There's no place like home: optimizing the antepartum inpatient experience.

Ashley M Hesson, Kavya Davuluri, C Kenzie Corbin, Anna M Rujan, Deborah R Berman
{"title":"There's no place like home: optimizing the antepartum inpatient experience.","authors":"Ashley M Hesson, Kavya Davuluri, C Kenzie Corbin, Anna M Rujan, Deborah R Berman","doi":"10.1186/s40748-024-00185-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To characterize the demographics of a modern hospitalized antepartum population, compare the morbidities of this subset to national morbidity trends, and identify predictors of satisfaction during hospitalization to inform opportunities to enhance equitable antepartum care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant people admitted to the antepartum service of a large university hospital between 2011 and 2019 were surveyed about their hospitalization, pregnancy outcomes, provider interactions, perceived needs, and resource use. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to group patient responses based on latent relationships among demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors of patient experience rating. Patient free text responses were qualitatively analyzed for common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 740 pregnant people invited to participate, 298 surveys met criteria for analysis. 25.2% of these pregnant people identified as non-white and 20.8% were admitted for the management of a chronic medical condition. Patient responses clustered into three representative groups: (1) working pregnant people facing resource limitations, (2) first-time pregnant people with college educations, and (3) pregnant people with medical problems and limited partner support. The mean overall patient admission experience rating was 8.4 ± 1.7 out of 10. Variables represented in Cluster 1 (working and resource limitations) were associated with lower patient experience rating (p < 0.01). There was no significant variation in experience rating with indication for admission (P = 0.14) or outcome of the pregnancy (P = 0.32). Conversely, feeling supported by partners (P < 0.01) and providers (P < 0.01) directly correlated with a better experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Black pregnant people and those with chronic medical conditions are overrepresented in this antepartum population when compared to the demographics of those not requiring hospitalization in pregnancy, where these groups also have higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality at the national level. The most important contributors to patients' satisfaction with their antepartum experience are feeling listened to by providers and supported by partners. Improving patient-provider communication and partner engagement during antepartum admissions should be a focus of inpatient high-risk obstetric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00185-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To characterize the demographics of a modern hospitalized antepartum population, compare the morbidities of this subset to national morbidity trends, and identify predictors of satisfaction during hospitalization to inform opportunities to enhance equitable antepartum care.

Methods: Pregnant people admitted to the antepartum service of a large university hospital between 2011 and 2019 were surveyed about their hospitalization, pregnancy outcomes, provider interactions, perceived needs, and resource use. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to group patient responses based on latent relationships among demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors of patient experience rating. Patient free text responses were qualitatively analyzed for common themes.

Results: Of 740 pregnant people invited to participate, 298 surveys met criteria for analysis. 25.2% of these pregnant people identified as non-white and 20.8% were admitted for the management of a chronic medical condition. Patient responses clustered into three representative groups: (1) working pregnant people facing resource limitations, (2) first-time pregnant people with college educations, and (3) pregnant people with medical problems and limited partner support. The mean overall patient admission experience rating was 8.4 ± 1.7 out of 10. Variables represented in Cluster 1 (working and resource limitations) were associated with lower patient experience rating (p < 0.01). There was no significant variation in experience rating with indication for admission (P = 0.14) or outcome of the pregnancy (P = 0.32). Conversely, feeling supported by partners (P < 0.01) and providers (P < 0.01) directly correlated with a better experience.

Conclusion: Black pregnant people and those with chronic medical conditions are overrepresented in this antepartum population when compared to the demographics of those not requiring hospitalization in pregnancy, where these groups also have higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality at the national level. The most important contributors to patients' satisfaction with their antepartum experience are feeling listened to by providers and supported by partners. Improving patient-provider communication and partner engagement during antepartum admissions should be a focus of inpatient high-risk obstetric care.

没有比家更好的地方:优化产前住院体验。
背景:目的:描述现代住院产前人群的人口统计学特征,将该人群的发病率与全国发病率趋势进行比较,并确定住院期间满意度的预测因素,从而为加强公平产前护理提供信息:方法:对 2011 年至 2019 年期间在一家大型大学医院产前服务部门住院的孕妇进行了调查,内容包括住院情况、妊娠结果、医疗服务提供者之间的互动、感知需求和资源使用情况。根据人口统计学、医学和社会心理变量之间的潜在关系,采用多重对应分析法对患者的回答进行分组。进行了多变量分析,以确定患者体验评分的预测因素。对患者的自由文本回复进行了定性分析,以寻找共同的主题:在受邀参与的 740 名孕妇中,有 298 份调查符合分析标准。其中 25.2% 的孕妇被认定为非白人,20.8% 的孕妇入院治疗慢性病。患者的回答分为三个具有代表性的群体:(1)面临资源限制的在职孕妇;(2)受过大学教育的首次怀孕者;(3)有医疗问题且伴侣支持有限的孕妇。患者入院体验的平均总评分为 8.4 ± 1.7(满分 10 分)。群组 1 中的变量(工作和资源限制)与较低的患者入院体验评分相关(p 结论:患者入院体验评分越低,其入院体验越好:与妊娠期不需要住院治疗的人群相比,黑人孕妇和患有慢性疾病的孕妇在产前人群中的比例过高,而在全国范围内,这些人群的孕产妇发病率和死亡率也较高。患者对其产前检查经历感到满意的最重要因素是感觉到医护人员倾听了他们的意见,并得到了合作伙伴的支持。改善产前住院期间患者与医护人员的沟通和伴侣的参与应成为高危产科住院护理的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信