbial carbon. The presence of the forestry component is positive and should be encouraged to mitigate the impacts of coffee growing on the soil.

Abstract Image

阿拉比卡咖啡种植系统对巴西东北部地区热带土壤微生物生物量和活动的影响
微生物生物量(MB)是衡量土壤质量的一个重要指标,它对土壤管理和使用造成的变化反应灵敏。虽然有研究评估了咖啡种植系统中土壤微生物属性的变化,但这些系统对生物量的影响及其与其他土壤属性的关系却很少被研究,尤其是在热带气候条件下的高海拔地区。因此,本研究旨在评估不同咖啡种植系统对生物量和微生物活动的影响,以及这些反应与其他土壤和凋落物属性的关系。我们的研究在三种阿拉比卡咖啡种植系统(CCM-单一种植、CCB-与香蕉的联合种植、AFS-与Grevillea robusta的农林系统)和原生林(NF)下的土壤中进行。土壤样本采集深度为 0-10 厘米,通过熏蒸萃取法分析微生物生物量碳含量 (MB-C)、通过释放的二氧化碳累积的呼吸作用、土壤有机碳 (SOC) 和湿氧化法分析可变碳含量。与 NF 相比,咖啡种植系统中的 SOC 减少了 45%,CCM 中的 MB-C 减少了 75%。由于 AFS 对 SOC 含量的积极影响以及将这些碳转化为微生物碳的效率,AFS 更接近于原生森林条件。林业成分的存在具有积极意义,应予以鼓励,以减轻咖啡种植对土壤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信