Verification of weather-radar-based hail metrics with crowdsourced observations from Switzerland

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jérôme Kopp, Alessandro Hering, Urs Germann, Olivia Martius
{"title":"Verification of weather-radar-based hail metrics with crowdsourced observations from Switzerland","authors":"Jérôme Kopp, Alessandro Hering, Urs Germann, Olivia Martius","doi":"10.5194/amt-17-4529-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Remote hail detection and hail size estimation using weather radar observations has the advantage of wide spatial coverage and high spatial and temporal resolution. Switzerland's National Weather Service (MeteoSwiss) uses two radar-based hail metrics: the probability of hail on the ground (POH) to assess the presence of hail and the maximum expected severe hailstone size (MESHS) to estimate the largest hailstone diameter. However, radar-based metrics are not direct measurements of hail and have to be calibrated with and verified against ground-based observations of hail, such as crowdsourced hail reports. Switzerland benefits from a particularly rich and dense dataset of crowdsourced hail reports from the MeteoSwiss app. We combine a new spatiotemporal clustering method (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise, ST-DBSCAN) with radar reflectivity to filter the reports and use the filtered reports to verify POH and MESHS in terms of the hit rate, false-alarm ratio (FAR), critical success index (CSI), and Heidke skill score (HSS). Using a 4 km × 4 km maximum upscaling approach, we find FAR values between 0.3 and 0.7 for POH and FAR > 0.6 for MESHS. For POH, the highest CSI (0.37) and HSS (0.52) are obtained using a 60 % threshold, while for MESHS the highest CSI (0.25) and HSS (0.4) are obtained using a 2 cm threshold. We find that the current calibration of POH does not correspond to a probability and suggest a recalibration based on the filtered reports.","PeriodicalId":8619,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4529-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Remote hail detection and hail size estimation using weather radar observations has the advantage of wide spatial coverage and high spatial and temporal resolution. Switzerland's National Weather Service (MeteoSwiss) uses two radar-based hail metrics: the probability of hail on the ground (POH) to assess the presence of hail and the maximum expected severe hailstone size (MESHS) to estimate the largest hailstone diameter. However, radar-based metrics are not direct measurements of hail and have to be calibrated with and verified against ground-based observations of hail, such as crowdsourced hail reports. Switzerland benefits from a particularly rich and dense dataset of crowdsourced hail reports from the MeteoSwiss app. We combine a new spatiotemporal clustering method (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise, ST-DBSCAN) with radar reflectivity to filter the reports and use the filtered reports to verify POH and MESHS in terms of the hit rate, false-alarm ratio (FAR), critical success index (CSI), and Heidke skill score (HSS). Using a 4 km × 4 km maximum upscaling approach, we find FAR values between 0.3 and 0.7 for POH and FAR > 0.6 for MESHS. For POH, the highest CSI (0.37) and HSS (0.52) are obtained using a 60 % threshold, while for MESHS the highest CSI (0.25) and HSS (0.4) are obtained using a 2 cm threshold. We find that the current calibration of POH does not correspond to a probability and suggest a recalibration based on the filtered reports.
利用来自瑞士的众包观测数据验证基于天气雷达的冰雹指标
摘要利用天气雷达观测数据进行冰雹远程探测和冰雹大小估算具有空间覆盖范围广、时空分辨率高等优点。瑞士国家气象局(MeteoSwiss)使用两个基于雷达的冰雹指标:地面冰雹概率(POH)来评估冰雹的存在,最大预期严重冰雹大小(MESHS)来估计最大冰雹直径。然而,基于雷达的指标并不能直接测量冰雹,必须与地面冰雹观测数据(如众包冰雹报告)进行校准和验证。瑞士从 MeteoSwiss 应用程序中获得了特别丰富和密集的众包冰雹报告数据集。我们将一种新的时空聚类方法(基于密度的噪声应用空间聚类,ST-DBSCAN)与雷达反射率相结合,对报告进行过滤,并使用过滤后的报告从命中率、误报率 (FAR)、关键成功指数 (CSI) 和海德克技能分数 (HSS) 等方面验证 POH 和 MESHS。通过使用 4 km × 4 km 最大升级方法,我们发现 POH 的误报率值介于 0.3 和 0.7 之间,而 MESHS 的误报率大于 0.6。对于 POH,使用 60% 的阈值可获得最高的 CSI(0.37)和 HSS(0.52),而对于 MESHS,使用 2 cm 的阈值可获得最高的 CSI(0.25)和 HSS(0.4)。我们发现,目前的 POH 校准与概率不符,建议根据过滤后的报告重新校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of advances in remote sensing, in-situ and laboratory measurement techniques for the constituents and properties of the Earth’s atmosphere. The main subject areas comprise the development, intercomparison and validation of measurement instruments and techniques of data processing and information retrieval for gases, aerosols, and clouds. The manuscript types considered for peer-reviewed publication are research articles, review articles, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信