Characterizing Chronic Pelvic Pain: The Relationship Between Extrapelvic Muscle Stiffness, Pain Level, Health History, and Pelvic Floor Symptoms in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain

Laurel Proulx, Kelli J Brizzolara, Mary Thompson, S. Wang-Price, Patricia Rodriguez, Shane Koppenhaver
{"title":"Characterizing Chronic Pelvic Pain: The Relationship Between Extrapelvic Muscle Stiffness, Pain Level, Health History, and Pelvic Floor Symptoms in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain","authors":"Laurel Proulx, Kelli J Brizzolara, Mary Thompson, S. Wang-Price, Patricia Rodriguez, Shane Koppenhaver","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess the association of extrapelvic muscular stiffness measures with pelvic floor symptoms and clinical impairments in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). In addition to bivariate correlations, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify multivariate clinical presentation patterns of CPP.\n \n \n \n Muscle stiffness measurements of 11 extrapelvic muscles were taken in 149 women with CPP. Associations between muscle stiffness and clinical measures such as pelvic floor function, pain, psychosocial status, and urogynecology history were calculated. In addition, variables were assessed using EFA to identify patterns of CPP.\n \n \n \n There were small but significant correlations between muscle stiffness measurements and clinical measures. Three categorizations of CPP symptoms and impairments emerged from the 25 continuous variables chosen for EFA. These could be classified as follows: (1) pelvic floor dysfunction and psychosocial involvement; (2) muscle stiffness of the hips and thighs; and (3) muscle stiffness of the low back and abdomen, collectively making up 49.1% of the variance.\n \n \n \n Stiffness of commonly treated extrapelvic muscles was not strongly correlated to pain level or health history of women with CPP. The first EFA component is consistent with patients routinely seen by pelvic health physical therapists, and the latter components are consistent with those who may benefit initially from orthopedic physical therapy. Further research looking at the relationship of muscle stiffness, pelvic floor function, and movement impairments is needed. EFA may be a starting point to better understand who may be appropriate for orthopedic physical therapy treatment versus specialized pelvic health physical therapy care.\n","PeriodicalId":518889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess the association of extrapelvic muscular stiffness measures with pelvic floor symptoms and clinical impairments in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). In addition to bivariate correlations, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify multivariate clinical presentation patterns of CPP. Muscle stiffness measurements of 11 extrapelvic muscles were taken in 149 women with CPP. Associations between muscle stiffness and clinical measures such as pelvic floor function, pain, psychosocial status, and urogynecology history were calculated. In addition, variables were assessed using EFA to identify patterns of CPP. There were small but significant correlations between muscle stiffness measurements and clinical measures. Three categorizations of CPP symptoms and impairments emerged from the 25 continuous variables chosen for EFA. These could be classified as follows: (1) pelvic floor dysfunction and psychosocial involvement; (2) muscle stiffness of the hips and thighs; and (3) muscle stiffness of the low back and abdomen, collectively making up 49.1% of the variance. Stiffness of commonly treated extrapelvic muscles was not strongly correlated to pain level or health history of women with CPP. The first EFA component is consistent with patients routinely seen by pelvic health physical therapists, and the latter components are consistent with those who may benefit initially from orthopedic physical therapy. Further research looking at the relationship of muscle stiffness, pelvic floor function, and movement impairments is needed. EFA may be a starting point to better understand who may be appropriate for orthopedic physical therapy treatment versus specialized pelvic health physical therapy care.
慢性骨盆疼痛的特征:慢性骨盆疼痛妇女骨盆外肌肉僵硬度、疼痛程度、健康史和骨盆底症状之间的关系
这项横断面研究的目的是评估骨盆外肌肉僵硬度测量与慢性骨盆疼痛(CPP)女性骨盆底症状和临床损伤之间的关联。除了二元相关性外,研究还采用探索性因子分析(EFA)来确定 CPP 的多变量临床表现模式。 对 149 名患有 CPP 的妇女的 11 块骨盆外肌肉进行了肌肉僵硬度测量。计算了肌肉僵硬度与盆底功能、疼痛、社会心理状态和泌尿妇科病史等临床指标之间的关联。此外,还使用 EFA 对变量进行了评估,以确定 CPP 的模式。 肌肉僵硬度测量值与临床测量值之间存在微小但重要的相关性。从选定用于 EFA 的 25 个连续变量中得出了 CPP 症状和损伤的三种分类。这些分类如下(1) 盆底功能障碍和心理社会参与;(2) 臀部和大腿肌肉僵硬;(3) 腰部和腹部肌肉僵硬,共占方差的 49.1%。 通常治疗的骨盆外肌肉僵硬与 CPP 妇女的疼痛程度或健康史并无密切关系。EFA 的第一个成分与骨盆健康理疗师经常接诊的患者一致,而后几个成分则与那些最初可能受益于骨科理疗的患者一致。还需要进一步研究肌肉僵硬、盆底功能和运动障碍之间的关系。EFA 可以作为一个起点,更好地了解哪些人适合接受矫形理疗治疗,哪些人不适合接受专门的骨盆健康理疗护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信