Comparative assessment of three commercial kits and in house optimized PCR assays for GMO screening in food and feed

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2024.102878
{"title":"Comparative assessment of three commercial kits and in house optimized PCR assays for GMO screening in food and feed","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2024.102878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Screening strategies for GMO detection in food and feed are a crucial aspect in GMO testing laboratories for streamlining the analytical workflow and reducing turnaround time and costs. These strategies can be more or less complex or even be targeted according to the ingredients in the product, but whatever the choice, a good basic approach is generally based on the search for 35S promoter (P35S), nos-terminator (T-nos) and FMV promoter (P-FMV). In this study, we compare the singleplex real time PCR method for P35S, T-nos and P-FMV detection currently adopted by the Italian National Reference Laboratory for GM food and feed (NRL) with three commercial kits available on the market for giving a greater choice to consider the best approach suitable to the official control laboratories that are different from each other.</p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>The NRL optimized singleplex PCR methods and the three commercial kits fully respect all the validation parameters criteria according to the minimum performance requirements (MPR) of ENGL [<span><span>1</span></span>]</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Screening strategies for GMO detection in food and feed are a crucial aspect in GMO testing laboratories and being the commercial kits different from each other, the laboratory can choose the methods best suit their needs reducing turnaround time and costs.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003303/pdfft?md5=92f7b10bfc266f7ddcf3e40fe657004a&pid=1-s2.0-S2215016124003303-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016124003303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Screening strategies for GMO detection in food and feed are a crucial aspect in GMO testing laboratories for streamlining the analytical workflow and reducing turnaround time and costs. These strategies can be more or less complex or even be targeted according to the ingredients in the product, but whatever the choice, a good basic approach is generally based on the search for 35S promoter (P35S), nos-terminator (T-nos) and FMV promoter (P-FMV). In this study, we compare the singleplex real time PCR method for P35S, T-nos and P-FMV detection currently adopted by the Italian National Reference Laboratory for GM food and feed (NRL) with three commercial kits available on the market for giving a greater choice to consider the best approach suitable to the official control laboratories that are different from each other.

  • The NRL optimized singleplex PCR methods and the three commercial kits fully respect all the validation parameters criteria according to the minimum performance requirements (MPR) of ENGL [1]

  • Screening strategies for GMO detection in food and feed are a crucial aspect in GMO testing laboratories and being the commercial kits different from each other, the laboratory can choose the methods best suit their needs reducing turnaround time and costs.

Abstract Image

对用于食品和饲料中转基因生物筛选的三种商业试剂盒和内部优化的 PCR 检测方法进行比较评估。
食品和饲料中转基因生物检测的筛选策略是转基因生物检测实验室简化分析工作流程、减少周转时间和成本的关键环节。这些策略可能或多或少比较复杂,甚至可以根据产品中的成分进行有针对性的选择,但无论如何选择,一个好的基本方法一般都是基于寻找 35S 启动子(P35S)、nos-终止子(T-nos)和 FMV 启动子(P-FMV)。在这项研究中,我们将意大利转基因食品和饲料国家参考实验室(NRL)目前采用的检测 P35S、T-nos 和 P-FMV 的单复式实时 PCR 方法与市场上的三种商业试剂盒进行了比较,以便为官方控制实验室提供更多的选择,考虑适合它们的最佳方法。-NRL 优化的单复式 PCR 方法和三种商用试剂盒完全符合 ENGL 最低性能要求 (MPR) 规定的所有验证参数标准[1]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信