Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads

IF 5.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Jérôme Martin, Christophe Ringeval and Vincent Vennin
{"title":"Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads","authors":"Jérôme Martin, Christophe Ringeval and Vincent Vennin","doi":"10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The capability of Cosmic Inflation to explain the latest Cosmic Microwave Background and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation data is assessed by performing Bayesian model comparison within the landscape of nearly three-hundred models of single-field slow-roll inflation. We present the first Bayesian data analysis based on the third-order slow-roll primordial power spectra. In particular, the fourth Hubble-flow function ε4 remains unbounded while the third function verifies, at two-sigma, ε3 ∈[-0.4,0.5], which is perfectly compatible with the slow-roll predictions for the running of the spectral index. We also observe some residual excess of B-modes within the BICEP/Keck data favoring, at a non-statistically significant level, non-vanishing primordial tensor modes: log(ε1) > -3.9, at 68% confidence level. Then, for 287 models of single-field inflation, we compute the Bayesian evidence, the Bayesian dimensionality and the marginalized posteriors of all the models' parameters, including the ones associated with the reheating era. The average information gain on the reheating parameter Rreh reaches 1.3 ± 0.18 bits, which is more than a factor two improvement compared to the first Planck data release. As such, inflationary model predictions cannot meet data accuracy without specifying, or marginalizing over, the reheating kinematics. We also find that more than 40% of the scenarios are now strongly disfavored, which shows that the constraining power of cosmological data is winning against the increase of the number of proposed models. In addition, about 20% of all models have evidences within the most probable region and are all favored according to the Jeffreys' scale of Bayesian evidences.","PeriodicalId":15445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The capability of Cosmic Inflation to explain the latest Cosmic Microwave Background and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation data is assessed by performing Bayesian model comparison within the landscape of nearly three-hundred models of single-field slow-roll inflation. We present the first Bayesian data analysis based on the third-order slow-roll primordial power spectra. In particular, the fourth Hubble-flow function ε4 remains unbounded while the third function verifies, at two-sigma, ε3 ∈[-0.4,0.5], which is perfectly compatible with the slow-roll predictions for the running of the spectral index. We also observe some residual excess of B-modes within the BICEP/Keck data favoring, at a non-statistically significant level, non-vanishing primordial tensor modes: log(ε1) > -3.9, at 68% confidence level. Then, for 287 models of single-field inflation, we compute the Bayesian evidence, the Bayesian dimensionality and the marginalized posteriors of all the models' parameters, including the ones associated with the reheating era. The average information gain on the reheating parameter Rreh reaches 1.3 ± 0.18 bits, which is more than a factor two improvement compared to the first Planck data release. As such, inflationary model predictions cannot meet data accuracy without specifying, or marginalizing over, the reheating kinematics. We also find that more than 40% of the scenarios are now strongly disfavored, which shows that the constraining power of cosmological data is winning against the increase of the number of proposed models. In addition, about 20% of all models have evidences within the most probable region and are all favored according to the Jeffreys' scale of Bayesian evidences.
处于十字路口的宇宙膨胀
通过在近三百个单场慢卷膨胀模型中进行贝叶斯模型比较,评估了宇宙膨胀解释最新宇宙微波背景和重子声振荡数据的能力。我们首次提出了基于三阶慢滚原始功率谱的贝叶斯数据分析。特别是,第四哈勃流函数ε4仍然是无界的,而第三个函数在二σ时验证了ε3∈[-0.4,0.5],这与慢卷预测的光谱指数运行完全一致。我们还在 BICEP/Keck 数据中观察到了一些残余的过量 B 模式,在非统计显著水平上倾向于非消失的原始张量模式:在 68% 的置信水平上,log(ε1) > -3.9。然后,对于 287 个单场暴胀模型,我们计算了所有模型参数的贝叶斯证据、贝叶斯维度和边际后验,包括与再热时代相关的参数。再热参数 Rreh 的平均信息增益达到了 1.3 ± 0.18 比特,比第一次普朗克数据发布时提高了两倍多。因此,如果不指定或边缘化再热运动学,暴胀模型预测就无法达到数据精度。我们还发现,现在有 40% 以上的方案被强烈否定,这表明宇宙学数据的约束能力正在战胜所提出模型数量的增加。此外,在所有模型中,约有 20% 的模型的证据都在最有可能的区域内,而且根据杰弗里斯贝叶斯证据尺度,所有模型都被看好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
23.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (JCAP) encompasses theoretical, observational and experimental areas as well as computation and simulation. The journal covers the latest developments in the theory of all fundamental interactions and their cosmological implications (e.g. M-theory and cosmology, brane cosmology). JCAP''s coverage also includes topics such as formation, dynamics and clustering of galaxies, pre-galactic star formation, x-ray astronomy, radio astronomy, gravitational lensing, active galactic nuclei, intergalactic and interstellar matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信