Shape and Size of the Annulus Fibrosus Excision Alters the Biomechanics of the Intervertebral Disc.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mao-Dan Nie, Ze-Bin Huang, Rong-Shan Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Ji-Ping Zhang, Ling-Jie Fu, Cheng-Kung Cheng
{"title":"Shape and Size of the Annulus Fibrosus Excision Alters the Biomechanics of the Intervertebral Disc.","authors":"Mao-Dan Nie, Ze-Bin Huang, Rong-Shan Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Ji-Ping Zhang, Ling-Jie Fu, Cheng-Kung Cheng","doi":"10.1177/21925682241270090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical testings and finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate how annulus fibrosus (AF) incision size (RIS, Ratio of incision width to AF height) and shape affect intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated finite element model of lumbar spines simulated various incisions in the middle-right posterior region of the AF, with different sizes and shapes. Simulations included axial compression, flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Parameters assessed included stability, re-herniation, and IVD degeneration by analyzing stress, height, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incision increased AF stress and ROM under 3 Nm moment, with values rising as RIS increased. RIS exceeding 40% resulted in a 20% AF stress increase during compression and extension, while RIS over 50% led to over 20% AF stress increase during other motions. Incision stress also increased with higher RIS, particularly surpassing 50% RIS. IDP rose across all incision shapes. Endplate stress increased (9.9%-48.9%) with larger incisions, with average increases of 12.8%, 12.7%, 30.5%, and 22.8% for circular, oval, square, and rectangular incisions. Compression and rotation minimally affected NP pressure (<15%), while flexion (19.8%-38.8%) and bending (18.5%-43.9%) had a more pronounced effect. ROM increased with RIS (20.0% ∼ 77.4%), especially with an incision RIS exceeding 40%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF injury elevates AF stress, reduces spine stability, heightens degeneration risk with increasing RIS. Reherniation risk rises when RIS exceeds 40%. Circular or oval incisions maintain spine biomechanics better than square or rectangular ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241270090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Biomechanical testings and finite element analysis.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate how annulus fibrosus (AF) incision size (RIS, Ratio of incision width to AF height) and shape affect intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics.

Methods: A validated finite element model of lumbar spines simulated various incisions in the middle-right posterior region of the AF, with different sizes and shapes. Simulations included axial compression, flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Parameters assessed included stability, re-herniation, and IVD degeneration by analyzing stress, height, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the range of motion (ROM).

Results: Incision increased AF stress and ROM under 3 Nm moment, with values rising as RIS increased. RIS exceeding 40% resulted in a 20% AF stress increase during compression and extension, while RIS over 50% led to over 20% AF stress increase during other motions. Incision stress also increased with higher RIS, particularly surpassing 50% RIS. IDP rose across all incision shapes. Endplate stress increased (9.9%-48.9%) with larger incisions, with average increases of 12.8%, 12.7%, 30.5%, and 22.8% for circular, oval, square, and rectangular incisions. Compression and rotation minimally affected NP pressure (<15%), while flexion (19.8%-38.8%) and bending (18.5%-43.9%) had a more pronounced effect. ROM increased with RIS (20.0% ∼ 77.4%), especially with an incision RIS exceeding 40%.

Conclusions: AF injury elevates AF stress, reduces spine stability, heightens degeneration risk with increasing RIS. Reherniation risk rises when RIS exceeds 40%. Circular or oval incisions maintain spine biomechanics better than square or rectangular ones.

纤维环切除的形状和大小改变了椎间盘的生物力学。
研究设计生物力学测试和有限元分析:本研究旨在探讨纤维环切口大小(RIS,切口宽度与纤维环高度之比)和形状如何影响椎间盘(IVD)生物力学:经过验证的腰椎有限元模型模拟了椎间盘突出症(AF)中右后区不同大小和形状的各种切口。模拟包括轴向压缩、屈曲、伸展、弯曲和旋转。通过分析应力、高度、椎间盘内压力(IDP)和活动范围(ROM),评估的参数包括稳定性、再疝和 IVD 退化:结果:在3牛米力矩下,切口增加了房颤应力和ROM,随着RIS的增加,应力和ROM值也随之增加。RIS 超过 40% 会导致压缩和伸展时的 AF 应力增加 20%,而 RIS 超过 50% 则会导致其他运动时的 AF 应力增加 20% 以上。切口应力也随着 RIS 的增加而增加,特别是 RIS 超过 50%。所有切口形状的IDP都有所增加。切口越大,终板应力越高(9.9%-48.9%),圆形、椭圆形、方形和矩形切口的平均增幅分别为12.8%、12.7%、30.5%和22.8%。压迫和旋转对 NP 压力的影响很小(结论:房颤损伤会增加房颤应力,降低脊柱稳定性,并随着 RIS 的增加而增加退变风险。当 RIS 超过 40% 时,再疝风险上升。圆形或椭圆形切口比方形或矩形切口更能保持脊柱的生物力学特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信