Testing for the Asymmetric Optimal Hedge Ratios: With an Application to Bitcoin

Abdulnasser Hatemi-J
{"title":"Testing for the Asymmetric Optimal Hedge Ratios: With an Application to Bitcoin","authors":"Abdulnasser Hatemi-J","doi":"arxiv-2407.19932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing financial risk is of paramount importance to investors, financial\ninstitutions, and corporations. Since the pioneering contribution of Johnson\n(1960), the optimal hedge ratio based on futures is regularly utilized. The\ncurrent paper suggests an explicit and efficient method for testing the null\nhypothesis of a symmetric optimal hedge ratio against an asymmetric alternative\none within a multivariate setting. If the null is rejected, the position\ndependent optimal hedge ratios can be estimated via the suggested model. This\napproach is expected to enhance the accuracy of the implemented hedging\nstrategies compared to the standard methods since it accounts for the fact that\nthe source of risk depends on whether the investor is a buyer or a seller of\nthe risky asset. An application is provided using spot and futures prices of\nBitcoin. The results strongly support the view that the optimal hedge ratio for\nthis cryptocurrency is position dependent. The investor that is long in Bitcoin\nhas a much higher conditional optimal hedge ratio compared to the one that is\nshort in the asset. The difference between the two conditional optimal hedge\nratios is statistically significant, which has important repercussions for\nimplementing risk management strategies.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"200 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing financial risk is of paramount importance to investors, financial institutions, and corporations. Since the pioneering contribution of Johnson (1960), the optimal hedge ratio based on futures is regularly utilized. The current paper suggests an explicit and efficient method for testing the null hypothesis of a symmetric optimal hedge ratio against an asymmetric alternative one within a multivariate setting. If the null is rejected, the position dependent optimal hedge ratios can be estimated via the suggested model. This approach is expected to enhance the accuracy of the implemented hedging strategies compared to the standard methods since it accounts for the fact that the source of risk depends on whether the investor is a buyer or a seller of the risky asset. An application is provided using spot and futures prices of Bitcoin. The results strongly support the view that the optimal hedge ratio for this cryptocurrency is position dependent. The investor that is long in Bitcoin has a much higher conditional optimal hedge ratio compared to the one that is short in the asset. The difference between the two conditional optimal hedge ratios is statistically significant, which has important repercussions for implementing risk management strategies.
测试非对称最佳对冲比率:比特币应用
降低金融风险对于投资者、金融机构和企业来说至关重要。自约翰逊(Johnson,1960 年)做出开创性贡献以来,基于期货的最优对冲比率一直被广泛使用。本文提出了一种明确而有效的方法,用于在多变量环境中检验对称最优对冲比率与非对称替代比率的零假设。如果拒绝了零假设,则可通过建议的模型估算与头寸相关的最优对冲比率。与标准方法相比,这种方法有望提高实施对冲策略的准确性,因为它考虑到了风险来源取决于投资者是风险资产的买方还是卖方这一事实。我们使用比特币的现货和期货价格进行了应用。结果有力地支持了这一观点,即加密货币的最佳对冲比率取决于头寸。与做空比特币的投资者相比,做多比特币的投资者的条件最优对冲比率要高得多。两个条件最优对冲比率之间的差异在统计上是显著的,这对实施风险管理策略具有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信