Outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation of cervical nerves for the treatment of chronic pain.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/papr.13402
Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lukas J Henjum, Barnabas T Shiferaw, Andrew Y Matta, James N Nitz, Zoie L Weber, Jalon M Jones, Kenneth J Fiala
{"title":"Outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation of cervical nerves for the treatment of chronic pain.","authors":"Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lukas J Henjum, Barnabas T Shiferaw, Andrew Y Matta, James N Nitz, Zoie L Weber, Jalon M Jones, Kenneth J Fiala","doi":"10.1111/papr.13402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain, defined as pain persisting for more than 3-6 months, has a mean one-year prevalence in the United States of 25.8% and is one of the most frequent reasons adults seek medical care. Treatment options include physical therapy, analgesics, anticonvulsants, exercise, and muscle relaxants. Even with conventional treatment modalities, in a subset of patients, pain may persist. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA), a minimally invasive therapy, employs thermal energy generated by electrical currents to disrupt the transmission of pain stimuli along nociceptive pathways. This leads to an attenuation of pain impulses, primarily through nerve tissue necrosis. The potential of c-RFA to alleviate chronic pain for patients who struggle to find relief elsewhere accentuates the importance of rigorously investigating its outcomes. This study investigates whether patients receiving c-RFA for relief of chronic neck pain caused by cervical facet joint arthropathy experience a reduction in pain scores, the length of this reduction in pain scores, and the magnitude of this reduction in pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of data extracted from UW-Health Electronic Medical Health records (EMR), encompassing cervical c-RFA procedures performed from 2015 through 2022. Patient data were obtained, including diagnosis, pre-operative pain score, post-operative pain score, duration of relief, patient age, sex, and BMI. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to statistically analyze the pre-operative and post-operative pain scores, in which a p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 450 cervical c-RFA procedures were reviewed, 152 were excluded due to absent pre- or post-op pain scores. 298 were included in the analysis, comprising 203 unique patients: 129 females and 74 males with an average age of 56.03 ± 12.76 and a BMI of 28.76 ± 6.05. Improvement of pain symptoms was reported in 85.23% (n = 263), 6% (n = 19) reported complete pain remission, 8.72% (n = 26) reported no change, and 3.02% (n = 9) reported worsening symptoms. Patients reported an average pre-operative pain score of 6.15 (M = 6.15, SD = 1.55) and an average post-operative pain score of 3.64 (M = 3.64, SD = 2.09) this achieved significance (p < 0.0001). Of the 85.23% (n = 263) charts that noted improvement, there is an average of 48.04% ± 26.53 reduction from their pre-operative pain scores. The average duration of relief lasted 6.67 ± 4.84 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the potential efficacy of c-RFA as a minimally invasive treatment for chronic neck pain secondary to cervical facet joint arthropathy refractory to conventional treatment measures, demonstrating significant relief for a substantial length of time. Due to chronic pain's detrimental effect on one's quality of life, finding effective treatment options is essential, especially for those refractory to conventional treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain, defined as pain persisting for more than 3-6 months, has a mean one-year prevalence in the United States of 25.8% and is one of the most frequent reasons adults seek medical care. Treatment options include physical therapy, analgesics, anticonvulsants, exercise, and muscle relaxants. Even with conventional treatment modalities, in a subset of patients, pain may persist. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA), a minimally invasive therapy, employs thermal energy generated by electrical currents to disrupt the transmission of pain stimuli along nociceptive pathways. This leads to an attenuation of pain impulses, primarily through nerve tissue necrosis. The potential of c-RFA to alleviate chronic pain for patients who struggle to find relief elsewhere accentuates the importance of rigorously investigating its outcomes. This study investigates whether patients receiving c-RFA for relief of chronic neck pain caused by cervical facet joint arthropathy experience a reduction in pain scores, the length of this reduction in pain scores, and the magnitude of this reduction in pain.

Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data extracted from UW-Health Electronic Medical Health records (EMR), encompassing cervical c-RFA procedures performed from 2015 through 2022. Patient data were obtained, including diagnosis, pre-operative pain score, post-operative pain score, duration of relief, patient age, sex, and BMI. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to statistically analyze the pre-operative and post-operative pain scores, in which a p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 450 cervical c-RFA procedures were reviewed, 152 were excluded due to absent pre- or post-op pain scores. 298 were included in the analysis, comprising 203 unique patients: 129 females and 74 males with an average age of 56.03 ± 12.76 and a BMI of 28.76 ± 6.05. Improvement of pain symptoms was reported in 85.23% (n = 263), 6% (n = 19) reported complete pain remission, 8.72% (n = 26) reported no change, and 3.02% (n = 9) reported worsening symptoms. Patients reported an average pre-operative pain score of 6.15 (M = 6.15, SD = 1.55) and an average post-operative pain score of 3.64 (M = 3.64, SD = 2.09) this achieved significance (p < 0.0001). Of the 85.23% (n = 263) charts that noted improvement, there is an average of 48.04% ± 26.53 reduction from their pre-operative pain scores. The average duration of relief lasted 6.67 ± 4.84 months.

Conclusion: This study supports the potential efficacy of c-RFA as a minimally invasive treatment for chronic neck pain secondary to cervical facet joint arthropathy refractory to conventional treatment measures, demonstrating significant relief for a substantial length of time. Due to chronic pain's detrimental effect on one's quality of life, finding effective treatment options is essential, especially for those refractory to conventional treatments.

颈椎神经冷却射频消融术治疗慢性疼痛的疗效。
背景:慢性疼痛的定义是疼痛持续超过 3-6 个月,在美国一年的平均发病率为 25.8%,是成年人就医的最常见原因之一。治疗方法包括物理治疗、止痛药、抗惊厥药、运动和肌肉松弛剂。即使采用常规治疗方法,部分患者的疼痛仍可能持续存在。冷却射频消融术(c-RFA)是一种微创疗法,它利用电流产生的热能破坏疼痛刺激沿着痛觉通路的传递。这主要通过神经组织坏死来减弱疼痛脉冲。c-RFA 有可能减轻那些在其他地方难以找到缓解方法的患者的慢性疼痛,这就凸显了对其结果进行严格研究的重要性。本研究调查了接受 c-RFA 治疗以缓解颈椎面关节关节病引起的慢性颈部疼痛的患者是否会减轻疼痛评分、减轻疼痛评分的持续时间以及减轻疼痛的程度:本研究对从华大健康电子医疗健康记录(EMR)中提取的数据进行了回顾性分析,这些数据涵盖了从 2015 年到 2022 年进行的颈椎 c-RFA 手术。获得的患者数据包括诊断、术前疼痛评分、术后疼痛评分、缓解持续时间、患者年龄、性别和体重指数。采用双尾配对t检验对术前和术后疼痛评分进行统计分析,P值≤0.05为显著:共审查了 450 例颈椎 c-RFA 手术,其中 152 例因没有术前或术后疼痛评分而被排除。298例纳入分析,包括203名患者:其中女性 129 人,男性 74 人,平均年龄(56.03±12.76)岁,体重指数(28.76±6.05)。85.23%(n = 263)的患者疼痛症状有所改善,6%(n = 19)的患者疼痛症状完全缓解,8.72%(n = 26)的患者疼痛症状无变化,3.02%(n = 9)的患者疼痛症状恶化。患者术前平均疼痛评分为 6.15 分(中位数 = 6.15,标化率 = 1.55),术后平均疼痛评分为 3.64 分(中位数 = 3.64,标化率 = 2.09),差异有显著性(P 结论:该研究证实了椎管内注射疗法的潜在疗效:这项研究证实了 c-RFA 作为一种微创疗法,对常规治疗措施难治的颈椎面关节病继发的慢性颈部疼痛具有潜在疗效,并在相当长的时间内显示出明显的缓解作用。由于慢性疼痛会影响患者的生活质量,因此找到有效的治疗方案至关重要,尤其是对于那些对传统治疗方法难治的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信