Scout images acquired prior to cone beam CT acquisitions: reproducibility of findings and added diagnostic information.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
J Christensen, L H Matzen, M Hedegaard, R Spin-Neto
{"title":"Scout images acquired prior to cone beam CT acquisitions: reproducibility of findings and added diagnostic information.","authors":"J Christensen, L H Matzen, M Hedegaard, R Spin-Neto","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to assess the reproducibility of findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scout images. Furthermore, the study aimed to assess whether a scout image shows pathology not seen within the CBCT volume (ie, added diagnostic information) and therefore must be assessed on the same terms as the full volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective design, 233 CBCT reports and scout images were assessed. Kappa statistics and percentage of accordance were used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility as well as agreement between scout and CBCT report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were overall low (kappa ranging from -0.008 to 1.000). Agreement between findings reported in the CBCT and scout was also low. One-hundred-fourteen impacted teeth, one apical periodontitis, and two sinus conditions seen in the scout image were not registered in the full volume report due to the extended size of the scout image.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reproducibility of findings in scout images compared to CBCT volumes was low, and the scout showed very little additional diagnostic information.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study shows that although the reproducibility of viewing scout images is low, rare findings can go undetected if the scout is not assessed. Legislation regarding interpretation of scout images needs to be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess the reproducibility of findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scout images. Furthermore, the study aimed to assess whether a scout image shows pathology not seen within the CBCT volume (ie, added diagnostic information) and therefore must be assessed on the same terms as the full volume.

Methods: Using a retrospective design, 233 CBCT reports and scout images were assessed. Kappa statistics and percentage of accordance were used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility as well as agreement between scout and CBCT report.

Results: Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were overall low (kappa ranging from -0.008 to 1.000). Agreement between findings reported in the CBCT and scout was also low. One-hundred-fourteen impacted teeth, one apical periodontitis, and two sinus conditions seen in the scout image were not registered in the full volume report due to the extended size of the scout image.

Conclusions: Reproducibility of findings in scout images compared to CBCT volumes was low, and the scout showed very little additional diagnostic information.

Advances in knowledge: This study shows that although the reproducibility of viewing scout images is low, rare findings can go undetected if the scout is not assessed. Legislation regarding interpretation of scout images needs to be discussed.

在锥形束 CT 采集前获取的 Scout 图像:结果的再现性和附加诊断信息。
研究目的本研究旨在评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)探查图像结果的可重复性。此外,该研究还旨在评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描图像是否显示了CBCT容积内未见的病理变化(即增加了诊断信息),因此必须以与全容积相同的条件进行评估:方法: 采用回顾性设计,对 233 份 CBCT 报告和探查图像进行了评估。方法:采用回顾性设计对 233 份 CBCT 报告和探查图像进行评估,使用 Kappa 统计量和符合百分比来评估观察者内部和观察者之间的可重复性以及探查图像和 CBCT 报告之间的一致性:结果:观察者内部和观察者之间的再现性总体较低(卡帕范围在-0.008 到 1.000 之间)。CBCT 和探查报告结果之间的一致性也很低。由于探查图像的尺寸较大,在探查图像中发现的114颗阻生牙、1个根尖牙周炎和2个窦的情况没有记录在全量报告中:结论:与 CBCT 容量相比,探查图像结果的再现性很低,而且探查图像几乎没有显示额外的诊断信息:这项研究表明,虽然观察探查图像的再现性很低,但如果不对探查图像进行评估,罕见的发现可能会被忽略。需要讨论有关解释探查图像的立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信