P32. Morphological analysis of OPLL progression in cervical spinal cord injury cases treated with posterior fusion

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"P32. Morphological analysis of OPLL progression in cervical spinal cord injury cases treated with posterior fusion","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background Context</h3><p>The patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) have a high frequency in Asian, with a reported incidence of 6.3% in Japan. The presence of OPLL is a risk factor for cervical spinal cord injury, with some cases resulting from minor trauma such as falls. In previous studies, the characteristics of OPLL after surgery were mentioned, however, there is no consensus on cervical spinal cord injury with OPLL after fusion surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the natural progress of ossification in cervical spinal cord injury cases with OPLL treated by posterior fusion surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design/Setting</h3><p>Study design is retrospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Patient Sample</h3><p>The subjects included 42 cases of cervical spinal cord injuries with OPLL that underwent posterior fusion surgery between 2017 and 2021 and were amenable to follow-up with CT for more than 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome Measures</h3><p>N/A.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We investigated the presence or absence of union of the OPLL at the level of the spinal cord injury on postoperative CT and the presence or absence of ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL) on CT at the time of injury. We measured the thickness of OPLL at the level of injury by CT at the time of injury and 6 months after surgery and calculated the difference in the thickness of OPLL. We divided the subjects into two groups: one with the union of OPLL after surgery and one without union. We performed comparative analyses between the two groups and binary logistic regression analyses on the differences in thickness of OPLL, DM, and OALL. In addition, we assessed the rates of union for OPLL and OALL longitudinally at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age at the time of injury was 69.0 (44-87) years, the mean observation period was 15.9 (6-63) months, including 38 males and 4 females, the mean BMI was 25.0 (19.0-34.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and 14 cases had DM. At the final observation, 30 cases (71.4%) got the union of OPLL at the level of the injury, and the mean time from injury to the union of OPLL was 8.4 (2-28) months. Thirty patients had OALL on CT at the time of injury. The mean difference in the thickness of the OPLL between the time of injury and 6 months after surgery was -0.07 (-1.2-0.6) mm, with no diameter enlargement. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, gender, BMI, presence of DM, and the difference in the thickness of OPLL. In the group with the union of OPLL, they had OALL at the time of injury significantly by Pearson's chi-square test (p=.007). We found OALL as an independent factor in the binary logistic regression analysis. the rate of transformation into continuous type both OPLL and OALL at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were as follows: OPLL was 12%, 37%, 57%, 73%, and OALL was 30%, 42%, 52%, 55%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggested that spinal fusion surgery has some effect of transforming OPLL into the continuous type and preventing the increase in thickness of their ossification. Cervical OPLL showed transformation into continuous type in approximately 70% at the level of posterior fusion surgery and the rate of transformation into continuous type in both OPLL and OALL showed a progressive escalation over the specified period. Given the significantly higher incidence of OALL at the time of injury in the OPLL contentious transforming group, there may be subgroups within cervical OPLL that possess factors of the union of OPLL. The patients after posterior fusion surgery for cervical spinal cord injuries with OPLL had no increase in the thickness of OPLL and no deterioration of paralysis.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400129X/pdfft?md5=7996a8affd61ce0fcf8f7eed3d0ce549&pid=1-s2.0-S266654842400129X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400129X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Context

The patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) have a high frequency in Asian, with a reported incidence of 6.3% in Japan. The presence of OPLL is a risk factor for cervical spinal cord injury, with some cases resulting from minor trauma such as falls. In previous studies, the characteristics of OPLL after surgery were mentioned, however, there is no consensus on cervical spinal cord injury with OPLL after fusion surgery.

Purpose

To investigate the natural progress of ossification in cervical spinal cord injury cases with OPLL treated by posterior fusion surgery.

Study Design/Setting

Study design is retrospective study.

Patient Sample

The subjects included 42 cases of cervical spinal cord injuries with OPLL that underwent posterior fusion surgery between 2017 and 2021 and were amenable to follow-up with CT for more than 6 months.

Outcome Measures

N/A.

Methods

We investigated the presence or absence of union of the OPLL at the level of the spinal cord injury on postoperative CT and the presence or absence of ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL) on CT at the time of injury. We measured the thickness of OPLL at the level of injury by CT at the time of injury and 6 months after surgery and calculated the difference in the thickness of OPLL. We divided the subjects into two groups: one with the union of OPLL after surgery and one without union. We performed comparative analyses between the two groups and binary logistic regression analyses on the differences in thickness of OPLL, DM, and OALL. In addition, we assessed the rates of union for OPLL and OALL longitudinally at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

Results

The mean age at the time of injury was 69.0 (44-87) years, the mean observation period was 15.9 (6-63) months, including 38 males and 4 females, the mean BMI was 25.0 (19.0-34.6) kg/m2, and 14 cases had DM. At the final observation, 30 cases (71.4%) got the union of OPLL at the level of the injury, and the mean time from injury to the union of OPLL was 8.4 (2-28) months. Thirty patients had OALL on CT at the time of injury. The mean difference in the thickness of the OPLL between the time of injury and 6 months after surgery was -0.07 (-1.2-0.6) mm, with no diameter enlargement. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, gender, BMI, presence of DM, and the difference in the thickness of OPLL. In the group with the union of OPLL, they had OALL at the time of injury significantly by Pearson's chi-square test (p=.007). We found OALL as an independent factor in the binary logistic regression analysis. the rate of transformation into continuous type both OPLL and OALL at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were as follows: OPLL was 12%, 37%, 57%, 73%, and OALL was 30%, 42%, 52%, 55%.

Conclusions

This study suggested that spinal fusion surgery has some effect of transforming OPLL into the continuous type and preventing the increase in thickness of their ossification. Cervical OPLL showed transformation into continuous type in approximately 70% at the level of posterior fusion surgery and the rate of transformation into continuous type in both OPLL and OALL showed a progressive escalation over the specified period. Given the significantly higher incidence of OALL at the time of injury in the OPLL contentious transforming group, there may be subgroups within cervical OPLL that possess factors of the union of OPLL. The patients after posterior fusion surgery for cervical spinal cord injuries with OPLL had no increase in the thickness of OPLL and no deterioration of paralysis.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

P32.后路融合术治疗颈脊髓损伤病例中 OPLL 进展的形态学分析
背景 颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者在亚洲发病率很高,据报道日本的发病率为 6.3%。颈椎后纵韧带骨化症是颈椎脊髓损伤的危险因素之一,其中一些病例是由于轻微外伤(如跌倒)引起的。研究设计/研究背景研究设计为回顾性研究。患者样本受试者包括在2017年至2021年期间接受后路融合手术治疗的42例颈脊髓损伤伴OPLL病例,均可接受CT随访6个月以上.结果测量N/A.方法我们调查术后CT上脊髓损伤水平的OPLL有无结合,以及受伤时CT上前纵韧带(OALL)有无骨化。我们在受伤时和术后 6 个月通过 CT 测量受伤水平的 OPLL 厚度,并计算 OPLL 厚度的差异。我们将受试者分为两组:一组术后 OPLL 融合,另一组未融合。我们对两组进行了比较分析,并对 OPLL 厚度、DM 和 OALL 的差异进行了二元逻辑回归分析。结果受伤时平均年龄为 69.0(44-87)岁,平均观察时间为 15.9(6-63)个月,其中男性 38 例,女性 4 例,平均体重指数为 25.0(19.0-34.6)kg/m2,14 例患有 DM。最终观察结果显示,30 例(71.4%)患者的 OPLL 在损伤处发生了粘连,从损伤到 OPLL 粘连的平均时间为 8.4(2-28)个月。30例患者在受伤时CT显示有OALL。受伤时与术后6个月之间OPLL厚度的平均差异为-0.07(-1.2-0.6)毫米,直径没有扩大。两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、是否患有糖尿病以及 OPLL 厚度差异方面均无明显差异。通过皮尔逊卡方检验(P=.007),OPLL结合组在受伤时有明显的OALL。在二元逻辑回归分析中,我们发现 OALL 是一个独立的因素。OPLL 和 OALL 在 3 个月、6 个月、1 年和 2 年的时间间隔内转化为连续型的比率如下:结论本研究表明,脊柱融合手术对 OPLL 转变为连续型和防止其骨化厚度增加有一定作用。约 70% 的颈椎 OPLL 在后路融合手术水平上转变为连续型,OPLL 和 OALL 转变为连续型的比率在特定时期内呈逐渐上升趋势。鉴于 OPLL 争议转化组在受伤时 OALL 的发生率明显较高,颈椎 OPLL 中可能存在具有 OPLL 结合因素的亚组。颈椎脊髓损伤伴有OPLL的后路融合手术后患者的OPLL厚度没有增加,瘫痪情况也没有恶化。FDA设备/药物状态本摘要不讨论也不包括任何适用的设备或药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信