Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using 1 Anterior Portal Has a Shorter Surgical Time and Comparable Clinical Results With the Standard 2-Portal Technique

Q3 Medicine

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100984

Ali Okan Gazeloglu M.D. , Abdurrahman Yilmaz M.D. , Egemen Turhan M.D. , Filippo Familiari M.D. , Gazi Huri M.D.

{"title":"Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using 1 Anterior Portal Has a Shorter Surgical Time and Comparable Clinical Results With the Standard 2-Portal Technique","authors":"Ali Okan Gazeloglu M.D. , Abdurrahman Yilmaz M.D. , Egemen Turhan M.D. , Filippo Familiari M.D. , Gazi Huri M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the modified 1 anterior portal Bankart repair and compare it to the 2-portal Bankart repair in terms of surgical time, functional scores, and recurrent dislocation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent Bankart repair from 2014 to 2021 were identified and separated into 2 groups: a modified 1 anterior portal group and a 2 anterior portal group. The inclusion criteria were being >18 years old, having a recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with a Bankart lesion, and having a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated for their clinical results using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, and the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score pre- and postoperatively. The duration of surgery and recurrent instability were recorded. To prevent suture tangling in the modified 1-portal group, 2 techniques were performed: “cannula in cannula” and “cannula in and out.”</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 patients were included in this study, with 20 in the modified 1-portal group and 22 in the 2-portal group. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in clinical scores obtained after 2 years of surgery (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, <em>P</em> = .5; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, <em>P</em> = .22; and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, <em>P</em> = .32). The average surgical duration in the modified 1-portal group (65.7 ± 15.8) was significantly shorter than the average surgery duration in the 2-portal group (81.1 ± 27.2) (<em>P</em> = .03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for recurrent instability (<em>P</em> ≥ .999).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Bankart repair performed through a modified 1 anterior portal technique has a shorter surgical time and similar clinical outcomes as the 2-portal technique.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 6","pages":"Article 100984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24001111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the modified 1 anterior portal Bankart repair and compare it to the 2-portal Bankart repair in terms of surgical time, functional scores, and recurrent dislocation.

Methods

Patients who underwent Bankart repair from 2014 to 2021 were identified and separated into 2 groups: a modified 1 anterior portal group and a 2 anterior portal group. The inclusion criteria were being >18 years old, having a recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with a Bankart lesion, and having a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated for their clinical results using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, and the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score pre- and postoperatively. The duration of surgery and recurrent instability were recorded. To prevent suture tangling in the modified 1-portal group, 2 techniques were performed: “cannula in cannula” and “cannula in and out.”

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in this study, with 20 in the modified 1-portal group and 22 in the 2-portal group. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in clinical scores obtained after 2 years of surgery (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, P = .5; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, P = .22; and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, P = .32). The average surgical duration in the modified 1-portal group (65.7 ± 15.8) was significantly shorter than the average surgery duration in the 2-portal group (81.1 ± 27.2) (P = .03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for recurrent instability (P ≥ .999).

Conclusions

Bankart repair performed through a modified 1 anterior portal technique has a shorter surgical time and similar clinical outcomes as the 2-portal technique.