Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Richard O'Dwyer , Mihaela G. Musat , Ioana Gulas , Elizabeth Hubscher , Hoora Moradian , Silke Guenther , Mairead Kearney , Srikala S. Sridhar
{"title":"Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Richard O'Dwyer ,&nbsp;Mihaela G. Musat ,&nbsp;Ioana Gulas ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hubscher ,&nbsp;Hoora Moradian ,&nbsp;Silke Guenther ,&nbsp;Mairead Kearney ,&nbsp;Srikala S. Sridhar","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age &gt; 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001472/pdfft?md5=e38cab7f362ab1d33da43736c08b07ab&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001472-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC).

Results

Among 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age > 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC).

Conclusions

This is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.

分剂量顺铂治疗局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者:系统性文献综述和网络荟萃分析
背景吉西他滨加顺铂(GC)是治疗局部晚期/转移性尿路上皮癌(la/mUC)的高活性常用方案。使用GC时,顺铂剂量为70毫克/平方米,每3周为一个周期;然而,对于许多患者来说,肾功能或心脏功能受损、神经病变或表现状态不佳(PS)都可能导致无法使用顺铂。方法我们进行了系统文献综述(SLR)和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以更好地了解分剂量 GC 与吉西他滨加卡铂(GCa)、GC 以及甲氨蝶呤、长春新碱、多柔比星和顺铂(MVAC)的治疗模式、有效性和安全性比较。结果在 120 项已确定的研究中,有 16 项研究(代表 1,767 名患者)纳入了分剂量 GC。选择分剂量 GC 的常见原因是肾功能受损、年龄超过 70 岁、合并症和医生偏好。分剂量 GC 的客观反应率(ORR)为 39%-80%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 3.5-9.9 个月,中位总生存期(OS)为 8.5-18.1 个月。不良反应导致的停药率为5%-38%。在 NMA 中,分剂量 GC 的 ORR 明显高于 GCa。分剂量 GC 的 PFS 和 OS 与其他治疗方案(GCa、GC 和 MVAC)相似。尽管纳入的有限研究存在异质性,但分次给药 GC 的有效性和安全性与其他疗法相当。因此,分次给药 GC 有可能扩大有资格接受顺铂治疗方案的 la/mUC 人群,值得进一步开展前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信