Challenges in the popularization of wild food plants in Brazil: An examination from the perspectives of consumer science

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Élida Monique da Costa Santos , Danúbia Lins Gomes , Roberto Gomes Cardoso , Déborah Monteiro Barbosa , Luis Fernando Colin-Nolasco , Gabriela Maria Cota dos Santos , Daniel Barbosa Costa Melo , Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque , Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva , Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros
{"title":"Challenges in the popularization of wild food plants in Brazil: An examination from the perspectives of consumer science","authors":"Élida Monique da Costa Santos ,&nbsp;Danúbia Lins Gomes ,&nbsp;Roberto Gomes Cardoso ,&nbsp;Déborah Monteiro Barbosa ,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Colin-Nolasco ,&nbsp;Gabriela Maria Cota dos Santos ,&nbsp;Daniel Barbosa Costa Melo ,&nbsp;Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque ,&nbsp;Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva ,&nbsp;Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When associated with sustainable management strategies, wild food plants (WFP) have great potential to increase the income of local populations and diversify food systems. However, in the urban Brazilian context, most of these plants are still unknown or underutilized. This research aimed to identify biases in the acceptance of WFP-based food products. For this purpose, we conducted two experiments on expectation and acceptability evaluation. In the first, we prepared juices and sweet coconut (<em>cocadas</em>) from both WFPs and conventional plant products and tested whether the mixture of WFP + conventional plant creates greater expectation and acceptance by the consumers than products made only with WFP. We also identified the socioeconomic factors that influence expectation and acceptance. In the second experiment, we prepared juices with wild plants (<em>cambuí</em> and <em>araçá</em>) and conventional plants (<em>acerola</em> and <em>guava</em>) and tested whether the terminological association of WFP with conventional plants and terminological clues about forest origin influence the expectation and acceptance of the products. Our results indicate that gastronomic mixtures act as a barrier breaker for food neophobia and provide consumers with greater familiarity with the food, increasing the chances of incorporating WFP into the human diet. In general, older individuals, those with higher education and income, and non-neophobic individuals gave better ratings for appropriateness expectation, and all these variables, including male gender, gave better ratings for acceptance of WFP-based foods. The terminological association with a conventional plant did not influence the expectation and acceptability of the products. The terminological association with forest origin did not interfere with expectation and acceptance, but there was a negative influence of the indication of forest origin on flavor expectation for the neophobic group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48594,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X24001227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When associated with sustainable management strategies, wild food plants (WFP) have great potential to increase the income of local populations and diversify food systems. However, in the urban Brazilian context, most of these plants are still unknown or underutilized. This research aimed to identify biases in the acceptance of WFP-based food products. For this purpose, we conducted two experiments on expectation and acceptability evaluation. In the first, we prepared juices and sweet coconut (cocadas) from both WFPs and conventional plant products and tested whether the mixture of WFP + conventional plant creates greater expectation and acceptance by the consumers than products made only with WFP. We also identified the socioeconomic factors that influence expectation and acceptance. In the second experiment, we prepared juices with wild plants (cambuí and araçá) and conventional plants (acerola and guava) and tested whether the terminological association of WFP with conventional plants and terminological clues about forest origin influence the expectation and acceptance of the products. Our results indicate that gastronomic mixtures act as a barrier breaker for food neophobia and provide consumers with greater familiarity with the food, increasing the chances of incorporating WFP into the human diet. In general, older individuals, those with higher education and income, and non-neophobic individuals gave better ratings for appropriateness expectation, and all these variables, including male gender, gave better ratings for acceptance of WFP-based foods. The terminological association with a conventional plant did not influence the expectation and acceptability of the products. The terminological association with forest origin did not interfere with expectation and acceptance, but there was a negative influence of the indication of forest origin on flavor expectation for the neophobic group.

在巴西普及野生食用植物的挑战:从消费科学的角度看问题
野生食用植物(WFP)如果与可持续管理战略相结合,则具有增加当地居民收入和使食物系统多样化的巨大潜力。然而,在巴西的城市环境中,大多数野生食用植物仍不为人知或未得到充分利用。这项研究旨在找出人们在接受以 WFP 为基础的食品时存在的偏差。为此,我们进行了两项关于期望值和可接受性评估的实验。在第一个实验中,我们用粮食计划署和传统植物产品制作了果汁和甜椰子(cocadas),并测试了粮食计划署和传统植物的混合物是否比只用粮食计划署制作的产品更能引起消费者的期望和接受。我们还确定了影响期望值和接受度的社会经济因素。在第二个实验中,我们用野生植物(cambuí 和 araçá)和传统植物(针叶樱桃和番石榴)制备果汁,并测试了 WFP 与传统植物的术语关联以及有关森林原产地的术语线索是否会影响产品的期望值和接受度。我们的研究结果表明,美食混合物可作为食物新恐惧症的障碍物,让消费者对食物更加熟悉,从而增加将世界粮食计划署纳入人类饮食的机会。一般来说,年龄较大者、教育程度较高者、收入较高者和无恐新症者对适当性期望的评分较高,而所有这些变量,包括男性性别,对基于世界粮食计划署的食品的接受度评分较高。与传统植物相关的术语并不影响产品的期望值和可接受性。与森林原产地相关的术语并不影响期望值和接受度,但森林原产地对新恐高症群体的风味期望值有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
170
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science is a peer-reviewed journal that explicitly focuses on the interface of food science and gastronomy. Articles focusing only on food science will not be considered. This journal equally encourages both scientists and chefs to publish original scientific papers, review articles and original culinary works. We seek articles with clear evidence of this interaction. From a scientific perspective, this publication aims to become the home for research from the whole community of food science and gastronomy. IJGFS explores all aspects related to the growing field of the interaction of gastronomy and food science, in areas such as food chemistry, food technology and culinary techniques, food microbiology, genetics, sensory science, neuroscience, psychology, culinary concepts, culinary trends, and gastronomic experience (all the elements that contribute to the appreciation and enjoyment of the meal. Also relevant is research on science-based educational programs in gastronomy, anthropology, gastronomic history and food sociology. All these areas of knowledge are crucial to gastronomy, as they contribute to a better understanding of this broad term and its practical implications for science and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信