European Solidarity Takes the Field: The Dimensional Structure of Political Competition in the European Union After the Polycrisis

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Francesco Visconti, Alessandro Pellegata
{"title":"European Solidarity Takes the Field: The Dimensional Structure of Political Competition in the European Union After the Polycrisis","authors":"Francesco Visconti, Alessandro Pellegata","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies investigating the dimensionality of political space in Europe demonstrate that European Union (EU)‐related issues are orthogonal to the economic left–right dimension. This literature usually employs survey items tapping into general support for the EU. However, the multiple crises that hit Europe after 2008 have polarized even Europhile voters on the more specific issue of European solidarity. This article aims to investigate how voters' attitudes towards European solidarity interplay with their position on the left–right and European integration dimensions, as well as specific economic and cultural issues. Empirical analyses employ original survey data collected in 2019 in 10 EU countries. Results partially support the expectations of regional differences in the dimensionality of the political space, with European solidarity more strongly associated with left–right, EU integration and immigration in Northern EU member states than in Eastern and Southern countries, in which voters are more likely to support solidarity notwithstanding their general political orientations.","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most studies investigating the dimensionality of political space in Europe demonstrate that European Union (EU)‐related issues are orthogonal to the economic left–right dimension. This literature usually employs survey items tapping into general support for the EU. However, the multiple crises that hit Europe after 2008 have polarized even Europhile voters on the more specific issue of European solidarity. This article aims to investigate how voters' attitudes towards European solidarity interplay with their position on the left–right and European integration dimensions, as well as specific economic and cultural issues. Empirical analyses employ original survey data collected in 2019 in 10 EU countries. Results partially support the expectations of regional differences in the dimensionality of the political space, with European solidarity more strongly associated with left–right, EU integration and immigration in Northern EU member states than in Eastern and Southern countries, in which voters are more likely to support solidarity notwithstanding their general political orientations.
欧洲团结上阵:多重危机后欧盟政治竞争的维度结构
大多数调查欧洲政治空间维度的研究表明,欧盟相关问题与经济左右维度是正交的。这些文献通常采用调查项目来了解人们对欧盟的普遍支持。然而,2008 年后欧洲遭遇的多重危机,甚至在欧洲团结这一更为具体的问题上,也使亲欧选民两极分化。本文旨在研究选民对欧洲团结的态度如何与他们在左右派和欧洲一体化方面的立场以及具体的经济和文化问题相互影响。实证分析采用了 2019 年在 10 个欧盟国家收集的原始调查数据。结果部分支持了政治空间维度的地区差异预期,与东部和南部国家相比,欧盟北部成员国的欧洲团结与左右翼、欧盟一体化和移民的关联度更高,而东部和南部国家的选民尽管有一般的政治取向,但更有可能支持团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信