Acromioclavicular joint biomechanics: a systematic review

Q4 Medicine
Genevieve M. Fraipont BA, Ryan S. Beyer BS, Michelle H. McGarry MS, Thay Q. Lee PhD
{"title":"Acromioclavicular joint biomechanics: a systematic review","authors":"Genevieve M. Fraipont BA,&nbsp;Ryan S. Beyer BS,&nbsp;Michelle H. McGarry MS,&nbsp;Thay Q. Lee PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available literature on the biomechanical characteristics of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint to identify trends in translational parameters and contributions of the various ligamentous structures supporting the joint.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases until October 2023 to identify articles reporting on the biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint. Non cadaveric or projects involving reconstruction were excluded. Consistent parameters evaluated were anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior translation. The data were extracted from the included articles and summarized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>11 biomechanical papers were reviewed from six different countries — United States (n = 6), France (n = 1), Austria (n = 1), Thailand (n = 1), United Kingdom (n = 1), and Japan (n = 1). The total number of specimens included across the reviewed papers was 141. All 11 papers reported the data on an intact model (coracoclavicular and AC ligaments intact). Seven papers assessed the translational results of the AC sectioned condition, finding a greater increase in anterior-posterior (AP) laxity relative to SI. 3 papers evaluated coracoclavicular ligament sectioning, finding increased superior-inferior laxity relative to AP. Only one study involved ligament sectioning isolating the anterior-inferior bundle of the AC joint.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlights the key AP and superior-inferior constraints of both the intact and ligament sectioned AC joint. The inconsistency of AC joint testing parameters and the lack of thorough translation studies indicate a necessity for increased attention in the overall assessment of shoulder stability to close the gap in the foundational biomechanical research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 668-675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124001056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available literature on the biomechanical characteristics of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint to identify trends in translational parameters and contributions of the various ligamentous structures supporting the joint.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases until October 2023 to identify articles reporting on the biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint. Non cadaveric or projects involving reconstruction were excluded. Consistent parameters evaluated were anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior translation. The data were extracted from the included articles and summarized.

Results

11 biomechanical papers were reviewed from six different countries — United States (n = 6), France (n = 1), Austria (n = 1), Thailand (n = 1), United Kingdom (n = 1), and Japan (n = 1). The total number of specimens included across the reviewed papers was 141. All 11 papers reported the data on an intact model (coracoclavicular and AC ligaments intact). Seven papers assessed the translational results of the AC sectioned condition, finding a greater increase in anterior-posterior (AP) laxity relative to SI. 3 papers evaluated coracoclavicular ligament sectioning, finding increased superior-inferior laxity relative to AP. Only one study involved ligament sectioning isolating the anterior-inferior bundle of the AC joint.

Conclusion

This review highlights the key AP and superior-inferior constraints of both the intact and ligament sectioned AC joint. The inconsistency of AC joint testing parameters and the lack of thorough translation studies indicate a necessity for increased attention in the overall assessment of shoulder stability to close the gap in the foundational biomechanical research.
肱锁关节生物力学:系统回顾
背景 本系统性综述旨在研究有关肩锁关节(AC)生物力学特征的现有文献,以确定关节平移参数的趋势以及支撑关节的各种韧带结构的贡献。方法 在 Web of Science、Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定有关 AC 关节生物力学特征的报道文章。非尸体或涉及重建的项目被排除在外。评估的一致参数包括前方、后方、上方和下方平移。从收录的文章中提取数据并进行总结。结果共审查了来自六个不同国家的 11 篇生物力学论文--美国(n = 6)、法国(n = 1)、奥地利(n = 1)、泰国(n = 1)、英国(n = 1)和日本(n = 1)。综述论文共纳入 141 份标本。所有 11 篇论文都报告了完整模型的数据(锁骨和交流韧带完好无损)。7篇论文评估了交流切面的平移结果,发现相对于SI,前后(AP)松弛度增加更多。3 篇论文评估了锁骨韧带断裂情况,发现相对于 AP,上下松弛度增加。只有一项研究涉及韧带切片,分离了交流关节的前内束。交流关节测试参数的不一致性和缺乏透彻的翻译研究表明,有必要加强对肩关节稳定性整体评估的关注,以缩小基础生物力学研究的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信