{"title":"Molecular dynamics study on the physical compatibility of SEBS/plasticizer blend systems","authors":"Weilu Yang, Xu Chen, Xiuduo Song, Yiwen Hu, Jiangfeng Pei, Junbo Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00894-024-06085-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Thermoplastic elastomer styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymer (SEBS) has excellent mechanical properties and aging resistance, so it has good application prospects in thermoplastic solid propellants. The selection of plasticizer is one of the keys to the formulation design of thermoplastic solid propellant. The compatibility of the plasticizer with the polymer determines the plasticizer’s ability to plasticize the polymer’s molecular chain segments. Herein, the compatibility of four plasticizers with SEBS was investigated, and the results declared that the order of compatibility between SEBS and the four plasticizers is SEBS/WO > SEBS/DOS > SEBS/DEP > SEBS/TA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Physical compatibility of SEBS binder with plasticizer triacetin (TA), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dioctyl sebacate (DOS), and 26# industrial white oil (WO) was simulated using molecular dynamics (MD) method via Materials Studio 8.0, and the simulation results were verified experimentally. The results showed that the compatibility of SEBS with these plasticizers can be comprehensively evaluated by analyzing solubility parameters, radial distribution functions, and blend miscibility simulations.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><p>The compatibility of SEBS with several plasticizers was comprehensively evaluated by analyzing solubility parameters, radial distribution functions, and blend simulations, and the simulation results were verified via experiments.</p>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-024-06085-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
Thermoplastic elastomer styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymer (SEBS) has excellent mechanical properties and aging resistance, so it has good application prospects in thermoplastic solid propellants. The selection of plasticizer is one of the keys to the formulation design of thermoplastic solid propellant. The compatibility of the plasticizer with the polymer determines the plasticizer’s ability to plasticize the polymer’s molecular chain segments. Herein, the compatibility of four plasticizers with SEBS was investigated, and the results declared that the order of compatibility between SEBS and the four plasticizers is SEBS/WO > SEBS/DOS > SEBS/DEP > SEBS/TA.
Methods
Physical compatibility of SEBS binder with plasticizer triacetin (TA), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dioctyl sebacate (DOS), and 26# industrial white oil (WO) was simulated using molecular dynamics (MD) method via Materials Studio 8.0, and the simulation results were verified experimentally. The results showed that the compatibility of SEBS with these plasticizers can be comprehensively evaluated by analyzing solubility parameters, radial distribution functions, and blend miscibility simulations.
Graphical Abstract
The compatibility of SEBS with several plasticizers was comprehensively evaluated by analyzing solubility parameters, radial distribution functions, and blend simulations, and the simulation results were verified via experiments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling.
Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry.
Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.