Assessing marginal effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 across Africa: a hybrid modeling study.

Yvette Montcho, Sidoine Dako, Valère Kolawole Salako, Chénangnon Frédéric Tovissodé, Martin Wolkewitz, Romain Glèlè Kakaï
{"title":"Assessing marginal effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 across Africa: a hybrid modeling study.","authors":"Yvette Montcho, Sidoine Dako, Valère Kolawole Salako, Chénangnon Frédéric Tovissodé, Martin Wolkewitz, Romain Glèlè Kakaï","doi":"10.1093/imammb/dqae013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2019, a new strain of coronavirus has challenged global health systems. Due its fragile healthcare systems, Africa was predicted to be the most affected continent. However, past experiences of African countries with epidemics and other factors, including actions taken by governments, have contributed to reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to assess the marginal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions in fifteen African countries during the pre-vaccination period. To describe the transmission dynamics and control of SARS-CoV-2 spread, an extended time-dependent SEIR model was used. The transmission rate of each infectious stage was obtained using a logistic model with NPI intensity as a covariate. The results revealed that the effects of NPIs varied between countries. Overall, restrictive measures related to assembly had, in most countries, the largest reducing effects on the pre-symptomatic and mild transmission, while the transmission by severe individuals is influenced by privacy measures (more than $10\\%$). Countries should develop efficient alternatives to assembly restrictions to preserve the economic sector. This involves e.g. training in digital tools and strengthening digital infrastructures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94130,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA","volume":" ","pages":"225-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqae013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2019, a new strain of coronavirus has challenged global health systems. Due its fragile healthcare systems, Africa was predicted to be the most affected continent. However, past experiences of African countries with epidemics and other factors, including actions taken by governments, have contributed to reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to assess the marginal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions in fifteen African countries during the pre-vaccination period. To describe the transmission dynamics and control of SARS-CoV-2 spread, an extended time-dependent SEIR model was used. The transmission rate of each infectious stage was obtained using a logistic model with NPI intensity as a covariate. The results revealed that the effects of NPIs varied between countries. Overall, restrictive measures related to assembly had, in most countries, the largest reducing effects on the pre-symptomatic and mild transmission, while the transmission by severe individuals is influenced by privacy measures (more than $10\%$). Countries should develop efficient alternatives to assembly restrictions to preserve the economic sector. This involves e.g. training in digital tools and strengthening digital infrastructures.

评估非药物干预对 SARS-CoV-2 跨非洲传播的边际效应:混合模型研究
自 2019 年以来,一种新型冠状病毒菌株对全球医疗系统构成了挑战。由于其脆弱的医疗保健系统,非洲被预测为受影响最严重的大陆。然而,非洲国家过去的流行病经验和其他因素(包括政府采取的行动)有助于减少 SARS-CoV-2 的传播。本研究旨在评估非洲十五个国家在疫苗接种前的非药物干预措施的边际影响。为了描述 SARS-CoV-2 的传播动态和传播控制,我们使用了一个扩展的时间依赖性 SEIR 模型。每个感染阶段的传播率是通过一个以 NPI 强度为协变量的逻辑模型得出的。结果显示,非传染性疾病的影响因国家而异。总体而言,在大多数国家,与集会有关的限制性措施对无症状前和轻度传播的降低作用最大,而重度个体的传播则受到隐私措施的影响(超过 10%)。各国应制定替代集会限制的有效措施,以保护经济部门。这包括数字工具培训和加强数字基础设施等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信