The Effects of a Second-Chance Exam Policy in a Large-Enrollment Introductory Accounting Course

Melissa P. Larson, Jared R. Stark, W. B. Tayler
{"title":"The Effects of a Second-Chance Exam Policy in a Large-Enrollment Introductory Accounting Course","authors":"Melissa P. Larson, Jared R. Stark, W. B. Tayler","doi":"10.2308/issues-2022-071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Using a quasi-experimental design, we compare two semesters of an introductory accounting course to evaluate the impact of a second-chance exam policy (SCEP) on student performance and anxiety, analyzing data from 1,986 students. The SCEP, allowing two additional attempts at exams capped at 80 percent credit, significantly improved academic outcomes and decreased perceived test anxiety. Specifically, students during the SCEP semester experienced an average increase of 4.46 percent in exam scores (p < 0.01), a 3.37 percent increase in course percentage points (p < 0.01), and a GPA increase of 0.21 (p < 0.01). Notably, women experienced greater improvements than men in measured academic outcomes. Our findings suggest that SCEPs can be an effective intervention to increase academic performance and reduce anxiety. We also examine an SCEP’s effect on preparation for exam first attempts and find that students perform better on a first attempt with an SCEP.\n JEL Classifications: A22.","PeriodicalId":503293,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Accounting Education","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2022-071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a quasi-experimental design, we compare two semesters of an introductory accounting course to evaluate the impact of a second-chance exam policy (SCEP) on student performance and anxiety, analyzing data from 1,986 students. The SCEP, allowing two additional attempts at exams capped at 80 percent credit, significantly improved academic outcomes and decreased perceived test anxiety. Specifically, students during the SCEP semester experienced an average increase of 4.46 percent in exam scores (p < 0.01), a 3.37 percent increase in course percentage points (p < 0.01), and a GPA increase of 0.21 (p < 0.01). Notably, women experienced greater improvements than men in measured academic outcomes. Our findings suggest that SCEPs can be an effective intervention to increase academic performance and reduce anxiety. We also examine an SCEP’s effect on preparation for exam first attempts and find that students perform better on a first attempt with an SCEP. JEL Classifications: A22.
二次考试政策在大班会计入门课程中的效果
我们采用准实验设计,比较了两学期的会计入门课程,评估了二次考试政策(SCEP)对学生成绩和焦虑的影响,分析了来自1986名学生的数据。二次考试政策允许两次额外的考试机会,学分上限为 80%,该政策显著提高了学习成绩,降低了考试焦虑感。具体来说,在 SCEP 学期,学生的考试成绩平均提高了 4.46%(p < 0.01),课程百分点提高了 3.37%(p < 0.01),GPA 提高了 0.21(p < 0.01)。值得注意的是,与男性相比,女性的学业成绩提高幅度更大。我们的研究结果表明,SCEP 是提高学习成绩和减少焦虑的有效干预措施。我们还研究了 SCEP 对首次考试准备工作的影响,发现学生在首次考试中使用 SCEP 会取得更好的成绩。JEL 分类:A22.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信