Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Richard O'Dwyer , Mihaela G. Musat , Ioana Gulas , Elizabeth Hubscher , Hoora Moradian , Silke Guenther , Mairead Kearney , Srikala S. Sridhar
{"title":"Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Richard O'Dwyer ,&nbsp;Mihaela G. Musat ,&nbsp;Ioana Gulas ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hubscher ,&nbsp;Hoora Moradian ,&nbsp;Silke Guenther ,&nbsp;Mairead Kearney ,&nbsp;Srikala S. Sridhar","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age &gt; 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"22 6","pages":"Article 102176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001472/pdfft?md5=e38cab7f362ab1d33da43736c08b07ab&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001472-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC).

Results

Among 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age > 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC).

Conclusions

This is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.

分剂量顺铂治疗局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者:系统性文献综述和网络荟萃分析
背景吉西他滨加顺铂(GC)是治疗局部晚期/转移性尿路上皮癌(la/mUC)的高活性常用方案。使用GC时,顺铂剂量为70毫克/平方米,每3周为一个周期;然而,对于许多患者来说,肾功能或心脏功能受损、神经病变或表现状态不佳(PS)都可能导致无法使用顺铂。方法我们进行了系统文献综述(SLR)和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以更好地了解分剂量 GC 与吉西他滨加卡铂(GCa)、GC 以及甲氨蝶呤、长春新碱、多柔比星和顺铂(MVAC)的治疗模式、有效性和安全性比较。结果在 120 项已确定的研究中,有 16 项研究(代表 1,767 名患者)纳入了分剂量 GC。选择分剂量 GC 的常见原因是肾功能受损、年龄超过 70 岁、合并症和医生偏好。分剂量 GC 的客观反应率(ORR)为 39%-80%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 3.5-9.9 个月,中位总生存期(OS)为 8.5-18.1 个月。不良反应导致的停药率为5%-38%。在 NMA 中,分剂量 GC 的 ORR 明显高于 GCa。分剂量 GC 的 PFS 和 OS 与其他治疗方案(GCa、GC 和 MVAC)相似。尽管纳入的有限研究存在异质性,但分次给药 GC 的有效性和安全性与其他疗法相当。因此,分次给药 GC 有可能扩大有资格接受顺铂治疗方案的 la/mUC 人群,值得进一步开展前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Clinical genitourinary cancer 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
201
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信