Lorenzo Berra, Kyle J Medeiros, Francesco Marrazzo, Sarvagna Patel, David Imber, Emanuele Rezoagli, Binglan Yu, Abraham Sonny, Edward A Bittner, Daniel Fisher, Daniel Chipman, Rohit Sharma, Hardik Shah, Brianna E Gray, N Stuart Harris, Fumito Ichinose, Vamsi K Mootha
{"title":"Feasibility of Delivering 5-Day Normobaric Hypoxia Breathing in a Hospital Setting.","authors":"Lorenzo Berra, Kyle J Medeiros, Francesco Marrazzo, Sarvagna Patel, David Imber, Emanuele Rezoagli, Binglan Yu, Abraham Sonny, Edward A Bittner, Daniel Fisher, Daniel Chipman, Rohit Sharma, Hardik Shah, Brianna E Gray, N Stuart Harris, Fumito Ichinose, Vamsi K Mootha","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beneficial effects of breathing at [Formula: see text] < 0.21 on disease outcomes have been reported in previous preclinical and clinical studies. However, the safety and intra-hospital feasibility of breathing hypoxic gas for 5 d have not been established. In this study, we examined the physiologic effects of breathing a gas mixture with [Formula: see text] as low as 0.11 in 5 healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 5 subjects completed the study, spending 5 consecutive days in a hypoxic tent, where the ambient oxygen level was lowered in a stepwise manner over 5 d, from [Formula: see text] of 0.16 on the first day to [Formula: see text] of 0.11 on the fifth day of the study. All the subjects returned to an environment at room air on the sixth day. The subjects' [Formula: see text], heart rate, and breathing frequency were continuously recorded, along with daily blood sampling, neurologic evaluations, transthoracic echocardiography, and mental status assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breathing hypoxia concentration dependently caused profound physiologic changes, including decreased [Formula: see text] and increased heart rate. At [Formula: see text] of 0.14, the mean [Formula: see text] was 92%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.13, the mean [Formula: see text] was 93%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.12, the mean [Formula: see text] was 88%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.11, the mean [Formula: see text] was 85%; and, finally, at an [Formula: see text] of 0.21, the mean [Formula: see text] was 98%. These changes were accompanied by increased erythropoietin levels and reticulocyte counts in blood. All 5 subjects concluded the study with no adverse events. No subjects exhibited signs of mental status changes or pulmonary hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of the current physiologic study suggests that, within a hospital setting, delivering [Formula: see text] as low as 0.11 is feasible and safe in healthy subjects, and provides the foundation for future studies in which therapeutic effects of hypoxia breathing are tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1400-1408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Beneficial effects of breathing at [Formula: see text] < 0.21 on disease outcomes have been reported in previous preclinical and clinical studies. However, the safety and intra-hospital feasibility of breathing hypoxic gas for 5 d have not been established. In this study, we examined the physiologic effects of breathing a gas mixture with [Formula: see text] as low as 0.11 in 5 healthy volunteers.
Methods: All 5 subjects completed the study, spending 5 consecutive days in a hypoxic tent, where the ambient oxygen level was lowered in a stepwise manner over 5 d, from [Formula: see text] of 0.16 on the first day to [Formula: see text] of 0.11 on the fifth day of the study. All the subjects returned to an environment at room air on the sixth day. The subjects' [Formula: see text], heart rate, and breathing frequency were continuously recorded, along with daily blood sampling, neurologic evaluations, transthoracic echocardiography, and mental status assessments.
Results: Breathing hypoxia concentration dependently caused profound physiologic changes, including decreased [Formula: see text] and increased heart rate. At [Formula: see text] of 0.14, the mean [Formula: see text] was 92%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.13, the mean [Formula: see text] was 93%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.12, the mean [Formula: see text] was 88%; at [Formula: see text] of 0.11, the mean [Formula: see text] was 85%; and, finally, at an [Formula: see text] of 0.21, the mean [Formula: see text] was 98%. These changes were accompanied by increased erythropoietin levels and reticulocyte counts in blood. All 5 subjects concluded the study with no adverse events. No subjects exhibited signs of mental status changes or pulmonary hypertension.
Conclusions: Results of the current physiologic study suggests that, within a hospital setting, delivering [Formula: see text] as low as 0.11 is feasible and safe in healthy subjects, and provides the foundation for future studies in which therapeutic effects of hypoxia breathing are tested.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.