The diagnostic performance of indocyanine green for the sentinel node biopsy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Siyang Ma , Jianxuan Sun , Jinzhou Xu, Ye An, Mengyao Xu, Chenqian Liu, Sihan Zhang, Lintao Miao, Xingyu Zhong, Na Zeng, Haodong He, Shaogang Wang, Qidong Xia
{"title":"The diagnostic performance of indocyanine green for the sentinel node biopsy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Siyang Ma ,&nbsp;Jianxuan Sun ,&nbsp;Jinzhou Xu,&nbsp;Ye An,&nbsp;Mengyao Xu,&nbsp;Chenqian Liu,&nbsp;Sihan Zhang,&nbsp;Lintao Miao,&nbsp;Xingyu Zhong,&nbsp;Na Zeng,&nbsp;Haodong He,&nbsp;Shaogang Wang,&nbsp;Qidong Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.ajur.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Almost 15% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients were found to have lymph node metastases (LNMs), which are associated with higher risk of biochemical recurrence. Using indocyanine green (ICG) for the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) before surgery was proposed to detect LNMs in PCa patients. However, its diagnostic performance still remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of ICG for the SNB in PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis has been reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database, and the register number is CRD42023421911. Four bibliographic databases were searched, <em>i.e.</em>, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to retrieve articles studying the diagnostic performance of ICG for the SNB in PCa from the inception to Sep 9, 2023. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were also conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 17 articles from databases are enrolled in this study. Using lymph node-based data, our results showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of applying ICG alone in PCa were 71% (95% CI 52%–85%) and 68% (95% CI 64%–72%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of applying ICG-technetium-99m-nanocolloid in PCa were 49% (95% CI 39%–59%) and 69% (95% CI 67%–71%), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The efficacy of using ICG or ICG-technetium-99m-nanocolloid for the SNB in PCa is relatively unsatisfactory. ICG cannot yet substitute extended pelvic lymph node dissection for detecting LNMs accurately. More research or novel tracers are needed to achieve the goal of precise surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46599,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Urology","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388224000912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Almost 15% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients were found to have lymph node metastases (LNMs), which are associated with higher risk of biochemical recurrence. Using indocyanine green (ICG) for the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) before surgery was proposed to detect LNMs in PCa patients. However, its diagnostic performance still remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of ICG for the SNB in PCa.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis has been reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database, and the register number is CRD42023421911. Four bibliographic databases were searched, i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to retrieve articles studying the diagnostic performance of ICG for the SNB in PCa from the inception to Sep 9, 2023. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were also conducted.

Results

A total of 17 articles from databases are enrolled in this study. Using lymph node-based data, our results showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of applying ICG alone in PCa were 71% (95% CI 52%–85%) and 68% (95% CI 64%–72%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of applying ICG-technetium-99m-nanocolloid in PCa were 49% (95% CI 39%–59%) and 69% (95% CI 67%–71%), respectively.

Conclusion

The efficacy of using ICG or ICG-technetium-99m-nanocolloid for the SNB in PCa is relatively unsatisfactory. ICG cannot yet substitute extended pelvic lymph node dissection for detecting LNMs accurately. More research or novel tracers are needed to achieve the goal of precise surgery.
吲哚菁绿用于前列腺癌前哨节点活检的诊断性能:系统综述和荟萃分析
目的近15%的前列腺癌(PCa)患者存在淋巴结转移(LNMs),淋巴结转移具有较高的生化复发风险。建议术前采用吲哚菁绿(ICG)进行前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)检测PCa患者的LNMs。然而,其诊断性能仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨ICG对前列腺癌中SNB的诊断价值。方法本系统评价和荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行报道。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册数据库中注册,注册号为CRD42023421911。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和Web of Science四个文献数据库,检索自PCa成立至2023年9月9日有关ICG对SNB诊断性能的文章。我们计算了合并的敏感性、特异性、似然比、诊断优势比及其95%置信区间(ci)。并进行亚组分析和meta回归分析。结果本研究共纳入数据库中的17篇文章。使用基于淋巴结的数据,我们的结果显示单独应用ICG治疗PCa的敏感性和特异性分别为71% (95% CI 52%-85%)和68% (95% CI 64%-72%)。在PCa中应用icg -锝-99m纳米胶体的总敏感性和特异性分别为49% (95% CI 39%-59%)和69% (95% CI 67%-71%)。结论应用ICG或ICG-tech -99m纳米胶体治疗前列腺癌的SNB疗效较差。ICG尚不能代替盆腔淋巴结清扫术准确检测LNMs。需要更多的研究或新的示踪剂来实现精确手术的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Urology
Asian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Urology (AJUR), launched in October 2014, is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal jointly founded by Shanghai Association for Science and Technology (SAST) and Second Military Medical University (SMMU). AJUR aims to build a communication platform for international researchers to effectively share scholarly achievements. It focuses on all specialties of urology both scientifically and clinically, with article types widely covering editorials, opinions, perspectives, reviews and mini-reviews, original articles, cases reports, rapid communications, and letters, etc. Fields of particular interest to the journal including, but not limited to: • Surgical oncology • Endourology • Calculi • Female urology • Erectile dysfunction • Infertility • Pediatric urology • Renal transplantation • Reconstructive surgery • Radiology • Pathology • Neurourology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信