A multi-criteria analysis for Environmental Flow Assessment based on hydraulic modelling

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2024.102874
{"title":"A multi-criteria analysis for Environmental Flow Assessment based on hydraulic modelling","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2024.102874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental Flow Assessment is crucial, when assessing the impact of water withdrawal on riverine habitat. Still, standard methods to tackle such exercise are not available hitherto, while several techniques were developed generally to be tailored <em>ad hoc</em> for the considered case study. Here, we propose a multi-criteria approach, usable to quantify Environmental Flow, and uncertainty thereby, basing upon a hydraulic model of the river, and habitat viability for a given target fish species. Six criteria are considered that gather 3 classes of constraints for fish development.</p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p><em>Geometric, and biological constraints</em> Fish show to cherish specific areas of the river, changing with discharge level (criterion <em>I</em>), they need a least water level to move comfortably (<em>criterion II</em>), with some degree of interconnection along the whole river bed (<em>criterion III</em>).</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p><em>Riverbed quality</em> Fine sediments (<em>criterion IV</em>) and gravel <em>(criterion V</em>) would be washed away to avoid clogging of spawning areas, and to clean and reset the gap system.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p><em>Macro-benthos requirement (criterion VI)</em> Benthic invertebrates, i.e. preys of target fish, need a minimum flow velocity to form a community. Finally, a table is generated to compare optimal values of each criterion, supporting the choice of a “globally viable” EF value.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003261/pdfft?md5=c1f3772396fe108302ed2e79da5fb5e6&pid=1-s2.0-S2215016124003261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental Flow Assessment is crucial, when assessing the impact of water withdrawal on riverine habitat. Still, standard methods to tackle such exercise are not available hitherto, while several techniques were developed generally to be tailored ad hoc for the considered case study. Here, we propose a multi-criteria approach, usable to quantify Environmental Flow, and uncertainty thereby, basing upon a hydraulic model of the river, and habitat viability for a given target fish species. Six criteria are considered that gather 3 classes of constraints for fish development.

  • Geometric, and biological constraints Fish show to cherish specific areas of the river, changing with discharge level (criterion I), they need a least water level to move comfortably (criterion II), with some degree of interconnection along the whole river bed (criterion III).

  • Riverbed quality Fine sediments (criterion IV) and gravel (criterion V) would be washed away to avoid clogging of spawning areas, and to clean and reset the gap system.

  • Macro-benthos requirement (criterion VI) Benthic invertebrates, i.e. preys of target fish, need a minimum flow velocity to form a community. Finally, a table is generated to compare optimal values of each criterion, supporting the choice of a “globally viable” EF value.

Abstract Image

基于水力模型的环境流量评估多标准分析
在评估取水对河流生境的影响时,环境流量评估至关重要。然而,迄今为止还没有标准的方法来处理这项工作,而开发的几种技术一般都是针对所考虑的案例研究而特别定制的。在此,我们提出了一种多标准方法,可用于量化环境流量及其不确定性,该方法以河流水力模型和特定目标鱼类的栖息地可行性为基础。六项标准汇集了鱼类发展的三类制约因素: -几何和生物制约因素 鱼类会珍惜河流的特定区域,并随着排水量的变化而变化(标准 I),它们需要最低的水位才能舒适地移动(标准 II),并在一定程度上与整个河床相互连接(标准 III)。-大型底栖生物要求(标准 VI) 底栖无脊椎动物,即目标鱼类的猎物,需要最低流速才能形成群落。最后,生成一个表格,比较每个标准的最佳值,为选择 "全球可行 "的 EF 值提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信