Robin Evrard , Julie Manon , Louis Maistriaux , Lies Fievé , Tom Darius , Olivier Cornu , Benoit Lengelé , Thomas Schubert
{"title":"Enhancing the biological integration of massive bone allografts: A porcine preclinical in vivo pilot-study","authors":"Robin Evrard , Julie Manon , Louis Maistriaux , Lies Fievé , Tom Darius , Olivier Cornu , Benoit Lengelé , Thomas Schubert","doi":"10.1016/j.bone.2024.117213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Critical bone loss can have several origins: infections, tumors or trauma. Therefore, massive bone allograft can be a solution for limb salvage. Such a biological reconstruction should have the ideal biomechanical qualities. However, their complication rate remains too high. Perfusion-decellularization of massive allografts could promote the vitality of these grafts, thereby improving their integration and bone remodeling.</p><p>Three perfusion-decellularized massive bone allografts were compared to 3 fresh frozen massive bone allografts in a preclinical in vivo porcine study using an orthopedic surgery model. Three pigs each underwent a critical diaphyseal femoral defects followed by an allogeneic intercalary femoral graft on their both femurs (one decellularized and one conventional fresh frozen as “native”) to reconstruct the defect. Clinical imaging was performed over 3 months of follow-up. The grafts were then explanted and examined by non-decalcified histology, fluoroscopic microscopy and immunohistochemistry.</p><p>Bone consolidation was achieved in both groups at the same time. However, the volume of bone callus appeared to be greater in the decellularized group. Histology demonstrated a superior bone remodeling in the decellularized group, with a higher number of osteoclasts (<em>p</em> < 0.001) and larger areas of osteoid matrix and newly formed bone as compared to the “native” group. Immunohistochemistry showed a superior vitality and remodeling in both the cortical and medullary cavities for osteocalcin (<em>p</em> < 0.001), Ki67 (p < 0.001), CD3 (p < 0.001) and α-SMA (p < 0.001) as compared the “native” group. Three months after implantation, the decellularized grafts were proven to be biologically more active compared to native grafts. Fluoroscopic microscopy revealed more ossification fronts in the depth of the decellularized grafts (<em>p</em> = 0.021).</p><p>This pilot study provides the first in vivo demonstration on the enhanced biological capacities of massive bone allograft decellularized by perfusion as compared to conventional massive bone allografts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9301,"journal":{"name":"Bone","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 117213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328224002023/pdfft?md5=f4d635469a7fe9be7d69af1e874634c0&pid=1-s2.0-S8756328224002023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328224002023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Critical bone loss can have several origins: infections, tumors or trauma. Therefore, massive bone allograft can be a solution for limb salvage. Such a biological reconstruction should have the ideal biomechanical qualities. However, their complication rate remains too high. Perfusion-decellularization of massive allografts could promote the vitality of these grafts, thereby improving their integration and bone remodeling.
Three perfusion-decellularized massive bone allografts were compared to 3 fresh frozen massive bone allografts in a preclinical in vivo porcine study using an orthopedic surgery model. Three pigs each underwent a critical diaphyseal femoral defects followed by an allogeneic intercalary femoral graft on their both femurs (one decellularized and one conventional fresh frozen as “native”) to reconstruct the defect. Clinical imaging was performed over 3 months of follow-up. The grafts were then explanted and examined by non-decalcified histology, fluoroscopic microscopy and immunohistochemistry.
Bone consolidation was achieved in both groups at the same time. However, the volume of bone callus appeared to be greater in the decellularized group. Histology demonstrated a superior bone remodeling in the decellularized group, with a higher number of osteoclasts (p < 0.001) and larger areas of osteoid matrix and newly formed bone as compared to the “native” group. Immunohistochemistry showed a superior vitality and remodeling in both the cortical and medullary cavities for osteocalcin (p < 0.001), Ki67 (p < 0.001), CD3 (p < 0.001) and α-SMA (p < 0.001) as compared the “native” group. Three months after implantation, the decellularized grafts were proven to be biologically more active compared to native grafts. Fluoroscopic microscopy revealed more ossification fronts in the depth of the decellularized grafts (p = 0.021).
This pilot study provides the first in vivo demonstration on the enhanced biological capacities of massive bone allograft decellularized by perfusion as compared to conventional massive bone allografts.
期刊介绍:
BONE is an interdisciplinary forum for the rapid publication of original articles and reviews on basic, translational, and clinical aspects of bone and mineral metabolism. The Journal also encourages submissions related to interactions of bone with other organ systems, including cartilage, endocrine, muscle, fat, neural, vascular, gastrointestinal, hematopoietic, and immune systems. Particular attention is placed on the application of experimental studies to clinical practice.